• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

What Will Windows 7 Look Like?

Lewis

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2005
Messages
15,483
Reaction score
621
What Will Windows 7 Look Like?
Microsoft hasn't said what features will be in Windows 7, but analysts have some ideas of their own.

By now, everyone has heard how Microsoft Corp. plans to release the next Windows client OS, Windows 7, in 2010. But what the company is not making clear is what new features the OS will have, a topic that has become fodder for educated speculation.

Analysts said Microsoft probably is keeping tight-lipped about what Windows 7 will look like because at this point, company engineers and executives don't even know.

"They don't want to commit because they don't have a good idea what's in it," said Michael Silver, an analyst with Gartner Inc. "We're three years out, so you can't really expect that much detail."

Michael Cherry, an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, said with so many people still in the midst of upgrading to the latest client OS, Windows Vista, he's hesitant to speculate on what might be in the next OS. "We barely know the features of the one we just got," he said with a laugh.

That said, Cherry is expecting less "earth-shattering" new features than improvements on some of the new ones found in Windows Vista, such as the Bitlocker encryption feature, which is currently hard for the average PC user to navigate.

"You have to partition your hard drive and do a bunch of things, and you can only really today protect one drive, whereas many machines have more than one," he said.

Cherry also pointed to a common hardware performance problem many users face because of Vista's "very large footprint." "It's one of the things they might want to address -- hardware utilization and performance," he said. "It's hard to put a big wrapper around that; it just needs to be better."

One Microsoft executive gave a slight hint about what might turn up in Windows 7 earlier this year at the RSA Conference in San Francisco. Ben Fathi, corporate vice president of development with Microsoft's Windows Core Operating System Division, said in an interview that a "fundamental piece of enabling technology," such as a hypervisor or a drastic change in the user interface, would likely turn up in Windows 7.

Fathi also said at RSA in February that Microsoft was in the middle of the planning process for Windows 7's features and would know more over the next few months, which suggests the company now has a good idea what the OS will look like but is declining to disclose that information.

While both a hypervisor and a new user interface are possibilities for Windows 7, the former is almost a given, Gartner's Silver said. "It almost has to go" in the OS, he said, describing the technology as "a really thin OS" that manages virtual machines running on the system.

It would behoove Microsoft to put a hypervisor in Windows 7 because it would give them more control over the hardware the OS runs on, something the company would prefer to have, Silver said.

"The hypervisor really owns the hardware, and Microsoft likes owning the hardware and they want to be one of the people to standardize [hypervisor technology]," he said.

Vista includes new features such as desktop search and a new user interface, which also are two areas that leave room for expansion in Windows 7, analysts said.

Microsoft has shown the direction it's going with the latter with its Surface computer, introduced in late May. That form factor looks like a coffee table with a touchscreen interface that lets users move photos around by hand synchronize devices by placing them on the table.

With products such as the Apple iPhone making the touchscreen popular with consumers, a touchscreen UI in Windows 7 is a possibility, Silver said. "They don't want to look bad next to Apple," he said.

Desktop search, a new feature built into Vista, also has room for improvement. Microsoft has said it will link desktop search to Windows Server 2008 so desktop users can search not only for local files, but also for files on the server. This is a feature that potentially could be built into the desktop OS.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,135206/article.html
 
First they need to get Vista right!

Microsoft needs to concentrate on the most important issues, like hardware and software compatibility, including backwards compatibility. Leave all the fancy add-ons to the real programmers ... the hackers. :-D Some of the best add-ons and plug-ins I've seen for Fire Fox, for instance, were written by these "amateurs".
 
vic C. said:
First they need to get Vista right!

Microsoft needs to concentrate on the most important issues, like hardware and software compatibility, including backwards compatibility. Leave all the fancy add-ons to the real programmers ... the hackers. :-D Some of the best add-ons and plug-ins I've seen for Fire Fox, for instance, were written by these "amateurs".

And speaking of backwards compatibility, they still need to get XP right. Although my kid's computers and this one had XP Pro for quite some time now, I only switch from windows 98SE on my own computer this past March----- and to this very day I still dislike XP.

Some examples of irritating problems----- my astronomy program that once could remember my location and one's I added does not work right in XP. I have to reenter that stuff each time----98SE no problem.

My photo software occasionally wants me to register it when I start it up (and when I do it crashes)----- something that never happened in windows 98SE

When my kid plays his x-box, my computer knocks off saying "network cable is unplugged" and it knocks his off as well, so I can't use my own computer when he plays (which so happens to be most of the time). 98SE, no problem. I think this is an IP address conflict issue---- purely software from an XP quirk that I should try to solve.

The reason I switch to this problematic OS was simple----- 98SE is not supported any longer, nor is anyone interested in updating freeware programs for it in the event my hard drive would crash, I could not replace these programs easily. But I surely miss 98SE.

Now---- I understand that Vista has the same attitudinal problems XP had with certain hardware. And they are talking Windows 7 now? Eeeeek! Take me back to 1999!
 
Can't say I'm all that interested in Vista or Xp for that matter.
I have six computers and only two have windows on them. Both are being used for specific software. One has Sonar 6 which will not run in linux. and the other is a laptop for the kids running photoshop (they may switch once they become more familier with the GIMP program.) I personally have not used windows in a couple of years. I would love to try mac but I don't have the funds for that. But at least my software is secure.
Anyway all that is to say I don't think I'll be going back to windows ever. So windows 7 will not be of any interest. The two computers will not be running vista anytime soon.


Peace V :my friends:
 
Well yes 98 and 98SE are still good OS. I still keep a 98 OS on a hard drive' even still have a 95 on a hard drive. But now I have been use to using XP Pro for about 3 years or more. And I like it. Now Windows 2000 Pro' was nice I had that for a while. Now when they get finish getting all the bugs out of Vista' I will get it. Unless I can't wait. But I do want to get me a Mac.
 
Back
Top