Recent content by dadof10

Off topic response to edited post. WIP

[Opinions must be supported by Scripture. WIP] Anyone, really. [Opinions must be supported by Scripture. WIP] [Opinions must be supported by Scripture. WIP] Peter answers your initial question. Yes, we do need to be dunked in water to be saved...

Then you believe that water baptism should be done to infants, as circumcision was? Correct, but neither are "outward signs" of salvation, as you stated. Circumcision is never tied to salvation as baptism is (1Pt 3:21). In fact, Paul tells us that circumcision has no bearing on salvation at...

Please show me where Scripture calls baptism "merely a symbol". I have been asking this question for years and have yet to get an actual verse. Please show me where Scripture calls baptism "an outward sign that you are saved". I have been asking this question for years and have yet to get an...

Dadof10: First of all, I said you haven't addressed Heb. 11:4-8. You have not said one, solitary word about these verses, and to to say you have addressed it "is a lie". You can shut me up and make me look like a complete fool, very easily. All you have to do is copy and paste your in depth...

First of all, I said you haven't addressed Heb. 11:4-8. You have addressed other verses in Hebrews 11, but have not said one solitary word about vs.4-8, which is what the OP is based upon. Secondly, calling someone a liar is personal...

So, you want me to "engage" on the verses you posted and I'm ignoring them...Hummm. Does this sound at all familiar? When you are ready to "engage" on Heb. 11:4-8, let me know. I posted the OP on Sept. 30 and, after repeated attempts, you still haven't mentioned one word on it. In case you've...

You have me confused with someone else. I don't "declare victory". You are still reluctant to actually address the OP. I can see why. Pretty airtight case.

We'll try, mom...:lol

Good point. Right on. Obedience is necessary for ongoing justification. stop obeying God, no more justification. The good news is, that we can repent and regain this justification.

I don't have to "undo" any argument about these verses. You have undone your own arguments over and over by repeatedly flip-flopping from "always perfectly justified, despite daily sin" to "lose justification unless daily sin is removed". I'm being charitable by letting you off the hook here...

I'm done discussing these verses. This particular tangent is not getting either one of us anywhere. I would like to point out one thing concerning "engaging", though. You have brought up "foot washing" verses, "lump/leaven" verses and other verses that you think bolster your case. In every...

They are right next to the verses that call it "merely symbolic" and "a show of faith"...:lol

Here it is again. I'll take it line by line: Referring to the "lump/leaven" metaphor you said: "So, despite their sin, which they are still in, their unleavened perfection still stands. He said so. Their sinning did not remove that so that they need to be re-justified." (italics in the...

You are now only quoting half of my thoughts? And I thought you only saved half-quotes for Scripture. I guess I'm in good company. Here is what I really said: "Jesus is saying that Peter, a believer, has to come to Jesus to have his daily sins removed, but does not need to be re-baptized...