Interesting. Clarifying that blacks would not likely consider it racist if a white candidate did what Michele did today was a problem for you. Clearly defining racism as something that goes beyond a, "I don't like you thing" but rather as a systematic device used to control, harass, and dehumanize others wasn't to your liking either.
Your entire argument and/or problem with the original post is about as deluded and backwards as it can get at this point.Lets review.
The point was made that its hypocritical for michelle to call on black churches for votes,meanwhile if other candidates ask their churches to do the same,someone always cries wolf and pulls the race card.
Perhaps reading comprehension isnt your strong suit,as you seem to enjoy twisting words and slinging unfounded accusations,particularly where race is concerned.
If the truth about the nature of racism bothers you then, maybe you have issues to deal with. It's not a word to toss around lightly every time groups of people don't like each other. And a few lines about the horrors and effects of racism can hardly be considered ranting can it? Should we obscure the truth because it offends you?
The truth about racism is that its one of the most ridiculous and useless aspects of any society.And,while I agree with the sentiment that its not a word to toss around lightly,I find it interesting that you do so with alarming ease..even to the point of stating that anyone who disagrees with our current pres hates him on the basis of race.Its much more effective to oppose something if you dont actively engage in what you condemn.
Also,if youre such a fan of free speech why should I temper my comments on your behalf?Could it be that you wish to silence my opinion or bully me into submission because the truth offends you?
I'm sure there are very good reason for people to [hate?] dislike the President. But the venom directed towards this President is different...it's like as was said on CNN, "the elephant in the Rose Garden." It would be unwise to pretend that many can't stand him based soley on his race. And it would be refreshing if those that felt that way owned it. Again, not an accusation but an oberservation based on how often racism is consistenly brought into the conversation.
But of course, if someone suggests this they are, again, accused of playing the race card....predictable.
Correct,there are many reasons people dont like him.He was involved with racist churches.Both he and his wife have made numerous anti-american comments.He masquerades as a christian but refuses to acknowledge the traditional national day of prayer,then follows with a muslim display he was more than happy to take part in.His economical decisions are reckless.On goes the list.
True,there are many out there who dont like him based on race alone.Noone here tried to dismiss that or pretend it doesnt exist.Thats also something that to a degree he should expect considering his past affiliation with certain organizations and his own comments.
As for the comment that he has received far more intense criticism than any before him..correct.And he deserves every bit of it.Although youd rather believe again that hes a victim of color alone,such is not the case.There has never before been such an openly anti-american politician in office.The man refuses to acknowledge the pledge of allegiance.He apologizes to muslim countries for us simply being what we are and continues to undermine everything this country has stood for in years past.Despite the fact that this country was founded on christian principles and owes its prosperity to that, he has taken it upon himself to declare that we are no longer a christian country,nevermind the fact that the majority feels otherwise.He pushes legislation under the table,and when discovered makes excuses for it while making no move to reverse the process.His administration attempts to silence the church,except when he thinks it may work in his favor.And this is just scratching the surface.But go ahead,blame it on racism again..I guess thats much easier to do than own up to the fact that he is easily the most anti-american,anti-family,anti-religion and racist president this country has seen to date.His existence isnt despised,I wouldnt credit him for being that significant.His own actions have earned him the disrespect that will hopefully work against him come November.
Is that just guilt talking? The name-calling reference was to your clueless comment towards me. In terms of being comfortable...I am very thanks... but don't think because others refuse to speak out and be berated for their opinions that other opinions don't exist.
Guilt in what,pray tell? I never called you a name,so on this Ill ask that you provide a quote to back that up.I have no shame or guilt associated with the fact that while you profess to take the high road while feigning indifference,youre obviously so intent on turning this into a hate debate that youve allowed yourself the luxury of imagining comments that didnt take place.Ive openly stated that your position on much of this is quite irrational.So rest assured,Im comfortable stating that.
But of course I could be wrong...after all you speak for the majority.
Blessings,
Dee
Yes,you are wrong on many of your assumptions/accusations..Im glad you made room for that.
I speak only for myself here.What was stated,and twisted by yourself,is the fact that many others in the country have reservations on concerning the current state of the union.
