Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Are you receiving an "error" mesage when posting?

    Chances are it went through, so check before douible posting.

    We hope to have the situtaion resolved soon, and Happy Thanksgiving to those in the US!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Ever read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • How are famous preachers sometimes effected by sin?

    Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject

    https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Search results

  1. M

    Books of the Bible

    Yes, the apostles were infallible and no one else was. This is the teaching of the NT. First, even the apostle Peter recognized what Paul wrote as scripture in 2nd Peter 3. 15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also, according to the...
  2. M

    Books of the Bible

    The Church is the pillar and foundation of the truth, but not the infallible judge of truth. The text does not need to say certain words for us to recognize the infallible authority stopped. The nature of apostleship was that they could infallibly remember the oral words of Christ. In Acts 1...
  3. M

    Books of the Bible

    * Francis, you begin with this statement..... "Paul never states that only his written words are infallible." --I already said that Paul gave both oral and written revelation in previous posts. When you say what you said in this statement, it makes me think your not grasping what I...
  4. M

    Books of the Bible

    Francis, I also discern scriptural inaccuracies in your statements above. Possibly its just the way your expressing yourself, or maybe we disagree here too. Scripture became scripture when it was first written. In 2nd Peter 3: 15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation...
  5. M

    Books of the Bible

    Francis, I notice your terms "oral or written." We have been through some of this before (albeit, a long time ago). I believe you quoted 2nd Thes 3:15 15 So then, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye were taught, whether by word, or by epistle of ours. That the oral teaching...
  6. M

    Books of the Bible

  7. M

    Books of the Bible

    Let me apologize in advance. This format is too short to really lay out an positive statement of my understanding of canon. I would need more space and need to use a lot of references. Please do not take this as a list of verses that I am using each individual verse to refute a position...
  8. M

    Books of the Bible

    Hello Francis, I can honestly say I am glad to see you. I would not say that the Corinthians accepted Pauls Epistles "in a vacuum. The recognized the apostolic authority of Paul to speak authoritatively to their congregation. The same would have occurred in any Apostolic letter. The 12...
  9. M

    Proof of Trinity

    Asyncritus, you have been repeatedly corrected on trinitarian doctrine and yet right after chessman corrects you, you again make the same identical mistake? It is not just chessman that corrected you in your misrepresentation of the trinity, I have too, and so have others. Yet you keep on...
  10. M

    How you are made free

    veryberry, good post. I do not disagree, but can I make some clarifications? I hope to add some stuff and get a little more specific about the nature of our freedom in Christ. I sincerely hope that it does not take away from your exellent OP in any way. You used two references from Romans 6...
  11. M

    Proof of Trinity

    Interesting. When I see words like "gigantic problem" and the extreme emotion you convey in your choice of words, it sound like I have a problem that is so painfully obvious to everyone, yet it is you that is throwing the verse out on the basis of the word "θεοτητος" (God head) being only used...
  12. M

    Proof of Trinity

    Asyncritus, I read the post you made. I am tempted to address it point by point and its many flaws, but your going all over the place in that post and getting quite passionate. It also takes too much space to reply. I wrote a reply but it exceeds the 10k character limit. So I am going to...
  13. M

    Proof of Trinity

    Asyncritus, your reply is not even beginning to scratch the surface of what Colossians 2:9 is all about. No trinitarian claims that the issue of the single word "Dwelleth" demonstrates the concept of the trinity. The concept of the absolute deity and equality with the Father in attributes is...
  14. M

    Proof of Trinity

  15. M

    Proof of Trinity

    I would agree that certain implications of the doctrine of the trinity and the encapsulation of deity within human flesh are not easy doctrines to understand because they have no parallel with creation. This does not mean I agree that no one can understand the doctrine of the trinity, or the...
  16. M

    Books of the Bible

    The lists of the books from Hippo, the Fathers, and Trent are all contradictory. But the point I was making had to do with your statement that Trent was the first list. Of course you now are mentioning some of the other councils and Fathers. The new article you are quoting does not even refer...
  17. M

    Books of the Bible

    No one came up with an approved list? Really? No Jerome, or Hippo? or many other Church Fathers? Similar dissension among protestants? Well, I do not know everything but whom are you talking about? Mormons against the Magisterial Reformers? I read the article you posted. Where does it say...
  18. M

    Proof of Trinity

    Slave of Jesus, you have spoken right. You noticed a key flaw in what Asyncritus is saying and he does grasp what you are saying. He called it a "meaningless and basically unscriptural theological construct." Asycritus does not grasp the difference between the role of function that Jesus had...
  19. M

    Proof of Trinity

    I fully agree. Its good to see Colossians quoted. It is a very important Epistle on the absolute and complete deity of Christ. So many will focus on statement in the Gospel of John, and I agree with those statements, but it is good to also to do as you did and include the statements from...
  20. M

    Admitting We Don't Know

    Not all "I do not knows" are equally valid. There are three different attitudes one can have in making a statement "I do not know." One of those attitudes is wrong and is a sinful attack on the authority of scriptures, the other two are just a fact of the nature of who we are as limited human...
Back
Top