SilverRope
Member
Long time ago I had a brief debate with my father. Although it was not fully discussed with possibilities or probabilities, I thought it would be an interesting discussion on this board.
My father’s position was in regards to the disciples of Jesus, specifically the first twelve disciples, that they were simple and uneducated men. He made assumptions that they did not know how to read and write. His conclusion, or point, was that the majority of the first disciples were uneducated men and did not know how to read or write.
My counterpoint to that was also an assumption. Although they were simple men and their education level may not have been deep in studying the Scriptures, they were of the Jewish faith which required them to read from the Scriptures when they became of age (bar mitzvah). Second, some of the first disciples had their own businesses, which required them to write. It could also be argued that a couple of them were students of scripture. Third, in order to relate to the lessons Jesus taught them, they had to have some knowledge of what was written in the Scriptures. Jesus knew how to read and write and, although the Pharisees marveled and wondered where He got his education, did have some form of education. Therefore, my counterpoint to the argument was that the majority of the first disciples were educated in some form and knew how to read and write.
What do you think? Do you agree on the first point or the counterpoint, and why? Of the first twelve disciples whom do you consider to be educated when they were chosen, and who was not?
My father’s position was in regards to the disciples of Jesus, specifically the first twelve disciples, that they were simple and uneducated men. He made assumptions that they did not know how to read and write. His conclusion, or point, was that the majority of the first disciples were uneducated men and did not know how to read or write.
My counterpoint to that was also an assumption. Although they were simple men and their education level may not have been deep in studying the Scriptures, they were of the Jewish faith which required them to read from the Scriptures when they became of age (bar mitzvah). Second, some of the first disciples had their own businesses, which required them to write. It could also be argued that a couple of them were students of scripture. Third, in order to relate to the lessons Jesus taught them, they had to have some knowledge of what was written in the Scriptures. Jesus knew how to read and write and, although the Pharisees marveled and wondered where He got his education, did have some form of education. Therefore, my counterpoint to the argument was that the majority of the first disciples were educated in some form and knew how to read and write.
What do you think? Do you agree on the first point or the counterpoint, and why? Of the first twelve disciples whom do you consider to be educated when they were chosen, and who was not?