Grazer
Member
- Jun 22, 2012
- 1,955
- 1
Ok, lets put the issue of inerrancy to one side (a conversation I'm apparently too unlearned to contribute to anyway) and look at the issue of God breathed.
We all know what 2 Timothy 3:16 says;
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,
But following a Facebook post this afternoon, it's got me thinking about the whole nature of scripture being God-breathed;
Just had a thought...most of us are aware that the word "inspired" in the letter to Timothy ("all scripture is inspired") is literally "God-breathed". And that has led to the teaching that it is literally "the Word of God".
Is it possible that what the author was saying, though, is that God breathes into those writings? Similar, perhaps, in a metaphorical way to him breathing life into man...
So, not breathing them OUT, but breathing INTO them...
Now, I know this is all linked to inerrency but I just want to focus on the possible meanings of this passage. The ramifications of such interpretations on inerrency can wait.
We all know what 2 Timothy 3:16 says;
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,
But following a Facebook post this afternoon, it's got me thinking about the whole nature of scripture being God-breathed;
Just had a thought...most of us are aware that the word "inspired" in the letter to Timothy ("all scripture is inspired") is literally "God-breathed". And that has led to the teaching that it is literally "the Word of God".
Is it possible that what the author was saying, though, is that God breathes into those writings? Similar, perhaps, in a metaphorical way to him breathing life into man...
So, not breathing them OUT, but breathing INTO them...
Now, I know this is all linked to inerrency but I just want to focus on the possible meanings of this passage. The ramifications of such interpretations on inerrency can wait.