manimal2878 said:
Plus I think the concept that we have of marriage today did not exist in biblical times but was developed in the 11th century ad. I have been told that marriage in those day just meant someone you were committed to, or had been given to as property if you were a woman, after all the old testament is pretty clear that polygamy is fine. Didn't David have like hundreds of wives and all?
Hi- you have been misinformed about a couple of things.
First, the scriptures bear out that Christ, quoting Genesis 2:24, said the following:
Have ye not read, that he which made [them] at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
The Christians IMMEDIATELY understood this to mean that Christ disallowed divorce and polygamy
Secondly, by the time of Tertullian, late second century, the Church was already officially blessing and sanctioning marriages, and the marriage rite that we use to this day in the Orthodox Church took shape long before Constantine.
manimal2878 said:
Also the common reference is Corinthians but, wasn't that a specific sermon to a specific church? And it seems the writer advocated people not getting married unless they had already been having sex. He didn't want them to marry so they would be "clean" for the return of jesus which he thought would be in there lifetimes, or it seems to me anyway. So if we follow this advice christians would soon die out from not getting married and waiting for the return.
Actually, Paul advocated for the single life so that those who followed Christ could do so with singular focus. However, knowing that not all were called to such an ascetic existence, Paul stated that it was better to marry than struggle with overwhelming human passions. In so saying, he was not denigrating marriage, simply placing it as second in glory to the life devoted to Christ only.
manimal2878 said:
This is why i have so much trouble with believing it seems you can read so many things in different ways, and how do i know the current accepted church teaching is right? After all Luther rejected his current church teaching in favor of what he thought was right using his reason. What if we are expected to do the same? How can we know? I guess I will be told to listen to what god tells me, but God is silent to me. And trust me NObody looks harder than an somebody who faces eternal nothing if what they think is true or hell if what they see is wrong.
I understand what you are saying, and I urge you to consider the Church's teachings on morality for one reason above all: I can tell you that sexuality within the bounds of marriage- loving marriage- is worth waiting for. How do I know? Because I did not wait. After marrying my wife, and then each of us struggling with the baggage of past relationships for years, we finally broke through to mature, married love, and I can tell you that sex outside of marriage vs sex in marriage isn't beer vs champagne- it's a meal of filet mignon vs a mouthful of cardboard (the filet mignon being marriage, of course).
Jesus made the intent of God regarding sex and marriage very clear. This commandment to fealty and exclusiviy between one man and one woman is not prudishness, nor is it anti-sexual- on the contrary, it is God's directive toward a blissful life.
God bless you
James