I have always held the view presented by Jethro Bodine so well in his clear and excellent posts 2, 5, 8, and 13.
Here is my take on it, which is essentially Jethro's position, with perhaps a few additional tidbits:
The "blasphemy against the Holy Spirit", aka the "Unpardonable Sin", is mentioned in Mark 3:22-30 and Matthew 12:31-32
In my view, the context of the Mark 3:22-30 passage, quoted below, is the key to correctly interpreting the sin of "blasphemy against the Holy Spirit."
Here is the text of the Mark 3:22-32 passage:
22 And the teachers of the law who came down from Jerusalem said, “He is
possessed by Beelzebub! By the prince of demons he is driving out demons.”
23 So Jesus called them and spoke to them in parables: “How can Satan
drive out Satan?
24 If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom
cannot stand.
25 If a house is divided against itself, that house cannot
stand.
26 And if Satan opposes himself and is divided, he cannot stand;
his end has come.
27 In fact, no one can enter a strong man’s house and
carry off his possessions unless he first ties up the strong man. Then he can
rob his house.
28 I tell you the truth, all the sins and blasphemies of
men will be forgiven them.
29 But whoever blasphemes against the Holy
Spirit will never be forgiven; he is guilty of an eternal sin.”
30 He said this because they were saying, “He has an evil spirit
Mark 3:22-30
Here Are The Elements From the Mark 3:22-30 Passage:
- Jesus was driving out demons ...IE performing supernatural miracles which was proving that He was from God
- The teachers of the law saw these miracles
- Jesus said in the gospels that He performed miracles so that men could believe in Him (see John 10:25, 37-38 )
- These teachers of the law therefore should have believed in Him
- But they refused to believe in Him and that created a problem for them, namely how to explain the fact that Jesus could perform miracles
- So they came up with an alternative explanation, namely that Jesus was performing miracles by the power of Satan
- Jesus then made a very logical point, namely, Why would Satan oppose himself ? Answer: Satan would not oppose himself by casting out his own demons.
- It was in this context, with people doing what these teachers of the law were doing as noted above, that Jesus spoke of the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit
- Again, what were they doing? Answer: The were attributing Jesus' miracles (which could have helped them to believe) to the power of Satan
- Or put another way: They were in the process of continually rejecting the clear evidence that Jesus was who He said He was
- What would that mean? It would mean they could never be saved as long as they continued to do that...obviously it would mean that! (Thats why doing this is "unpardonable" IE there is only one cure for sin and that is to believe on the Lord Jesus as one's personal Savior)
- This is why Jesus ended this passage with the words: "He said this because they were saying, 'He has an evil spirit' " (IE because they were rejecting the evidence and attributing the source of the evidence to the power of evil
My Concluding Remarks:
* It is utterly impossible for any true Christian to commit the unpardonable sin because the true Christian has already believed in the Lord Jesus as Savior, and the unpardonable sin is the perpetual refusal to believe in Him as Savior.
* The Mark 3 and Matthew 12 passage must be interpreted in the light of all the rest of the entire context of the New Testament which is inharmonious with many of the popular interpretations of the so-called "unpardonable sin."
* The blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is not a sin that can be committed "one time" with no possible forgiveness thereafter, rather the sin MUST be on-going IE an unbeliever must CONTINUE to reject the evidence that could cause him to believe and be saved, by attributing that evidence to a source other than God
* Those unbelievers in Mark 3 and Matthew 12 could have STOPPED committing the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit if they had wanted to, they were not locked down in unbelief just because they had initially attributed the miracles performed by Jesus to the power of Satan, they could have changed their minds and believed in the Lord Jesus, had they wanted to do that
* The so-called "unpardonable sin" IE the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit
is nothing more and nothing less than to keep on continuously rejecting the evidence that Jesus is who He said He was by attributing that evidence to a source other than God. Why is that ? Because doing THAT means that the person that
keeps on doing it, can NEVER believe and be saved.
* Note that the Pharisees, in Matthew 9:34, said the same thing as the unbelievers said in Mark 3 and Matthew 12
"But the Pharisees said, 'It is by the prince of demons that He drives out demons'"
*
This is a very important verse to connect to what took place in Mark 3 and Matthew 12
John 10:25,37-38 (NIV) Jesus answered, "I did tell you, but you do not believe. The miracles I do in my Father's name speak for me... Do not believe me unless I do what my Father does. But if I do it, even though you do not believe me, believe the miracles, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father."
The teachers of the law in Mark 3:22-30 refused to do that, they thus committed the "unpardonable sin" of refusing to believe in the Lord Jesus as their Savior.
Anyway, thats my take on the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit aka the unpardonable sin.
♫♫
`