G
GojuBrian
Guest
I say it should be allowed. Why not as long as they practice discretion? Baby has to eat!!
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
handy said:This subject was on O'Reilly last night. There is a new law in the state of Washington that makes it a civil-right for a woman to breast feed her child (not just infant but child) in public, without the need to cover up.
You're right, Brian, baby does have to eat. I don't think this is about a woman who feeds her baby discreetly in public. Everyone understands that and rarely would (or should) anyone complain.
But, once on the way to Disneyland with a family from our church, we had stopped at a Denny's. While we were waiting to be served, we noticed a woman with a four-year-old boy sitting not far from us. Well, the woman was sitting. The boy was all over the place. Then, while we were sitting there, with the kids in our own group, the boy, again he was about 4 mind you, walked over to his mother, pulled her shirt up completely exposing her breast, (she wasn't wearing a bra) and started to chow down. Nor was the boy simply eating. Because he was probably ADHD as well, he kept sitting up and looking around whenever anyone would pass by or a car would pull into the parking lot or whatever. When that happened, the woman was completely exposed and was simply hanging there.
This law in Washington makes it to where a business can not ask a woman like that to at least put a blanket or something over herself while breastfeeding her child. Now I agree, no woman should ever be asked to breastfeed in the bathroom. Think about it, would you want to eat in the bathroom? Nor do I think that babies should be covered with hot blankets when they are trying to eat, because a lot of babies get really fussy doing that. But, most mothers are still quite discreet when it comes to breast feeding, holding their baby or their arms in such a way that isn't uncomfortable for others. I don't think this law is applying to these women though. Frankly, I think this is a case when the government should stay out of things. Women should be able to breast feed discreetly, but when it's not done discreetly, businesses or others should be able to ask her to do so. Can't ask now in Washington though.
My case in point, I just watched the news, and right outside of Philly at a Wall Mart, they have a guy on camera watching, a lady and a following her around the store unbeknownst to her. And this stupid dude follows her home yesterday and rapes her. It is not safe in the USA anymore. You got people stalking girls on the beach, and they will stalk a mother breast feeding her child, just because they are shown some skin. The days are evil. Am I over reacting here ?Lewis W said:Yup baby has to eat, but I don't think that she should whip them out on a public transportation bus, or on a crowded street, plus you have all the sex addicts out there, who would just get a thrill out of that. They might even follow you home. And can't nobody tell me, that they are not out there.
My case in point, I just watched the news, and right outside of Philly at a Wall Mart, they have a guy on camera watching, a lady and a following her around the store unbeknownst to her. And this stupid dude follows her home yesterday and rapes her. It is not safe in the USA anymore. You got people stalking girls on the beach, and they will stalk a mother breast feeding her child, just because they are shown some skin. The days are evil. Am I over reacting here ?[/quote:1kc9pbi9]Its always been like this, history has shown us that civilizations older then the first people to sail over here had these problems.Lewis W said:[quote="Lewis W":1kc9pbi9]Yup baby has to eat, but I don't think that she should whip them out on a public transportation bus, or on a crowded street, plus you have all the sex addicts out there, who would just get a thrill out of that. They might even follow you home. And can't nobody tell me, that they are not out there.
Not sure, but I think it's more of a cultural thing.Dave Slayer said:Is it Biblical?
Not sure, but I think it's more of a cultural thing.Nick_29 said:[quote="Dave Slayer":1oqovcm3]Is it Biblical?
Not sure, but I think it's more of a cultural thing.Dave Slayer said:[quote="Nick_29":1n4cv1l9][quote="Dave Slayer":1n4cv1l9]Is it Biblical?
GojuBrian said:If I ever start to lactate I'll go down to the local shelter and feed puppies. :eyebrow