A rather interesting topic indeed. I also find it interesting how much the word “fundamentalist†is used. Take for instance what happened in the Southern Baptist Convention during the late 1970’s and up till 2000, of which has been called many different things. The Liberals in the SBC term the events as the "Fundamentalist Takeover," while the Conservatives in the SBC termed it the "Conservative Resurgence."
Fore more information on that particular subject please click the link given below:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_B ... roversy.22
In any event my understanding of the term Fundamentalist comes from my study in both Church history (in College) and Baptist History (In Seminary). Another key factor in my understanding of the term of course comes from my various searches on the internet.
As I understand it during the late 19th century and early 20th century there was quite an influx in Liberal Theology. In reaction to that influx many Conservative Christians ‘“…actively affirmed a "fundamental" set of Christian beliefs: the inerrancy of the Bible, the virgin birth of Christ, the doctrine of substitutionary atonement, the bodily resurrection of Jesus, and the authenticity of his miracles.â€Â’
(Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamenta ... ristianity)
Also note worth is the following form Wikipedia.com:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamenta ... ristianity
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The original formulation of American fundamentalist beliefs can be traced to the Niagara Bible Conference (1878–1897) and, in 1910, to the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church which distilled these into what became known as the "five fundamentals":
Inerrancy of the Scriptures
The virgin birth and the deity of Jesus
The doctrine of substitutionary atonement through God's grace and human faith
The bodily resurrection of Jesus
The authenticity of Christ's miracles (or, alternatively, his premillennial second coming)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course I’m also aware of the current usage of the term. As I understand it the current usage of the term is often applied to those who are viewed as very legalistic.
So is a Christian Fundamentalist a:
Person who accepts the “five fundamentalsâ€Â
Conservative Christian
“Someone with extreme right political viewâ€Â
“A judgemental, bigoted Christianâ€Â
“Someone who forces the faith on othersâ€Â
To be honest I don’t know how to answer that question. Like beauty I think it is in the eye of the beholder.
By the way I agree with the “five fundamentals,†so does that make me a Christian Fundamentalist? I also could be consider a Conservative Christianâ€â€so does that make me a Christian Fundamentalist†On the other hand I don’t have “extreme right political views,†and I neither force my faith on others or am judgmental and a bigoted Christian (Of course, in rference to “bigoted Christian,†the fact that I don’t condone homosexuality and consider it a sin may make someone think other wise).