KnarfKS said:
Your arguements are talking about completely different ideas. I would say that you won't find anyone altering their theology or idea of communication with God based upon a building or a pastor. Otherwise that would be a problem also.
This is absolutely not true.
One need only glance at the many faces of Christianity to understand both "theology" and "communication with God" have been altered (adjusted to fall in step with) by a building and/or a pastor. Or more specifically, what each comes to represent to individuals.
Something as simple as the way a person dresses does not escape the influence.
An excellent example of this is found in the scriptures that deal with a OT King of Israel, Jeroboam, and his attempt to set up an altar to God in his own land so that his subjects would not have to go up to Jerusalem on the days specified in the law of Moses. For he was afraid that when they went up to Jerusalem their hearts would be turned back to the House of God in Jerusalem and that he would lose his power over them;
1 Kings 12:26-33, "And Jeroboam said in his heart, Now the kingdom will return to the house of David. If this people go up to make sacrifices in the house of Jehovah at Jerusalem, the heart of this people will return to their lord, to Rehoboam the king of Judah; and they will slay me and return to Rehoboam the king of Judah. And the king took counsel and made two calves of gold. And he said to them, It is too much for you to go up to Jerusalem. Behold your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt! And he set one in Bethel, and he put the other one in Dan.
And this thing became a sin; and the people went to worship the one as far as Dan. And he made a house of high places and appointed priests from among the people who were not from the sons of Levi. And Jeroboam ordained a feast in the eighth month, on the fifteenth day of the month, like the feast that is in Judah, and he went up to the altar; he did likewise at Bethel, sacrificing to the calves that he had made. And he placed in Bethel the priests of the high places that he had made. And he went up to the altar that he had made at Bethel on the fifteenth day, in the eighth month, that is, the month he had devised in his own heart; and he ordained a feast for the children of Israel and went up to the altar to burn incense."
In the chapter that follows (13) we can find God's response to Jeroboam's actions. And in a sense, the same will be true of how God deals with the position in Christianity of pastors and buildings.
KnarfKS said:
The pastor and church building are abilical, meaning they are just not addressed. Not that there is anything inherently evil about them. It can become a problem, but it doesn't have to.
Neither did the commandments and laws in ordinances have to become a problem,.... but they did,.... because men will be men.
KnarfKS said:
Just because the bible doesn't specifically address that we should go to the bathroom doesn't mean its not alright. It is abiblical as well. And can be used in a wrong way.
Actually, the OT has some very clear instructions regarding personal hygiene.
Just as the bible most certainly does address the matters of authority and the meeting of the saints.
You just need to know where to look.
In love,
cj