Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

1+ 1 = 4

I thought I knew but maybe not... what is IRC?

And G. why are you quoting by boy Churchyard? He is one person I never thought I'd see in your signature.

I just think that Søren Kierkegaard is a good theistic existentialist. I am not as scientifically oriented as I appear sometimes on these forums. I like Søren's emphasis on subjectivity in Christianity. Too often I think Christians get tied down studying the Bible (like scientists get engulfed in mathematics), instead of praying/meditating. Christianity is a really mystical religion at its core, but we tend to forget that in modern life. I am not opposed to theism. I am merely a progressive, who does not care if a person gets those progressive beliefs from theism, deism or atheism. It is meaningless to me really.
 
10-4.

I like Churchyard a lot. He was a real good theologian and I would go so far as to say the Martin Luther of the 1800s. It's a shame the protestant churches didn't hear him very well, because many of them have regressed back to the tactics of the Catholic church. :shame

My only thing about Churchyard is that he knew the Bible inside and out, he studied it and was wicked smart. His dad raised him that way. I think he doesn't emphasis that there is an importance to study the Bible. But he was more about the church's problems then that, so I can forgive him. :thumbsup
 
David said God spake and it (the earth) stood fast. Job stated that God hung the earth on nothing. And we agree, huh?

And FAITH?? It is not known for sure until God puts it INSIDE OF YOU. (Heb. 6:1-5) And again, that takes total surrender for that FAITH to become a Fact. But that does not change pie R Square still being 22/7.

--Elijah

pard its icr.(instution of creation research)


the bible does have some scientific comments but its not wise to use the bible as something its not.

God doesnt save men through science but the actions of the cross.

and pie r squared is the formular for the area of a circle.
 
pard its icr.(instution of creation research)


the bible does have some scientific comments but its not wise to use the bible as something its not.

God doesnt save men through science but the actions of the cross.

and pie r squared is the formular for the area of a circle.

I can't be sure they are talking about the same thing, but I remember a yahoo answers question that accused the Bible of being wrong on the basis that a verse refers to a structure built in the Bible as "round" and the semantics of pi came into play. What an ignorant charge that was to extract pi out of the word "round". The Earth itself is not "round" in the exactness of pi.
 
I can't be sure they are talking about the same thing, but I remember a yahoo answers question that accused the Bible of being wrong on the basis that a verse refers to a structure built in the Bible as "round" and the semantics of pi came into play. What an ignorant charge that was to extract pi out of the word "round". The Earth itself is not "round" in the exactness of pi.

i know, pi isnt in the bible, i was correcting the elijah on what that formula was.

no the earth isnt a perfect sphere at all, the moon is egg shaped.
 
i know, pi isnt in the bible, i was correcting the elijah on what that formula was.

no the earth isnt a perfect sphere at all, the moon is egg shaped.

Yeah, I was just making sure that's not what was being discussed. I remember hearing that argument one time from an atheist and all I could think was "wow..."
 
pard its icr.(instution of creation research)


the bible does have some scientific comments but its not wise to use the bible as something its not.

God doesnt save men through science but the actions of the cross.

and pie r squared is the formular for the area of a circle.

;) And where was that found when these 'birds' were still calling the earth flat?? Isa. 40:22 + these ones that are discribed as educated??

'It is He that setteth upon the [CIRCLE] of the Earth, and the [Inhabit'ants'] thereof [ARE AS GRASSHOPPERS]..':readbible

--Elijah

PS: And the Actions of the cross? This is the Eternal Gospel of Rev. 14:6.
 
;) And where was that found when these 'birds' were still calling the earth flat?? Isa. 40:22 + these ones that are discribed a educated??

'It is He that setteth upon the [CIRCLE] of the Earth, and the [Inhabit'ants'] thereof [ARE AS GRASSHOPPERS]..':readbible

--Elijah

PS: And the Actions of the cross? This is the Eternal Gospel of Rev. 14:6.

look the bible isnt a science book and it wasnt meant to be.

if you say it is then why did the greeks (though not the the only)discover pi??

and where are these stated in the bible?

speed of sound
human anatomy with all parts listed.
atomic theory
law of thermo dynamics
law of gravity and how it works.
theory of electromagneticism?
hole theory
cell theory
germ theory

the death of the cross =equals the actions of the cross.

when i look at the synthentic cell and i want to know what it is , i'm sorry but genesis isnt where i read up on it.
 
;) And where was that found when these 'birds' were still calling the earth flat?? Isa. 40:22 + these ones that are discribed as educated??

'It is He that setteth upon the [CIRCLE] of the Earth, and the [Inhabit'ants'] thereof [ARE AS GRASSHOPPERS]..':readbible

--Elijah

PS: And the Actions of the cross? This is the Eternal Gospel of Rev. 14:6.

PS/PS:
Yeah, 'i' can see that we are aeons apart! 1 Cor. 3:19

Jer. 17
[5] Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.
 
so you using a scientific invention is sin???

i am not saying that creationism is false here just that we shouldnt say the bible says what it doesnt say.
 
Back
Top