Truthfrees
Member
this is very interesting - i didn't know this was possible
water of 2 oceans won't mix and you can see where they meet
water of 2 oceans won't mix and you can see where they meet
Christian Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
-
Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
[__ Science __ ] 2 oceans won't mix
- Thread starter Truthfrees
- Start date
Truthfrees
Member
amazing thanks
they have about 10 seas and oceans in the video that won't mix - pretty amazing to see the science behind why
daninthelionsden
Member
Hopefully that means Fukushima turns only one ocean to wormwood and not all.
jasonc
Member
Please,read up,on,radiation levels ,its not even close to,that .
The fear of nukes power but adoration of solar and electric cars despite ,that neodymium leaves radiation in its creation in water is strange
daninthelionsden
Member
I do know the active practice of dumping the accumulated radioactive waste water cannot be good.
JohnDB
Member
They don't irradiate water and then dump it.
The water used inside of reactors is pure water with no dissolved minerals or salts... because pure water can't become radioactive...
Now this pure water can be used to heat other water...but it's not contaminated with radioactivity whatsoever...heat maybe...but nothing radioactive.
Now the only way that water becomes contaminated is if dissolved minerals or salts are in water exposed...as in pools containing spent fuel rods.
But these minerals are easily removed...just like drinking water is purified. Many ways to collect them.
So I have no idea what you are talking about with dumping radioactive water.
Where does this stuff accumulate?
How is is contaminated?
Even the sewage from drinking fountains is highly monitored at Nuke plants...it's ridiculous...every tree numbered and inventoried.
What you are saying isn't possible. About a thousand people would have to be bribed to keep quiet.
Which is why I won't work in a Nuke plant...too many people are needed to coordinate and inspect anything. I'll usually run @ 60' of pipe in @90 minutes in a normal environment. In a Nuke plant you had a great week if you ran that much. (You won't)
daninthelionsden
Member
www.independent.com
asiatimes
theguardian
snopes
All report tritium laced water being dumped because they've run out of space and the amount( something like 1 million+ tons) is unmanageable. Youtube has videos. Type it in anywhere. Easy to find.
jasonc
Member
That's a marker and its. Not harmful ,it used to see if there's a leak
jasonc
Member
Heavy water is toxic upon massive consumptions,the amount is large ,1.5 gallons ,aka deuterium .
I posted in another thread
daninthelionsden
Member
THAT is a relief!
Barbarian
Member
Actually, that's how a hydrogen bomb works. There's a tiny, tiny amount of radioactive hydrogen in water molecules which if collected, can be rather dangerous. But water can't "catch" radioactivity from radioactive elements, which is what you clearly meant.
JohnDB
Member
It's been years since I have had to know this stuff...but there was fusion and fission. Fusion is a "cleaner" explosion with a small radioactive core afterwards but huge burst of radioactivity (tac nukes)and fission is dirty everywhere.
This is what I found just from a cursory search:
www.forbes.com
www.theguardian.com
www.businessinsider.com
So, it's still controversial, and there are both positives and negatives about it. Can't see that anyone else is contaminating sea water with radioactive material, as Fukushima seems the only one in headlines.
Concerning oceans mixing, here is a map of ocean currents:
So, I can't see how oceans can't mix. They may be coming to false conclusions, since they don't even mention deep ocean currents, and it's easy to photoshop colors. They spend a lot of time on rivers that don't mix for awhile, but that doesn't support their conclusion about oceans IMO.
Anyone with discussion on how this plays out scientifically?
TD
It's Really OK If Japan Dumps Radioactive Fukushima Water Into The Ocean
Slowly releasing Fukushima tritium-contaminated water into the Pacific Ocean is a very good idea. No other radioactive elements are in the water and tritium just isn’t very radioactive - it self-dilutes in water really quickly, even in our bodies, making it impossible to harm anyone or anything.
www.forbes.com
Fukushima: Japan will have to dump radioactive water into Pacific, minister says
More than a million tonnes of contaminated water lies in storage but power company says it will run out of space by 2022
www.theguardian.com
Fukushima is running out of space to store contaminated water. Japan's environment minister said the 'only option' is to dump it in the ocean.
Dumping contaminated water into the ocean could damage Japan's local fishing economy. Contamination could also travel to South Korea's coast.
www.businessinsider.com
Concerning oceans mixing, here is a map of ocean currents:
So, I can't see how oceans can't mix. They may be coming to false conclusions, since they don't even mention deep ocean currents, and it's easy to photoshop colors. They spend a lot of time on rivers that don't mix for awhile, but that doesn't support their conclusion about oceans IMO.
Anyone with discussion on how this plays out scientifically?
TD
Last edited:
JohnDB
Member
He already did...look through past posts so you can catch up.This is what I found just from a cursory search:
It's Really OK If Japan Dumps Radioactive Fukushima Water Into The Ocean
Slowly releasing Fukushima tritium-contaminated water into the Pacific Ocean is a very good idea. No other radioactive elements are in the water and tritium just isn’t very radioactive - it self-dilutes in water really quickly, even in our bodies, making it impossible to harm anyone or anything.Fukushima: Japan will have to dump radioactive water into Pacific, minister says
More than a million tonnes of contaminated water lies in storage but power company says it will run out of space by 2022So, it's still controversial, and there are both positives and negatives about it. Can't see that anyone else is contaminating sea water with radioactive material, as Fukushima seems the only one in headlines.Fukushima is running out of space to store contaminated water. Japan's environment minister said the 'only option' is to dump it in the ocean.
Dumping contaminated water into the ocean could damage Japan's local fishing economy. Contamination could also travel to South Korea's coast.
Concerning oceans mixing, here is a map of ocean currents:
So, I can't see how oceans can't mix. Where is that info coming from? Let's see the source.
TD
Ok, but I didn't see any of these pertinent links in any of the posts. Anyway, this became a side issue, as the OP is addressing oceans mixing, and that's 1/2 of my post. Also, sorry you responded so fast and didn't get to see my edits.
TD