Novum said:
And if such a rational basis could be had, you'd think we'd have come across it in 2000 years of trying. ;)
There are ten manuscripts copied about 1,000 years after Julius Ceasar wrote them but no one disputes that Julius Ceasar existed. The manuscript evidence for the Bible is much much better than that.
There is a whole lot of other reference material that existed independently of Rome that confirms that Caesar existed. This is not the case with the bible .
The Bible is entirely true because of fulfilled prophecy, true because of its preservation, true because of transformed lives, and true because of archaeological proof.
The bible has been shown to be riddled with many errors and those that claim otherwise are denying what is there to see. There are very few evidences of fulfilled prophecy in the bible. Many of the prophecies were not considered prophecy at the time of reading it. They were made to be prophecy at a later date. PM me and I will explain. It is true that the bible has transformed peoples lives but so has the Koran Buddhism Hinduism etc. It proves nothing other than when people have something to devote their lives to more positive things occur. People have turned their likes around by getting an education and finding rewarding work, started business they loved, sports etc.