Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
The whole Bible teaches that one man should marry one women for life and that all sexual relationships out side of that marriage are wrong.can you say me it
what about when it says there is no marriage in heaven be like the angelsThe whole Bible teaches that one man should marry one women for life and that all sexual relationships out side of that marriage are wrong.
Genesis 2:24 NKJVcan you say me it
Be careful on your wording. It says "they neither marry nor are given in marriage."what about when it says there is no marriage in heaven be like the angels
No. There is nowhere in the bible that precludes marrying more than one woman. The only exception on that is for NT congregational leaders - elders and deacons.The whole Bible teaches that one man should marry one women for life and that all sexual relationships out side of that marriage are wrong.
We know very little about what heaven will be like. It is enough to deal with life on earth withouut making problems speculating about heaven.what about when it says there is no marriage in heaven be like the angels
Clearly you have never read in genesis where it says gen2: 24 That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.No. There is nowhere in the bible that precludes marrying more than one woman.
Of course I read it. But apparently not with the same eyes as you. I am more like Luther than Zwingly on these things. If there is not a specific prohibition, then there is no specific prohibition. While I agree one-man one-woman is the proper guidance, there is nothing in Genesis to say it is a MUST OBEY law.Clearly you have never read in genesis where it says gen2: 24 That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.
A man, that is one man marrying one woman. That is the biblical principal.
That God permitted multiple wives was for a particular purpose, that of maintaining a family line.
it was not as an expression of wealth.
Of course I read it. But apparently not with the same eyes as you. I am more like Luther than Zwingly on these things. If there is not a specific prohibition, then there is no specific prohibition. While I agree one-man one-woman is the proper guidance, there is nothing in Genesis to say it is a MUST OBEY law.
And it is apparent you have not properly read and understood the idea of levirite marriage. (Deut 25)
I can agree with "best pattern to follow." BUT that does not mean it is the ONLY pattern to follow.There is no law in the bible against scams or cons yet most people understand that they are a version of theft.
The apostles understood that it was one man to one women in all there comments about marriage.
Contrast the examples of multiply wifes and concubines in the bible with the unhappy family life and most people would agree one and one is the best pattrn to follow.
God and Jesus, being one, would only have one opinion.can you say me it
ou still have not given your assessment of the idea of levirite marriage (taking a childless widowed sister-in-law as wife) being commanded, even if the brother is already married.
I did. You are talking there about God allowing polygny for various reasons, not the command to take another wife. That is what i was asking you to address.read post no 8.
I believe it means old marriages too.Be careful on your wording. It says "they neither marry nor are given in marriage."
That describes NEW marriages. It says nothing one way or the other about existing marriages.
Matthew 22:30
For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.
Mark 12:25
For when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.
I agree with Who Me regarding the idea that even if the bible does not explicitly forbid something...we can still know it is wrong.I can agree with "best pattern to follow." BUT that does not mean it is the ONLY pattern to follow.
You still have not given your assessment of the idea of levirite marriage (taking a childless widowed sister-in-law as wife) being commanded, even if the brother is already married.
I know many believe that way. But I find no actual biblical support for it.I believe it means old marriages too.
IOW...in heaven there's no such thing as marriage.
Based on what?I agree with Who Me regarding the idea that even if the bible does not explicitly forbid something...we can still know it is wrong.
And it was not that different as recently as 200 years ago, 1800 years after the time of Messiah. What changed? Levirite marriage was never accepted by the church.Regarding taking a widow as wife...in O.T. times a woman had to be married, or taken care of in some other manner, or she would go hungry.
Families took care of each other...this was a way of doing this.
I was referring to the practice of a childless widow being married to the nearest male relative to prolong that family line.I did. You are talking there about God allowing polygny for various reasons, not the command to take another wife. That is what i was asking you to address.
There is a big difference between God allowing something and Him commanding it.