C
cupid dave
Guest
1Tim 6:20 and Acts 17:11 (as well as the Two Greatest Commands) form the basis of the Scriptural guidance
The two verses together, in 32AD, condemn science as a means to the Truth and recommends that people search the scriptures.
This seems good advice for that Pre-Modern Scientific Method era.
And, the search of Scripture according to Theistic Evoution still supports the search of the scriptures in order to see the Truth.
Can we, in this Modern Age of Empirical Science, assume that St Paul was referring to Modern Science as well as the Astrologically based supposed sciences of his day?
In 1Tim 6:20, St Paul writes the warning against that ancient pseudo-science that was full of magicians and soothsayers, and based upon the mere opinions and arguments set forth by Aristotle and Plato.
Was it not the historically the fact that the RCC split because that RCC did not listen to iTi 6:20? They continued to place faith in Ptolemy, insisted that the church assumption they stamped with their authority onto the pages of Genesis somehow said God told them, the Sun rotates around the earth.
What seem to have happened is that men in the 17th Century developed ways to find the Truth, the essence of the Christ, and ascertain without doubt that certain things were True, regardless of what the arguments and prestige of Plato wroth upon that Truth.
The larger question for Denominational Protestant Christians is whether they remember their own roots, and how they fault the "knowledge" of the church leaders, because this Scientific Method demonstrated that it was the RCC leaders who lied as the devils will, not father Copernicus, not Newton, Galileo, and Kepler, et al.
And, those men use this method of Modern Science which allowed any man to double check the Truth they boast of, merely by peering into the teleoscope for themselves.
1Tim 6:20 and Acts 17:11 (as well as the Two Greatest Commands) form the basis of the Scriptural guidance
The two verses together, in 32AD, condemn science as a means to the Truth and recommends that people search the scriptures.
This seems good advice for that Pre-Modern Scientific Method era.
And, the search of Scripture according to Theistic Evoution still supports the search of the scriptures in order to see the Truth.
Can we, in this Modern Age of Empirical Science, assume that St Paul was referring to Modern Science as well as the Astrologically based supposed sciences of his day?
In 1Tim 6:20, St Paul writes the warning against that ancient pseudo-science that was full of magicians and soothsayers, and based upon the mere opinions and arguments set forth by Aristotle and Plato.
Was it not the historically the fact that the RCC split because that RCC did not listen to iTi 6:20? They continued to place faith in Ptolemy, insisted that the church assumption they stamped with their authority onto the pages of Genesis somehow said God told them, the Sun rotates around the earth.
What seem to have happened is that men in the 17th Century developed ways to find the Truth, the essence of the Christ, and ascertain without doubt that certain things were True, regardless of what the arguments and prestige of Plato wroth upon that Truth.
The larger question for Denominational Protestant Christians is whether they remember their own roots, and how they fault the "knowledge" of the church leaders, because this Scientific Method demonstrated that it was the RCC leaders who lied as the devils will, not father Copernicus, not Newton, Galileo, and Kepler, et al.
And, those men use this method of Modern Science which allowed any man to double check the Truth they boast of, merely by peering into the teleoscope for themselves.
1Tim 6:20 and Acts 17:11 (as well as the Two Greatest Commands) form the basis of the Scriptural guidance