NIGHTMARE said:
randy2844 said:
We know the lake of fire was created for satan and his rebellious angels (Matt 25:41). Why wasn't he there, instead of in the garden, instigating the events that produced the corruption and fall of the human race?
Maybe we should address the lake of fire first.....(what do you believe this is??????
It is not a fire thats a literaling burning fire that burns forever that will turture people forever.....
Actually, we know very little about the lake of fire. We know it was created as punishment for the rebel angels, that man, having engaged in the same sin of rebellion against God, is--apart from Salavation--destined for the same punishment, which is referred to as the second death.
We know it is not a literal fire because it is eternal. Even suns eventually burn out.
My personal belief is that the lake of fire is a spiritual state of being. I believe man is a spiritual creature that will exist for eternity, just like the angels. And that we will either dwell with God or apart from Him--those are the only 2 choices. And the only alternative to being with God is the lake of fire.
I believe the second death is complete and total separation from God forever. I think those in the lake of fire will suffer a spiritual torment far worse than eternal fire could inflict. It sounds like those therein will exist in blackness without form or substance, yet retain perception of that eternal damnation, the hopelessness and despair of their plight, and the torment of knowing they could have avoided it.
But my question is, why did the Lord not cast the rebels into the lake of fire--created expressly for that purpose--instead of allowing satan the freedom and opportunity to deceive man?