S
Solo
Guest
The following link leads to very interesting reading concerning the first pope named peter.
http://www.remnantofgod.org/pope1.htm
http://www.remnantofgod.org/pope1.htm
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
That is the basis of their authority. Without the link to Peter through the verse of scripture where Jesus comments on the Church being built on Peter's admission that Jesus is the Christ, they take it that Peter is the Rock that the Church will be built upon. Without this, they have no authority. They even deny that Peter was the apostle to the Jews, and Paul was the apostle to the gentiles.Lewis W said:I wonder why they still hold to this, even when you prove it to them, they still will say Peter was the first pope.
And the Bible makes this clear.They even deny that Peter was the apostle to the Jews, and Paul was the apostle to the gentiles.
Right on D46That staute of "Peter" that's in Rome, if you look good and know a bit of history on that figure, was in actuality, Jupiter before it was called St. Peter. Notice the two fingered salute...that ain't no peace sign, brother! That symbolism can be seen in much of Catholic art...even on Jesus portraits and many times on pictures of PiusXII. And, just as the figure and representation of Mary they so lovingly declare they don't worship, had another name also...Semiramis, Venus, Isis, and many other names down through the ages. A cover up for all things is evident. Taking something pagan and trying to cover it up with somethng Christian. And, they do decieve the masses (no pun intended).
Semiramis, started a lot of stuff that is still going on today by the Catholics and others..Semiramis,
Lyric's Dad,Lyric's Dad said:I don't personally have an oppinion on Peter being a Pope or not but I don't have an issue with the idea that he was the leader of the Church to begin with and that Christ placed him in this position.
bibleberean said:There is not a single scripture calling Peter a Pope.
The reason for that is that it is unsriptural.
The RCC has given "Mary" the title "Queen of the Apostles".
The mythological Peter is out shown by the false head of the church of Catholicism.
Mary rules. :-?
Peter was not in Rome, and he did not write in the Bible from Rome. He is buried in Jerusalem where he was the Apostle to the Jews. Paul was in Rome, Paul was the Apostle to the Gentiles in Rome. Paul wrote portions of the scripture while in Rome. Paul never mentions that Peter was in Rome.stray bullet said:Does anyone actually construct their own arguments anymore or do they just cut and paste?
If you want to have a real discussion, then do the following-
Read a source
Read a counter-source
Construct your own argument, without directly copying what the sources said.
Make a topic.
It took you all of 5 seconds to find that site and I'm not going to spend 100x time that amount of time writing up something you are going to ignore anyways.
Peter was in Rome and he wrote from Rome in the bible, it even SAYS SO. Yesh.
None of you are interested in the truth or having an actual discussion. You just want to cut and paste from hateful websites and pretend you are doing the will of God.
Solo said:Peter was not in Rome, and he did not write in the Bible from Rome. He is buried in Jerusalem where he was the Apostle to the Jews. Paul was in Rome, Paul was the Apostle to the Gentiles in Rome. Paul wrote portions of the scripture while in Rome. Paul never mentions that Peter was in Rome.
Solo said:Peter wrote the first book from Babylon. Notice that the audience is the Jews who were scattered from Babylon and the order of nations mentioned in Peter's greeting is ordered from Babylon, not Rome.
First verses of 1 Peter:
1 Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, 2 Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied. 1 Peter 1:1-2
Last verses of 1 Peter:
13 The church that is at Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you; and so doth Marcus my son. 14 Greet ye one another with a kiss of charity. Peace be with you all that are in Christ Jesus. Amen. 1 Peter 5:13-14
There also is no convincing evidence that Rome was called Babylon in code before the Jewish war of 70AD.
Solo said:Well I know that the Babylon of Revelation is Rome, and will eventually be destroyed as prophesied, but Peter was writing to those of the dispersion from the real Babylon, and it is that Babylon that I believe he wrote 1 Peter from.
The verses of scripture in Revelation paint a pretty grim end of Rome:
1 And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: 2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication. 3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. 4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: 5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
Revelation 17:1-5
And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.
Revelation 18:2
Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas, that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.
Revelation 18:10
Babylon was also a real city where the Israelites were dispersed throughout asia from, and that is to whom Peter was writing. God had Paul in Rome and throughout the Mesopotamia region, and Peter was in Jerusalem where he was ministering to the Jews to whom he was called. The Church was persecuted in Rome during Peter's lifetime, and it would have been very dangerous for him to be in Rome. Paul was a Roman citizen and had some priviledges that Peter did not have. Not one time did Paul write of Peter being in Rome, nor did Peter write saying that he visited Paul. I expect that that information would go against the RCC tradition and purpose for hanging on to Peter inspite of the truths revealed in scripture, but if you want to believe that Peter was in Rome and the first bishop of the RCC, knock yourself out. Many of the joint heirs of Jesus Christ that will reign with Him judging even the angels, know better.stray bullet said:Solo said:Well I know that the Babylon of Revelation is Rome, and will eventually be destroyed as prophesied, but Peter was writing to those of the dispersion from the real Babylon, and it is that Babylon that I believe he wrote 1 Peter from.
Babylon was a codeword because of the sensitivity of the letters. If this wasn't the case, Revelation wouldn't have bothered to use it.
The verses of scripture in Revelation paint a pretty grim end of Rome:
1 And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: 2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication. 3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. 4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: 5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
Revelation 17:1-5
And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.
Revelation 18:2
Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas, that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.
Revelation 18:10
Yup- at the time, Rome was the capital of the pagan, sinful empire. It represented the ills of humanity.
The pagan, sinful world will come to an end. How much more Rome represented, we'll have to see.
What we do know is that Rome feel to its knees and died- from the ashes rose Christianity all over the empire in the lands the empire repressed.