Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

Bible Study Question: Did Jesus Christ Have Two Natures?

Donations

Total amount
$1,592.00
Goal
$5,080.00
I believe that Jesus was PERFECT. Whether or not He had a human nature matters not because He was and is, PERFECT. Now, all the fuss about two natures of the Son of God, Jesus, in this verse and those like it....Hebrews 4:14 "Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession.
4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin."

Again, Jesus, the Son of God, was perfect holiness and could not sin. The reason that Jesus was in all points tempted like as we are, was not that He had a human sin nature, but that God the Son, as our Forerunner, experienced all that Satan threw at Him and, as our example, sinned not.

You asked, "how can Jesus be tempted just like us when His divine nature makes Him not like us?" My answer is; we are the ones who have two natures, and because of that, Jesus' nature was not polluted by a human sin nature. Jesus is not like us because He doesn't have a human sin nature. Jesus animated a human body like ours, the main reason was to take it to the cross. Jesus needed a body to house perfect divine Blood to be shed for the remission of our sins.

Now, what is a human nature that many believe was in Christ Jesus? It is a sin nature passed to us from Adam. Jesus had no sin nature and that's why He did not sin.
for some reason i have always seen Jesus different than most. to me He seems to teach He is one of us, if I can do it you can do it. how many times did Jesus have to bail out His disciples when they couldnt complete a task, He always seems disappointed and telling them their faith is lacking, suggesting He expects them to do the same works as He does, how can we ever do what Jesus does if He is not one of us?. He always says the works He does is not of His own but of the Father that sent Him.
 
I don't think anyone here believes Jesus had a human 'sin' nature, just a human nature. The propensity to sin comes to us from our father Adam. Jesus had no sin, Adam was not His father.
Adam is certainly listed in the lineage of Jesus, Luke 3:38.
 
I don't think anyone here believes Jesus had a human 'sin' nature, just a human nature. The propensity to sin comes to us from our father Adam. Jesus had no sin, Adam was not His father.

I understand Deb. My whole argument hinges on just what is a human nature? From my understanding, you can't have a human nature that is free from sin. A human nature comes from Adam to us, and it is sinful. Therefore, a human nature is a Human sin nature and Jesus did not have a sinful nature.

Someone will have to explain to me, with Scripture, how it was that Jesus was able to have a human nature without being tainted by sin.
 
I understand Deb. My whole argument hinges on just what is a human nature? From my understanding, you can't have a human nature that is free from sin. A human nature comes from Adam to us, and it is sinful. Therefore, a human nature is a Human sin nature and Jesus did not have a sinful nature.

Someone will have to explain to me, with Scripture, how it was that Jesus was able to have a human nature without being tainted by sin.

IN the light of sin being of the devil chopper, it may be void to not see the other party and our subjection to same in the flesh. 1 John 3:8

Jesus did not have that same "subjection."

John 14:30
Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

The balance of us however DO have that engagement with the prince being spoken of by Jesus above.

Eph. 2:
2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

It is the "spirit of disobedience" that makes humans sinners. That doesn't mean the human nature, apart from that working of another, that prince, is itself inherently sinful.

It's a two party system when it comes to sin. Not just a sight of man or human nature. The demonic nature of the DEVIL is quite thoroughly involved with sin.

When the prince of this world is eliminated from the equations of humanity, which IS a promise of the Gospel, there will be no sinners. Here we can see the end result:

Matt. 13:
41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.
 
I understand Deb. My whole argument hinges on just what is a human nature?
Words, words, words... Reminds me of the guy who was searching for a perfect word in order to express a difficult concept. Giving up, he exclaimed,
"It's all Semitics anyway."

But I do have a point here (somewhere). Because this is not an argument. Not here in 'Christian Growth' and not in our hearts. But what is going on here? We are practicing perspective. 'One eye' or 'one view' only means that we necessarily lose perspective. But when we are able to look through the eyes of another and consider their thoughts and dreams and concepts? Then the danger of myopic theology is diminished.

Wherever there are two of you, joined... There also...

Come, Lord. Teach us. We need you, Rabbi so that we may become more like You.
<< "... by my Spirit," saith the LORD >>
 
Someone will have to explain to me, with Scripture, how it was that Jesus was able to have a human nature without being tainted by sin.

1 John 4:2-3 (LEB) By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God, and this is the spirit of the antichrist, of which you have heard that it is coming, and now it is already in the world.

Philippians 2:5-8 (LEB) Think this in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, who, existing in the form of God, did not consider being equal with God something to be grasped, but emptied himself by taking the form of a slave, by becoming in the likeness of people. And being found in appearance like a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, that is, death on a cross.

Poof, Jesus had a human 'nature' to include death.

Adam's nature was not created sinful.

Genesis 2:25 (LEB) And the man and his wife, both of them, were naked, and they were not ashamed.

Adam, later, fell into sin. His 'nature', however, was born/formed in the image of God. Adam was, at his creation, was a son of God.

Luke 3:38 (LEB) ... the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.

Jesus didn't fall (sin). That doesn't mean He wasn't a human.

There is no Biblical conflict with Jesus taking on human nature. That is, the nature that it was originally created as (good, unashamed).

http://www.reasonablefaith.org/defenders-2-podcast/transcript/s6-1
 
In my morning devotions and study, I read a statement by John Gill, one of my favorite Theologians, the following....He that descended is the same also that ascended,.... His remarks was based on, Ephesians 4:10 "He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things."

Gill - "It was the same divine Person, the Son of God, who assumed human nature, and suffered in it, which is meant by his descent, who in that nature ascended up to heaven: this proves that Christ existed before he took flesh of the virgin; and that though he has two natures, yet he is but one person.

I don't think that I've ever read anywhere that Jesus Christ, while incarnated in human form, had two natures. Am I wrong?
Hi Brother Chopper - Your OP on the nature of Christ is a highly important issue and one IMO which has been more mysterious than understood! Good subject! I believe Gill and others describe the two natures as that of the body being one, and that of the soul's desires being the second, but this IMO is only conjecture on my part because I haven't seen anyone clear enough on their explanation of their meaning for "nature," other than certain dictionary terminology (i.e. "flesh" Greek; the sinful nature of man).

It being intangible is difficult to affix or assign a definite description, such as the soul, some say it is the reasoning or decision making element of the mind of a person, some say it's something else, thus the true meaning of soul and nature are not necessarily clear.

I believe Gill is referring to the body and the soul. Thus if this be accurate I understand it that the bodies nature is "infirmity" because it is subject to the soul's decision concerning sin. Hence Gill's collation of the body and nature: "who assumed human nature, and suffered in it, which is meant by his descent, who in that nature ascended up to heaven." Suffering can only refer to as in the mind and body, not in the nature, which is either sinful or holy.

Hence Gill's illusion to the subject that Christ suffered in the body (physical flesh) in His descent; and the illusion to His ascent in that nature, e.g. also ascending in the nature or element of a physical body, but of course not with the same properties. To me in this sense the body does not qualify as a nature, leaving only one nature but consisting of two strains--sinful or holy, and in Christ's case divine, which is also holy. Thus the Lord Jesus had and has only one nature--divine.

IMO, many are confusing nature with the infirmity of the body, i.e. Christ "was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin" (Heb 4:15). Tempted is the issue here so it requires defining, and in this text is means tested with physical difficulty, not inclined to do evil, which is the other definition for temptation. Thus, the attempt to collate "infirmity" with "nature" can arise from "we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities" (infirm: sufferings of the mind and body).

My conclusion (not claiming my explanation is sufficient for anyone but at least myself for the present) is that the Lord Jesus only had and has one nature, unlike the believer having two, and the unbeliever having one. Concerning the believer's new nature ("new man"), I see it is how we are "partakers of the divine nature," which is Christ's nature because the implanted new nature in those reborn is created after His nature or "image" (Col 3:10).

But being partakers does not design the intention of possessing divinity itself in the believer but merely "partakers" of it, e.g. recipients of what it provides, which is chiefly that of permanent desire (nature) for God's pleasure, which is always Christ's chief desire (Jhn 5:30). This is the same for being recipients of the present and "everlasting covenant" (Heb 13:20) that is between the Son and the Father, meaning They are the only One's under the New Covenant, and man is the recipient of it.

Hope I didn't get too carried away here. Just attempting to share my opinion as open as possible.

Together Forever
NC
 
IN the light of sin being of the devil chopper, it may be void to not see the other party and our subjection to same in the flesh. 1 John 3:8

Jesus did not have that same "subjection."

John 14:30
Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

The balance of us however DO have that engagement with the prince being spoken of by Jesus above.

Eph. 2:
2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

It is the "spirit of disobedience" that makes humans sinners. That doesn't mean the human nature, apart from that working of another, that prince, is itself inherently sinful.

It's a two party system when it comes to sin. Not just a sight of man or human nature. The demonic nature of the DEVIL is quite thoroughly involved with sin.

When the prince of this world is eliminated from the equations of humanity, which IS a promise of the Gospel, there will be no sinners. Here we can see the end result:

Matt. 13:
41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Smaller, If I go by this verse that you suggested....1Johnn 3:8 "He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil."....Then Mark 4:15 is null and void because Satan's thievery of the Word of God doesn't happen. Right?
 
Smaller, If I go by this verse that you suggested....1Johnn 3:8 "He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil."....Then Mark 4:15 is null and void because Satan's thievery of the Word of God doesn't happen. Right?
Theft is a sin. Satan steals Word. Thoughts against the law(s) are sin. Satan resists Word. Sin is a progression from thought to word to deed.

The point of the observation is that sin is not the human nature. The human nature is fouled by the demonic nature, being made subject to same. As God Jesus was not made subject to the prince of this world, who had nothing in Him.

We should not think of the human nature as the source of sin. The source of sin is the spirit of disobedience. It is an adverse (spirit) spiritual internal matter.

Here's how it all went down, and still goes down:

Romans 11:32
For God has bound everyone over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.

Eph. 2:
2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

Mark 4:
15 And these are they by the way side, where the word is sown; but when they have heard, Satan cometh immediately, and taketh away the word that was sown in their hearts.

All of the above are the same presentation.
 
I don't think anyone here believes Jesus had a human 'sin' nature, just a human nature. The propensity to sin comes to us from our father Adam. Jesus had no sin, Adam was not His father.

You have brought out some good points. Jesus did not have Adams nature because Adam was not His Father.
My understanding is that God intended for all mankind to live by a nature.
Humanity recieved the wrong nature at the fall and had to live with it, until the cross.
We still deal with the residue of the old way of doing things.
Trained by the sin-nature, the mind is like a computer that retains what is put in it.
Through the Law given by God, the mind was able to control or suppress the sin nature.
The mind is a controller still, but the nature of the born again need not be controlled. It needs compatibility with the mind.
Our Father trust's the nature in the born again, He gave them His nature to be their nature, they can yield to the new life-nature and the teaching of the HolySpirit.
Until compatibility comes to the believer, life can be full of struggle and misery untold.
 
Last edited:
Mark 4:
15 And these are they by the way side, where the word is sown; but when they have heard, Satan cometh immediately, and taketh away the word that was sown in their hearts.
This happens in hardened hearts, like a trodden down path. The parable says the theft of the word in their case results in them not being able to be saved by that word. Their hearts will not allow them to receive the word and be saved:

"12“Those beside the road are those who have heard; then the devil comes and takes away the word from their heart, so that they will not believe and be saved." (Luke 8:12 NASB)

So we know Jesus is not talking about satan stealing the word out of believer's hearts. These are people who are unable to be saved because of the condition of their heart. And so it is in the other soil: It is the condition of the soil that determines the outcome of the word.

Believers, who continue to believe, have the Holy Spirit to guard the word in their hearts:

"13Retain the standard of sound words which you have heard from me, in the faith and love which are in Christ Jesus. 14Guard, through the Holy Spirit who dwells in us, the treasure which has been entrusted to you." (2 Timothy 1:13-14 NASB italics in original, bold mine)

Satan can't touch nothing I won't let him touch. The soil of my heart has to cast the word out, first, before satan can snatch it away. IOW, I have to reject the word in unbelief in order for satan to steal it. Loss of the word is synonymous with being lost.

"you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you" (1 Corinthians 15:2 NASB bold mine)
 
This happens in hardened hearts, like a trodden down path. The parable says the theft of the word in their case results in them not being able to be saved by that word. Their hearts will not allow them to receive the word and be saved:

It happens to all. There are no exceptions. Matt. 4:4, Luke 4:4.

We don't get to slice out the Words we don't care for and toss them aside. They ALL apply to ALL of us. Believers who think the parable of Mark 4 doesn't apply to them on every count is not reading accurately, and are being actively stolen from, per Mark 4:15.

Jesus even employs very clear connecting verbiage to hammer home the points when He says "and these are they." Meaning the people in part one go on to the next statement:

15 And these are they by the way side, where the word is sown; but when they have heard, Satan cometh immediately, and taketh away the word that was sown in their hearts.

16 And these are they likewise which are sown on stony ground; who, when they have heard the word, immediately receive it with gladness;
17 And have no root in themselves, and so endure but for a time: afterward, when affliction or persecution ariseth for the word's sake, immediately they are offended.

18 And these are they which are sown among thorns; such as hear the word,
19 And the cares of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, and the lusts of other things entering in, choke the word, and it becometh unfruitful.

20 And these are they which are sown on good ground; such as hear the word, and receive it, and bring forth fruit, some thirtyfold, some sixty, and some an hundred.

And of course, Satan, wily as that being is, will instantly claim that Mark 4:15 doesn't apply, and will SHOOT the believers mind down, instantly, into the last state only in Mark 4:20, actively STEALING all the other facts from their HEADS.
 
Concerning mans nature, it needs no outside influence to be and do evil, thus guilt is always self-incurred. Satan merely exacerbates our own sinful nature!
 
Concerning mans nature, it needs no outside influence to be and do evil, thus guilt is always self-incurred. Satan merely exacerbates our own sinful nature!

It's inside influence. We don't "see" the spirit of disobedience, but it IS a spirit and it IS connected, directly, to Satan, the prince of the power of the air:

Ephesians 2:2
Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

There is no avoiding the connection, that "sin is of the devil."

1 John 3:8
He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.

There is NO SIN that is NOT of the devil. Blaming "human nature only" is not how scripture sees these matters. Sin is a direct cause of the spirit of disobedience, Satan. The human nature is blinded by the "god of this world" in the unsaved. 2 Cor. 4:4, Acts 26:18.

When we look at unsaved "humans" we should not see "just humans." We see them and we see their spirit of disobedience CAPTOR, when we are looking as we are directed to look by the Spirit. We should even see our own sin in the same way, as connected to the spirit of disobedience. Sin is not a sight of MAN ONLY. Never!

When we look at Jesus, in the scriptures, we are not seeing a human, blinded in mind by the god of this world. We are seeing a human nature FREE of that blinding influence and Gods Own Nature, in complete Divine Harmony. There is no logically saying God in Christ was NOT human, because Jesus was assuredly as human as any one of us, except for one VERY IMPORTANT DISTINCTION:

The prince of this world had NOTHING "in Him." None of us can truthfully make that same claim.
 
Adam is certainly listed in the lineage of Jesus, Luke 3:38.
Not in his paternal line.
In the man Adam all have sinned, not in the woman Eve all have sinned.

Jesus was called the Son of Mankind because He was born the seed of the woman. Jesus was the Only Begotten Son of God. He was not a son of the man, Adam. Jesus did not have two fathers. He was the son of a woman and God. There is only room for one mother and one father.

Gen 3:15 and enmity I put between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; he doth bruise thee--the head, and thou dost bruise him--the heel.'
 
I understand Deb. My whole argument hinges on just what is a human nature? From my understanding, you can't have a human nature that is free from sin. A human nature comes from Adam to us, and it is sinful. Therefore, a human nature is a Human sin nature and Jesus did not have a sinful nature.

Someone will have to explain to me, with Scripture, how it was that Jesus was able to have a human nature without being tainted by sin.
See post #95 please. That is the best that I can explain what I understand from scripture.
I am open to correction if I can see it explained with scripture. I should have added the scripture from Romans to my own post!
 
for some reason i have always seen Jesus different than most. to me He seems to teach He is one of us, if I can do it you can do it. how many times did Jesus have to bail out His disciples when they couldnt complete a task, He always seems disappointed and telling them their faith is lacking, suggesting He expects them to do the same works as He does, how can we ever do what Jesus does if He is not one of us?. He always says the works He does is not of His own but of the Father that sent Him.
Jesus never expected man to be like Him by the works of the flesh, "If I can do it, you can do it," It was never have faith that you can do it too, it was faith in Jesus the Christ and His works. Yes, Jesus was an example of how one should live, but it was never a means to salvation by imitating Christ. Change came by rebirth of the Holy Spirit, when we became a new man, when we had faith in the work of Christ and when we recognized our Adamic nature ( Gal. 5:16-17) (Romans Chapters 7 & 8). God is going to destroy man as he is and the earth that man has polluted as He proclaimed in the beginning.(Gen. 6:5-8) That is what Salvation is, saved from the wrath of God. And the everlasting Gospel will destroy all those who are not His, Creating a new heaven and earth. (Rev. 14:6-7) (Rev. 21:1-8) (2 Cor. 5:14-21). We do not belong here. I'am not at home here (Heb. 11:13-16) Really!
 
Jesus never expected man to be like Him by the works of the flesh, "If I can do it, you can do it," It was never have faith that you can do it too, it was faith in Jesus the Christ and His works. Yes, Jesus was an example of how one should live, but it was never a means to salvation by imitating Christ. Change came by rebirth of the Holy Spirit, when we became a new man, when we had faith in the work of Christ and when we recognized our Adamic nature ( Gal. 5:16-17) (Romans Chapters 7 & 8). God is going to destroy man as he is and the earth that man has polluted as He proclaimed in the beginning.(Gen. 6:5-8) That is what Salvation is, saved from the wrath of God. And the everlasting Gospel will destroy all those who are not His, Creating a new heaven and earth. (Rev. 14:6-7) (Rev. 21:1-8) (2 Cor. 5:14-21). We do not belong here. I'am not at home here (Heb. 11:13-16) Really!
Mark 9 17-19
17 And someone from the crowd answered him, “Teacher, I brought my son to you, for he has a spirit that makes him mute. 18 And whenever it seizes him, it throws him down, and he foams and grinds his teeth and becomes rigid. So I asked your disciples to cast it out, and they were not able.” 19 And he answered them, “O faithless generation, how long am I to be with you? How long am I to bear with you?
 
Hi Brother Chopper - Your OP on the nature of Christ is a highly important issue and one IMO which has been more mysterious than understood! Good subject! I believe Gill and others describe the two natures as that of the body being one, and that of the soul's desires being the second, but this IMO is only conjecture on my part because I haven't seen anyone clear enough on their explanation of their meaning for "nature," other than certain dictionary terminology (i.e. "flesh" Greek; the sinful nature of man).

It being intangible is difficult to affix or assign a definite description, such as the soul, some say it is the reasoning or decision making element of the mind of a person, some say it's something else, thus the true meaning of soul and nature are not necessarily clear.

I believe Gill is referring to the body and the soul. Thus if this be accurate I understand it that the bodies nature is "infirmity" because it is subject to the soul's decision concerning sin. Hence Gill's collation of the body and nature: "who assumed human nature, and suffered in it, which is meant by his descent, who in that nature ascended up to heaven." Suffering can only refer to as in the mind and body, not in the nature, which is either sinful or holy.

Hence Gill's illusion to the subject that Christ suffered in the body (physical flesh) in His descent; and the illusion to His ascent in that nature, e.g. also ascending in the nature or element of a physical body, but of course not with the same properties. To me in this sense the body does not qualify as a nature, leaving only one nature but consisting of two strains--sinful or holy, and in Christ's case divine, which is also holy. Thus the Lord Jesus had and has only one nature--divine.

IMO, many are confusing nature with the infirmity of the body, i.e. Christ "was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin" (Heb 4:15). Tempted is the issue here so it requires defining, and in this text is means tested with physical difficulty, not inclined to do evil, which is the other definition for temptation. Thus, the attempt to collate "infirmity" with "nature" can arise from "we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities" (infirm: sufferings of the mind and body).

My conclusion (not claiming my explanation is sufficient for anyone but at least myself for the present) is that the Lord Jesus only had and has one nature, unlike the believer having two, and the unbeliever having one. Concerning the believer's new nature ("new man"), I see it is how we are "partakers of the divine nature," which is Christ's nature because the implanted new nature in those reborn is created after His nature or "image" (Col 3:10).

But being partakers does not design the intention of possessing divinity itself in the believer but merely "partakers" of it, e.g. recipients of what it provides, which is chiefly that of permanent desire (nature) for God's pleasure, which is always Christ's chief desire (Jhn 5:30). This is the same for being recipients of the present and "everlasting covenant" (Heb 13:20) that is between the Son and the Father, meaning They are the only One's under the New Covenant, and man is the recipient of it.

Hope I didn't get too carried away here. Just attempting to share my opinion as open as possible.

Together Forever
NC
Do you see omnipresent and omniscient as being a part of God's divine nature?
Just asking because Jesus the man, was neither one.
 
17 And someone from the crowd answered him, “Teacher, I brought my son to you, for he has a spirit that makes him mute. 18 And whenever it seizes him, it throws him down, and he foams and grinds his teeth and becomes rigid. So I asked your disciples to cast it out, and they were not able.” 19 And he answered them, “O faithless generation, how long am I to be with you? How long am I to bear with you?
And what do you think that means to us?
 

Donations

Total amount
$1,592.00
Goal
$5,080.00
Back
Top