[__ Science __ ] Academic Editorial: Research Contradicting the LGBT Agenda Shouldn’t be Printed

[AIG.com]

The journal Nature Human Behavior recently published an editorial titled, “Science must respect the dignity and rights of all humans.”

Continue reading...

 

[Milk-Drops]

The journal Nature Human Behavior recently published an editorial titled, “Science must respect the dignity and rights of all humans.”

Continue reading...

Looks like projection. Respecting human rights doesn't mean publishing information that is controversial. Also, consider that this "agenda" means whatever it needs to fit whatever gripe, how do you think journals work or are for?

 

[Barbarian]

The journal Nature Human Behavior recently published an editorial titled, “Science must respect the dignity and rights of all humans.”

I can see why Ken Ham would be outraged by the very idea.

 

[Vaccine]

LOL
I guess people on the right don't take time to actually think about the absurdity of the narratives they push.

"...editors may raise with the authors concerns regarding potentially sexist, misogynistic, and/or anti-LGBTQ+ assumptions, implications or speech in their submission; engage external ethics experts to provide input on such issues as part of the peer review process; or request modifications to (or correct or otherwise amend post-publication), and in severe cases refuse publication of (or retract post-publication) sexist, misogynistic, and/or anti-LGBTQ+ content, using the guiding criteria I–IV in the section Research on human populations"

Sounds reasonable enough to me.