Heidi said:
Christianity takes about as much work and effort as thanking someone for rescuing us from a burning fire. That is no effort at all, jsut love and tgratitude.
Heidi: I hope that you do not take my disagreements with you personally. And if it turns out that the position that I critique in the following is not
your position (and that I have missed the meaning of your post), than all should understand that what I am saying is not "targeted" at Heidi. And what I am about to say in my next sentence was written
after the rest of my post was written: While I stand by what I wrote in the following, it may not really be related to Heidi's point.
As perhaps the reader will anticipate, I believe that the above statement is not only incorrect, but the pervasive grip this idea has on modern evangelicalism is responsible for many people not taking the church seriously.
To be fair to you, though, I do have
some empathy for the view that we can reasonably have expected God to have made the Scriptures easy to understand. I think the plain reality, though, is that they are not. For some reason, God has forced us to do a lot of hard intellectually taxing work to understand essential points of doctrine. In my view, the Scriptural teaching on matters of such things are predestination and free will are not discernable from an "atomistic" examination of individual texts. Instead, we need to get the "big picture" in order to get at the truth - the Scriptures are not a "reference manual where we seek answers in individual snippets of material.
A classic example is the use (and I would claim incorrect use) of material in Romans 9 to support the notion that persons are pre-destined to either heaven or hell. Here is the text in question:
One of you will say to me: "Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will?" But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, 'Why did you make me like this?' " Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use? What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrathâ€â€prepared for destruction? What if he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory
I think that a proper analysis of this text, informed by the "big picture" is this: God has pre-destined
ethnic Israel to destruction in service of his grand covenant purposes. I will not argue the point here. I simply want to express the view that a "superficial" reading of this text has probably lead people to believe in the notion that God pre-destines individuals to Heaven or hell. While such a position
might be supported
elsewhere in the Scriptures (and I think it isn't), it is not supported here.
So the truth is often much more subtle than we expect.