[__ Science __ ] The Ultimate Scientific Rebuttal to Darwin’s Descent of Man?

[AIG.com]

Breakthrough findings repudiate Darwin with falsifiable and fulfilled predictions—the gold standard of actual scientific research.

Continue reading...

 

[Barbarian]

From AIG:
Apparently, Darwin’s appeals were successful. In the 1869 edition of On the Origin of Species, Darwin’s sentence read differently:

Why, it may be asked, until recently did nearly all the most eminent living naturalists and geologists reject this view of the mutability of species.7 [emphasis added]

But from also from AIG:
Before the time of Charles Darwin, a false idea had crept into the church—the belief in the “fixity” or “immutability” of species. According to this view, each species was created in precisely the same form that we find it today. The Bible nowhere teaches that species are fixed and unchanging.
...
Was the Bible really wrong about species fixity? Contrary to the accepted wisdom of Darwin’s day, the Bible nowhere teaches that species are fixed and unchanging

Do Species Change?

It seems obvious to everyone today that species change.

answersingenesis.org

Seems as though they have trouble deciding what they believe.

 

[Truthfrees]

Breakthrough findings repudiate Darwin with falsifiable and fulfilled predictions—the gold standard of actual scientific research.

Continue reading...

thanks

 

[Barbarian]

You're welcome. AIG seems to have some internal rifts as to evolution. At least some of them now openly admit the evolution of new species, genera, and families of organisms.

Some of them apparently still hold to the strict creationist doctrine.