brother Paul
Member
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
I think the debate persists because so many people just view parts of science as trying to attack their faith. Many people have been told a lot of misinformation about science and science is something that is hard for people that don't keep up with it to understand. Its just a huge mess.Is this debate ever going to end? My belief is that "God did it." Is evolution part of God's plan? Probably, but why would it matter one way or the other? God is sovereign.
You are misrepresenting the point Jackson made (and Talk Origins is the AnswersinGenesis of the EB –ers) what he said was the vein-like tissue was still flexible, not “the Proteins”.
If 80,000,000 years old it should have become brittle at best and all the proteins entirely denatured (a biochemical fact).
Again a misrepresentation…he did not say he was “an expert” but that with his credentials he knows what he is talking about
Secondly you know what they say about people who have to result to name calling to make an impression or allegedly win an argument! In the science of rhetoric,
Yes it does a few very important things. It teaches that the core of real science is to question and that what you are told you should believe is not necessarily ”the truth” (and this goes for all areas of knowledge)
…it teaches to always look beyond what you are told by the so-called “experts” (the appeal to authority fallacy)
Thirdly, and I believe an important point, is why is this the ONLY scientific “school of thought” that has offered so many intentional frauds over and over, and even must be protected by law and made exclusive by LAW?
Geobel’s said “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.
We do not see this principle of propaganda being used by Physics or Chemistry, or even Biology in general,
…only in this area….so what do you suppose the political, economic, or military consequence could mean for the masses?
Sorry Paul I misspoke but there is still a big problem here, Dr. Schweitzer never said she found what Mr. Jackson claims. She never claimed to have found a vein like tissue that was still flexible. There is no article, paper, or journal entry that makes that claim. So Mr. Jackson's argument would be true if what claimed actually happened. Mr. Jackson is the one spreading propaganda.Schweitzer didn't find flexible protein and never claimed to have
You are misrepresenting the point Jackson made (and Talk Origins is the AnswersinGenesis of the EB –ers) what he said was the vein-like tissue was still flexible, not “the Proteins”. If 80,000,000 years old it should have become brittle at best and all the proteins entirely denatured (a biochemical fact). Plus the whole popularized propaganda was pushed on the inquiring minds of the masses as if this was something new (while really an issue ignored until they SIMPLY COOULD NOT)
yammered on about how he is an expert because he taught High school Biology
Yes he does Paul, one minute into the video he stands up and says he is an expert. I'm not misrepresenting anything. Mr. Jackson said it himself 55 seconds onward in the video he makes the claim that he is an expert and that he has a doctorate which makes him an expert. Which is actually an outright lie because I looked up his credentials and his highest 2 degrees is a Masters in Secondary Science Education and a Masters in Environmental Science. That is why I have been referring to him as Mr. Jackson.Again a misrepresentation…he did not say he was “an expert”
Yeah, I'm not touching this with a ten foot poll. Lets keep this on the original topic.Like we learned in the Junk DNA fiasco,
the reason I dismiss the majority of people toting creation science is not because I think that they are stupid or fools.
I'm guessing you didn't google this man's credentials. He works for the Creation Science Institute. He is honored as a Hall of Famer for defending Creation Science.Creation science? What? Yes he is a creationist but he was talking science not “Creationist” science as if there is a new kind of science.
I'm not name calling him, or anyone names. He calls himself one and has accepted Awards under the name, he works for the Creation Science Institute. I see you have to play the same tricks Paul to avoid any criticism. You asked for our opinions, and when we give them you misrepresent us.Secondly you know what they say about people who have to result to name calling to make an impression or allegedly win an argument!
(pardon this sidebar, but this is like how they scampered to explain away how fossils of struggling fish could be trapped in layers that allegedly took thousands of years to form...
or how radio halos could be trapped in granites that we were told over and over for years that took millions of years to form...