lukadrower
Member
In today's video, we would like to discuss a topic related to facts that took place or are still taking place during the pandemic, pointing to the return of Christ and the end of times. Before we begin, however, we would like to make it clear that the purpose of the film is not to cause panic, but rather to warn and help understand current world events. They clearly indicate that the words of Holy Scripture are beginning to be fulfilled. In recent years, there has been a revolution around the world in the way we make payments and manage our finances.
What was once standard cash transactions are gradually giving way to digital payments. However, what began as a convenient alternative now seems to be gaining in importance and becoming a source of controversy and biblical interpretation. The first clear sign of the pandemic that points to the beginning of the end of times is the increasing withdrawal of cash from circulation and the introduction of digital money as the main means of payment. During the pandemic, many countries have considered and some even implemented measures to restrict the use of physical money.
An example is the situation in Belgium, where the government banned cash transactions during the most difficult period of the disease. Belgians were obliged to make payments only by credit or debit cards and online transfers. This solution has gained enormous popularity due to its convenience and effectiveness. Many consider them cheaper and more practical than traditional cash transactions. However, what seemed like a reasonable response to the pandemic began to cause concern and controversy in some circles. Some have begun to see a similarity between these changes and the prophecy in Revelation chapter thirteen in the Bible, which is commonly known as the "mark of the beast."
The fragment reads as follows: "And he causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, and that no one may buy or sell unless he has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of the beast." name. Here wisdom is needed. Let him who has understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man. And his number is six hundred and sixty-six." In some people's interpretation, eliminating cash and switching to digital money may be the first step towards fulfilling this biblical prophecy. However, it is unclear what exactly this "mark of the beast" will be. Some speculate that it could be a mark on the skin, a mark or even an implanted chip that stores financial and other personal information. Scientists say such technology already exists and can be used for various purposes.
Let's not forget that cash payment has always been a symbol of financial freedom and privacy. It gives us control over our money and allows us to remain anonymous in certain transactions. It is also a way to avoid having our expenses tracked by financial institutions or the government. Taking away our ability to pay in cash is an attempt to limit our financial autonomy. The introduction of digital money and the withdrawal of cash from circulation means that our financial transactions become more visible and controlled by various institutions. This can undermine our privacy and control over our money.
The pandemic has sparked numerous responses from governments around the world. During the most critical months of the pandemic, governments introduced a wide range of measures to control the spread of the virus. Bans on leaving home, restrictions on public places and public transport, and the closure of many businesses are just some of these measures. Many entrepreneurs who had been working hard to build their businesses suddenly had to close the doors of their businesses, which had huge financial consequences. It cannot be disputed that in the face of the pandemic, certain countermeasures were necessary to protect public health and people's lives.
However, the way countries implemented these measures has raised concerns and controversy. In many cases, government actions were perceived as authoritarian, limiting individuals' rights to freedom of movement and choice. As a result, many citizens felt like prisoners in their own homes. This restriction of freedom and abuse of power is seen by some as a reminder of the vision the apostle John had in the Book of Revelation. There we read about a "beast" rising out of the sea, having ten horns and seven heads. This symbolic story from the Bible describes a powerful and authoritarian system that gains enormous power over the world. The "beast" is able to give arrogant and blasphemous orders that people are obliged to obey, otherwise they are exposed to persecution.
Although there has been no news of direct state enforcement for non-compliance with isolation rules during the pandemic, many citizens have been fined or arrested for violating the restrictions. This shows that the government can impose restrictions on our rights in response to certain emergencies and force people to obey. It is important that we as citizens remain vigilant and aware of potential abuses of power, and continue to strive to ensure that states act to respect the rights and freedoms of their citizens. The pandemic provided an opportunity for countries to introduce emergency measures that sometimes involved restrictions on fundamental civil rights.
Bans on leaving home, curfews, border controls and excessive surveillance of citizens have become the norm in many countries. Monitoring and tracking systems were introduced to control the movement of people and identify cases of infection. In some cases, these activities have crossed the boundaries of individual privacy and freedom. There are concerns that these temporary control measures could become a permanent feature of the political landscape and introduce lasting changes to governance. Growing state authoritarianism is becoming an object of observation and analysis because it undermines traditional principles of democratic management and human rights.
During the pandemic, we saw some services and facilities being classified as 'essential', meaning they were allowed to remain open, while others were deemed 'non-essential' and forced to close their doors. Supermarkets, pharmacies, hospitals and bakeries have been deemed essential, which is understandable as people need to look after their physical health and ensure access to food and medicine. However, churches, which are not only a place of religious worship but also support for people's mental and spiritual health in difficult times, were also classified as "non-essential" and forced to suspend their activities, even if they complied with sanitary standards.
This raises questions about society's priorities and values during the pandemic. Pet stores, which were also deemed "essential", were on the list of services considered essential, which seems odd given that these were places where pet products are sold. Of course, animals deserve care and attention, but is this a higher priority than caring for the spiritual needs of humans? Someone may say that people can pray in their homes, which is true. However, the Church is a place where believers gather to worship God together, hear His Word, and participate in sacraments such as the Eucharist.
. The Apostle Paul wrote: "Let us not give up meeting together, as some people do, but let us encourage one another, especially as you see that the day is approaching." In times of uncertainty and fear, such joint meetings are of great importance. The state's decisions to close churches seem to suggest that the spiritual and religious aspects of people's lives are not considered a priority. This may indicate the marginalization of the role of the Church in society and the decline in the importance of spiritual values. Many government officials have already expressed their aversion to the Church and Christianity, which in the context of the pandemic may lead to restrictions on freedom of religion and religious practices.
In the Book of Amos we read: "Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord God, when I will send a famine upon the land; not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but a famine of hearing the words of the Lord. Then they will wander from sea to sea, and they will go from north to east, find the word of the Lord, but they will not find it. This conjures up images of a lack of spiritual teaching and guidance. Does this mean that we are on the way to marginalizing spiritual values and the role of the Church in society? For many people practicing faith, participation in services and sacraments is an important element of spiritual life. Closing churches and limiting access to these religious experiences has had a negative impact on the mental and spiritual health of many people. The pandemic has also affected the celebration of religious holidays and celebrations, which are an important part of religious life.
Restrictions related to the pandemic have made traditional celebrations of holidays such as Easter and Christmas difficult or limited. The church, like many other religious institutions, often engages in charitable and social activities. The pandemic limited the ability of these institutions to help those in need in times of crisis, which further highlighted their marginalization during the pandemic. Legal and constitutional issues related to restrictions on church activities have also become the subject of debate and controversy. Freedom of religion and religious assembly is an important individual right, and these restrictions may undermine those rights. It is worth continuing debates and reflections on this topic to find a balance between health care and religious freedom, especially in the context of future crises.
The fourth sign of the pandemic that points to the end of times is the media's control over people's emotions. The
What was once standard cash transactions are gradually giving way to digital payments. However, what began as a convenient alternative now seems to be gaining in importance and becoming a source of controversy and biblical interpretation. The first clear sign of the pandemic that points to the beginning of the end of times is the increasing withdrawal of cash from circulation and the introduction of digital money as the main means of payment. During the pandemic, many countries have considered and some even implemented measures to restrict the use of physical money.
An example is the situation in Belgium, where the government banned cash transactions during the most difficult period of the disease. Belgians were obliged to make payments only by credit or debit cards and online transfers. This solution has gained enormous popularity due to its convenience and effectiveness. Many consider them cheaper and more practical than traditional cash transactions. However, what seemed like a reasonable response to the pandemic began to cause concern and controversy in some circles. Some have begun to see a similarity between these changes and the prophecy in Revelation chapter thirteen in the Bible, which is commonly known as the "mark of the beast."
The fragment reads as follows: "And he causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, and that no one may buy or sell unless he has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of the beast." name. Here wisdom is needed. Let him who has understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man. And his number is six hundred and sixty-six." In some people's interpretation, eliminating cash and switching to digital money may be the first step towards fulfilling this biblical prophecy. However, it is unclear what exactly this "mark of the beast" will be. Some speculate that it could be a mark on the skin, a mark or even an implanted chip that stores financial and other personal information. Scientists say such technology already exists and can be used for various purposes.
Let's not forget that cash payment has always been a symbol of financial freedom and privacy. It gives us control over our money and allows us to remain anonymous in certain transactions. It is also a way to avoid having our expenses tracked by financial institutions or the government. Taking away our ability to pay in cash is an attempt to limit our financial autonomy. The introduction of digital money and the withdrawal of cash from circulation means that our financial transactions become more visible and controlled by various institutions. This can undermine our privacy and control over our money.
The pandemic has sparked numerous responses from governments around the world. During the most critical months of the pandemic, governments introduced a wide range of measures to control the spread of the virus. Bans on leaving home, restrictions on public places and public transport, and the closure of many businesses are just some of these measures. Many entrepreneurs who had been working hard to build their businesses suddenly had to close the doors of their businesses, which had huge financial consequences. It cannot be disputed that in the face of the pandemic, certain countermeasures were necessary to protect public health and people's lives.
However, the way countries implemented these measures has raised concerns and controversy. In many cases, government actions were perceived as authoritarian, limiting individuals' rights to freedom of movement and choice. As a result, many citizens felt like prisoners in their own homes. This restriction of freedom and abuse of power is seen by some as a reminder of the vision the apostle John had in the Book of Revelation. There we read about a "beast" rising out of the sea, having ten horns and seven heads. This symbolic story from the Bible describes a powerful and authoritarian system that gains enormous power over the world. The "beast" is able to give arrogant and blasphemous orders that people are obliged to obey, otherwise they are exposed to persecution.
Although there has been no news of direct state enforcement for non-compliance with isolation rules during the pandemic, many citizens have been fined or arrested for violating the restrictions. This shows that the government can impose restrictions on our rights in response to certain emergencies and force people to obey. It is important that we as citizens remain vigilant and aware of potential abuses of power, and continue to strive to ensure that states act to respect the rights and freedoms of their citizens. The pandemic provided an opportunity for countries to introduce emergency measures that sometimes involved restrictions on fundamental civil rights.
Bans on leaving home, curfews, border controls and excessive surveillance of citizens have become the norm in many countries. Monitoring and tracking systems were introduced to control the movement of people and identify cases of infection. In some cases, these activities have crossed the boundaries of individual privacy and freedom. There are concerns that these temporary control measures could become a permanent feature of the political landscape and introduce lasting changes to governance. Growing state authoritarianism is becoming an object of observation and analysis because it undermines traditional principles of democratic management and human rights.
During the pandemic, we saw some services and facilities being classified as 'essential', meaning they were allowed to remain open, while others were deemed 'non-essential' and forced to close their doors. Supermarkets, pharmacies, hospitals and bakeries have been deemed essential, which is understandable as people need to look after their physical health and ensure access to food and medicine. However, churches, which are not only a place of religious worship but also support for people's mental and spiritual health in difficult times, were also classified as "non-essential" and forced to suspend their activities, even if they complied with sanitary standards.
This raises questions about society's priorities and values during the pandemic. Pet stores, which were also deemed "essential", were on the list of services considered essential, which seems odd given that these were places where pet products are sold. Of course, animals deserve care and attention, but is this a higher priority than caring for the spiritual needs of humans? Someone may say that people can pray in their homes, which is true. However, the Church is a place where believers gather to worship God together, hear His Word, and participate in sacraments such as the Eucharist.
. The Apostle Paul wrote: "Let us not give up meeting together, as some people do, but let us encourage one another, especially as you see that the day is approaching." In times of uncertainty and fear, such joint meetings are of great importance. The state's decisions to close churches seem to suggest that the spiritual and religious aspects of people's lives are not considered a priority. This may indicate the marginalization of the role of the Church in society and the decline in the importance of spiritual values. Many government officials have already expressed their aversion to the Church and Christianity, which in the context of the pandemic may lead to restrictions on freedom of religion and religious practices.
In the Book of Amos we read: "Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord God, when I will send a famine upon the land; not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but a famine of hearing the words of the Lord. Then they will wander from sea to sea, and they will go from north to east, find the word of the Lord, but they will not find it. This conjures up images of a lack of spiritual teaching and guidance. Does this mean that we are on the way to marginalizing spiritual values and the role of the Church in society? For many people practicing faith, participation in services and sacraments is an important element of spiritual life. Closing churches and limiting access to these religious experiences has had a negative impact on the mental and spiritual health of many people. The pandemic has also affected the celebration of religious holidays and celebrations, which are an important part of religious life.
Restrictions related to the pandemic have made traditional celebrations of holidays such as Easter and Christmas difficult or limited. The church, like many other religious institutions, often engages in charitable and social activities. The pandemic limited the ability of these institutions to help those in need in times of crisis, which further highlighted their marginalization during the pandemic. Legal and constitutional issues related to restrictions on church activities have also become the subject of debate and controversy. Freedom of religion and religious assembly is an important individual right, and these restrictions may undermine those rights. It is worth continuing debates and reflections on this topic to find a balance between health care and religious freedom, especially in the context of future crises.
The fourth sign of the pandemic that points to the end of times is the media's control over people's emotions. The
Last edited by a moderator:
