This is to discuss some objections made from Hopeful 2 and Josef in my introduction thread (https://christianforums.net/threads/greetings-from-switzerland.103964/)
First, I believe that “Sola Scriptura” be the foundation of all other Solae. Yes all other Solae find their justification in the Scripture.
The 5 historical Solae were to defend the faith against the perversions of the roman catholic church at the time:
Today, as the faith is attacked differently as formely, other Solae could make sense. However I find that the historical Solae express the essence of the Gospel with only a few words. OTOH, they are not Scripture! That means we cannot use a Sola to dismiss Scripture, e.g. to use “Sola Fide” against the fact that Scripture calls a faith dead without works (James 2:17)!
First, I believe that “Sola Scriptura” be the foundation of all other Solae. Yes all other Solae find their justification in the Scripture.
The 5 historical Solae were to defend the faith against the perversions of the roman catholic church at the time:
Perversion of the Faith | Faith according to the 5 Solae |
Tradition and councils are said to have the same authority as Scripture, but ultimately undermine the authority of Scripture | Sola Scriptura |
Maria, the saints, the priests and the pope are mediators between us and God. | Solus Christus |
We deserve heaven with our own justice, efforts, works. Selling of indulgences. The priest forgives our sins and instruct us to the penances we have to perform, so that our sins will be forgiven. | Sola Gracia Sola Fide |
People were boasting of their devotions | Soli Deo Gloria |
Today, as the faith is attacked differently as formely, other Solae could make sense. However I find that the historical Solae express the essence of the Gospel with only a few words. OTOH, they are not Scripture! That means we cannot use a Sola to dismiss Scripture, e.g. to use “Sola Fide” against the fact that Scripture calls a faith dead without works (James 2:17)!