Covid 19 virus plus vaccine was meant to kill us.

[follower]

The most angry and furious person I seen during lockdown and jab rollout was a popup jab tent and i will say they allegedly offered his children the jab in exchange for a 50 buck voucher and they must have told him, he was flipping out full animal, it was like nearly to the point someone needed to call the cops, he was just being a protective Father. I think he was really angry that some adults were offering a reward to his kids in exchange they put something inside there body when he wasnt watching and he found out.

Only 50, to poison a child for however long they lived ?
Meanwhile, it was rumored or published, politicians paid $5,000 to $50,000 to GET a jab of saline solution or something else sterile. ....... big difference between public and private knowledge.

 

[Corn Pop]

If anyone thought pressuring me, or tempting me with fried chicken and donuts, or even forcing me to stay home as a second class citizen yet if i do what they want me to do they will allow me back in society and can go to venues and have a good time was going to somehow get me to fold or convince me, they were wrong.

 

[RedPill]

Ya gotta laugh at a "Reuters fact check."

Pfizer & Media Caught Lying About Graphene Oxide: Dr. Ana Mihalcea Proves Fact Checkers Are LIARS

Cancer and death rates across the world have skyrocketed. Dr. Ana Mihalcea is back with Stew to detail the graphene oxide inside the clot shots and how the media fact checkers are liars. Graphene oxid

rumble.com

Yeah, it's all "pretty much imagination," for sure...

Maria Zeee & Dr. Ana Mihalcea: Graphene Confirmed In Dental Anaesthetics By University of Colorado

Dr. Ana Mihalcea joins Maria Zeee to expose the breaking news that graphene has been confirmed in dental anaesthetics by the University of Colorado. This originally aired on banned.video. View Dr. Ana

rumble.com

...except when the truthers are killed...

Dr Andrea Noack Died, Just Hours After Publishing What's Really in the Vaccines

On November 18, 2020, well-known German chemist and one of the EU’s top graphene experts, Dr Andreas Noack was arrested by an armed police unit in the middle of his YouTube livestream. On November 26th, 2021, just hours after publishing this latest video about graphene oxide and graphene...

www.bitchute.com

Pfizer admitted graphene coverup:

Pfizer Emails Confirm Graphene: Intentional Cover-up By Chief Scientist Revealed

We have some new leaked emails from Pfizer. Ever since the vaccines dropped a year ago, people have been speculating they may contain graphene oxide as an explanation for mysterious side effects that

rumble.com

Free posted:

Professor Pablo Campra's own university denied the findings:

How about translating that X post into English for us.

 

[Corn Pop]

 

[Corn Pop]

It was all a set up from the start to condition people as lockdown was just an excuse to push a jab when it come out on the entire population, not those who were most at risk and vulnerable.

The many statements that state leaders made they hardly ever talked about any science, they were saying its all about boosting jab rates, even saying if you want your freedom back then get jabed, or, if everyone wants Christmas comming up in a couple months and holdiays then general popularion needs to get the quota first, or those who did not get jabed they had to stay home but those who were jabed were allowed back out as a "reward". Not a joke, in one state they acturally called giving people there civil rights back a "reward". I think it was even called the road to freedom. As far as I was aware freedom is a right not a reward.

They locked people down and took away many of there everyday basic civil rights and then said if people get jabbed they can have there rights back.

 

[Free]

It was all a set up from the start to condition people as lockdown was just an excuse to push a jab when it come out on the entire population, not those who were most at risk and vulnerable.

Where is your evidence that "it was all a set up from the start to condition people"? This is the problem with conspiracy theories and why Christians should have nothing to do with them--they're based largely or entirely on speculation. That is not the way of truth.

The many statements that state leaders made they hardly ever talked about any science, they were saying its all about boosting jab rates, even saying if you want your freedom back then get jabed, or, if everyone wants Christmas comming up in a couple months and holdiays then general popularion needs to get the quota first, or those who did not get jabed they had to stay home but those who were jabed were allowed back out as a "reward". Not a joke, in one state they acturally called giving people there civil rights back a "reward". I think it was even called the road to freedom. As far as I was aware freedom is a right not a reward.

They locked people down and took away many of there everyday basic civil rights and then said if people get jabbed they can have there rights back.

That was the right thing to do. A certain percentage of the population needed to get vaccinated in order to reduce the spread and bring things under control. As I have pointed out before, it is a clash of rights, not just the rights of those who refused to get vaccinated. In the end, the rights that won are the ones that should have won.

 

[Barbarian]

"I saw it on Rumble! It has to be true!"

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Rumble Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of right-wing propaganda and conspiracy theories and false information, use of poor sources, and a lack of transparency.

Rumble - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Rumble appears to be a right-wing conspiracy-buff echo chamber.

 

[KV-44-v1]

"I saw it on Rumble! It has to be true!"

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Rumble Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of right-wing propaganda and conspiracy theories and false information, use of poor sources, and a lack of transparency.

Rumble - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Rumble appears to be a right-wing conspiracy-buff echo chamber.

Okay, and I rate "Mediabiasfactcheck" Left Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of left-wing propaganda and conspiracy theories and false information, use of poor sources, and a lack of transparency.

It is well known that the top fact checkers are LEft Wing tools. Whats next, ivermectin is just horse paste and is useless for all else? Lol

 

[Barbarian]

Okay, and I rate "Mediabiasfactcheck" Left Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of left-wing propaganda and conspiracy theories and false information, use of poor sources, and a lack of transparency.

Comes down to credibility. They have it.

It is well known that the top fact checkers are LEft Wing tools.

"Those evil left-wingers are resorting to facts, again!"
Yes, we hear that a lot.

 

[KV-44-v1]

Yes, we hear that a lot.

"Those evil Right-wingers are resorting to facts, again!"
Yes, we hear , from every side. examples: Lamestream media and their various orgs, NGO's, associations, and more.

 

[RedPill]

lol they can't refute the research so they attack the messenger. There is no new thing under the sun.

 

[Free]

Ya gotta laugh at a "Reuters fact check."

Pfizer & Media Caught Lying About Graphene Oxide: Dr. Ana Mihalcea Proves Fact Checkers Are LIARS

Cancer and death rates across the world have skyrocketed. Dr. Ana Mihalcea is back with Stew to detail the graphene oxide inside the clot shots and how the media fact checkers are liars. Graphene oxid

rumble.com

Yeah, it's all "pretty much imagination," for sure...

Maria Zeee & Dr. Ana Mihalcea: Graphene Confirmed In Dental Anaesthetics By University of Colorado

Dr. Ana Mihalcea joins Maria Zeee to expose the breaking news that graphene has been confirmed in dental anaesthetics by the University of Colorado. This originally aired on banned.video. View Dr. Ana

rumble.com

...except when the truthers are killed...

Dr Andrea Noack Died, Just Hours After Publishing What's Really in the Vaccines

On November 18, 2020, well-known German chemist and one of the EU’s top graphene experts, Dr Andreas Noack was arrested by an armed police unit in the middle of his YouTube livestream. On November 26th, 2021, just hours after publishing this latest video about graphene oxide and graphene...

www.bitchute.com

Pfizer admitted graphene coverup:

Pfizer Emails Confirm Graphene: Intentional Cover-up By Chief Scientist Revealed

We have some new leaked emails from Pfizer. Ever since the vaccines dropped a year ago, people have been speculating they may contain graphene oxide as an explanation for mysterious side effects that

rumble.com

Free posted:

The irony that you 'gotta laugh at a "Reuters fact check",' but then go on to use Rumble and Bitchute as your sources. If you want disinformation and misinformation to support a conspiracy theory, Rumble is the place to go.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucel...he-latest-unsupported-claims/?sh=38e1f8e374d7

How about translating that X post into English for us.

Sure.

The title: "Statement from the University of Almería in relation to false information spread on some social networks and blogs."

The body:

"University of Almeria Statement

In response to false information spread on some social media and blogs about a provisional report by a professor at the University of Almeria, which appears to question Covid-19 vaccines, the University of Almeria reports that:

It is absolutely false that the University of Almeria has carried out a scientific study with the results being published by these media, which are distorting the content of an unofficial report by a University professor on an analysis of a sample of unknown origin with a complete lack of traceability. This report is neither endorsed nor shared by this university, as the report itself warns.

The University of Almeria, as an academic institution, fully supports vaccines as a scientifically unquestionable instrument to fight diseases.

The University of Almeria is considering and reserves the right to take civil and criminal action against those who continue to spread the falsehoods that this statement denies."

You could have easily done this yourself and saved me from typing it out.

lol they can't refute the research so they attack the messenger. There is no new thing under the sun.

Ya gotta laugh at a "Reuters fact check."

Yes, we hear , from every side. examples: Lamestream media and their various orgs, NGO's, associations, and more.

No, there is nothing new under the sun, even from you or KV, but of course you won't call your own out on it.

 

[Barbarian]

"Those evil Right-wingers are resorting to facts, again!"
Yes, we hear , from every side. examples: Lamestream media and their various orgs, NGO's, associations, and more.

"They are lying! All those doctors, scientists, and media are lying! I saw it on Rumble! It has to be true!"

Sure. You're their prey only as long as you keep buying their stories.

 

[Corn Pop]

That was the right thing to do. A certain percentage of the population needed to get vaccinated in order to reduce the spread and bring things under control. As I have pointed out before, it is a clash of rights, not just the rights of those who refused to get vaccinated. In the end, the rights that won are the ones that should have won.

They said the jab worked and was effective and those who got it they would not get very sick as it protects people and keeps them safe.

Yet suddenly if someone was not jabed those who were somehow did not want to be around them and felt unsafe, well according to some leaders generalisations and assumptions that created division and 2 classes of people.

How a jab can make someone safe and protect them from covid yet they somehow still afraid of others, and who are also most probably not even sick.

They obviously had no faith and belief in the jab if they made a rule only the jab got the right to go out and enjoy a meal and everyone else had to stay home. The rule was not made to protect the unjabed.

 

[RedPill]

Free posted:

The title: "Statement from the University of Almería in relation to false information spread on some social networks and blogs."

The body:

"University of Almeria Statement

In response to false information spread on some social media and blogs about a provisional report by a professor at the University of Almeria, which appears to question Covid-19 vaccines, the University of Almeria reports that:

It is absolutely false that the University of Almeria has carried out a scientific study with the results being published by these media, which are distorting the content of an unofficial report by a University professor on an analysis of a sample of unknown origin with a complete lack of traceability. This report is neither endorsed nor shared by this university, as the report itself warns.

The University of Almeria, as an academic institution, fully supports vaccines as a scientifically unquestionable instrument to fight diseases.

The University of Almeria is considering and reserves the right to take civil and criminal action against those who continue to spread the falsehoods that this statement denies."

Again, this has nothing to do with the man's research, the PhD who did the research. His research is not what is being questioned here, as anyone reading it can clearly see; and it doesn't require the university's validation. Neither you nor anyone else can dismiss it - hard as they may try. The "University of Almeria" disclaimer is the expected attempt to cover themselve$ - the typical non sequitur.

Free posted:

You could have easily done this yourself and saved me from typing it out.

Rather, this is an English-speaking site. The readership here shouldn't have to ask you to translate your replies.

To avoid derailing guyver's OP, we'll go back and address it directly:

Covid 19 virus plus vaccine was meant to kill us.​

Absolutely. Pfizer itself knew from the outset that it was a killer vaccine.

Pfizer was fully aware that the mRNA vaccine that it is marketing worldwide would result in a wave of mortality and morbidity. This is a crime against humanity on the part of Big Pharma.

You can read Pfizer's Confidential Report here,

or read a summary of the situation here.

"The confidential report is a bombshell. The vaccine was launched in mid-December 2020. By the end of February 2021, “Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.”

This Confidential Pfizer Report provides data on deaths and adverse events recorded by Pfizer from the outset of the vaccine project in December 2020 to the end of February 2021, namely a very short period (at most two and a half months).

The data from mid-December 2020 to the end of February 2021 unequivocally confirms “manslaughter”. Based on the evidence, Pfizer had the responsibility to immediately cancel and withdraw the “vaccine”.

Pfizer’s worldwide marketing of the Covid-19 Vaccine beyond February 28th, 2021 is no longer an “Act of Manslaughter”.

Murder as opposed to manslaughter implies “criminal intent”.

Pfizer’s Covid-19 Vaccine constitutes a criminal act. From a legal standpoint it is an “Act of Murder” applied worldwide to a target population of 8 billion people. Sofar more than 60 percent of the world’s population have been Covid-19 vaccinated."

The thesis of the OP has been tried and found worthy.

BTW, conspiracy is a biblical word, appearing 32 times.

 

[Barbarian]

Covid 19 virus plus vaccine was meant to kill us.

Considering that (in the U.S. alone) the death rate to COVID-19 was over a dozen times greater for the unvaccinated than the death rate for vaccinated people, we would be forced to conclude the people who prepared the vaccine to kill us, failed spectacularly.

The report you linked indicates that about 111,000 adverse events were associated with the vaccine. It says 1223 were "fatal." Keep in mind, these were not necessarily verified consequences of the vaccine; they just happened within a certain amount of time after the vaccine was given.

In the United States alone, over 367,000,000 vaccinations were given. So less than one person in 300,000 died after receiving the vaccine. To put it into perspective, about one person in 350 died in the pandemic.

Again, if the vaccine was designed to kill, it failed spectacularly. In fact, it backfired, saving millions.

 

[Milk-Drops]

They said the jab worked and was effective and those who got it they would not get very sick as it protects people and keeps them safe.

Dan can you source specificly what you are talking about? You are doing what a lot of people do when talking about a complex topic and just boiling down multiple claims made by multiple people at different times and contexts into a nebulous they. Lets take it slow, who said what?

Yet suddenly if someone was not jabed those who were somehow did not want to be around them and felt unsafe, well according to some leaders generalisations and assumptions that created division and 2 classes of people.

Do you have examples?

How a jab can make someone safe and protect them from covid yet they somehow still afraid of others, and who are also most probably not even sick.
They obviously had no faith and belief in the jab if they made a rule only the jab got the right to go out and enjoy a meal and everyone else had to stay home. The rule was not made to protect the unjabed.

Made up people can say whatever you want them to.

 

[Corn Pop]

Dan can you source specificly what you are talking about? You are doing what a lot of people do when talking about a complex topic and just boiling down multiple claims made by multiple people at different times and contexts into a nebulous they. Lets take it slow, who said what?

Your asking me for sources about if the jab was called safe and effective and could help people get less sick and protect them from covid. Are you serious?

 

[Milk-Drops]

Your asking me for sources about if the jab was called safe and effective and could help people get less sick and protect them from covid. Are you serious?

Yes, because you are mashing a bunch of different quotes together. I'm asking you to source your quotes so we can keep this grounded in reality, instead of a strawman.

 

[Milk-Drops]

Free posted:

DETECTION OF GRAPHENE IN COVID19 VACCINES BY MICRO-RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY

Or, European Parliament:

Parliamentary question | Time for the truth on the presence of graphene in the COVID-19 vaccines | P-000303/2022 | European Parliament

Priority question for written answer P-000303/2022 to the Commission Rule 138 Sergio Berlato (ECR)

www.europarl.europa.eu

Or, ResearchGate: Scanning and Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines

Or, watch a vid: Dr. Andreas Noack

Free posted:

He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him. (Pro. 18:13)

Looks like the report makes the claim that there is possible trace amounts of graphene oxide in the vaccines by one company, but has not shown to be dangerous. Considering Graphene proper is used in other medications. It seems this has more to do with the vaccines supposedly being linked with microchipping, but there doesn't seem to be enough graphene, a chip, or a power source to do anything. Chips, even very small ones still need a power source to run, or need to contact a powered reader.