[_ Old Earth _] 300,000 year old fossils of Homo Sapiens found

[Jim Parker]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/scientists-find-oldest-known-specimens-of-the-human-species-1496854801

Scientists Find Oldest Known Specimens of the Human Species
There you go YEC folk.
Enjoy.

 

[civilwarbuff]

Got a different link that does not require a subscription?

 

[Jim Parker]

Got a different link that does not require a subscription?

Found it on the Drudge Report.
Right hand column near bottom.

 

[jasonc]

For a minute a there I thought it was the vero man story

 

[Douglas Summers]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/scientists-find-oldest-known-specimens-of-the-human-species-1496854801

Scientists Find Oldest Known Specimens of the Human Species
There you go YEC folk.
Enjoy.

Jim, I myself do not believe the created world is that Old. maybe 10,000 years or less.

 

[Edward]

Jim, I myself do not believe the created world is that Old. maybe 10,000 years or less.

Yeah, it's gotta be something going on with it. The pressure from the flood waters created fossils and threw off the dating process somehow or, Satan's been planting false evidence for hundreds/thousands of years getting ready for a big deception or something. I mean, scripture says it's not that old...man's dating techniques say it is...? Somebody's lying somewhere. That's all there is to it. Has to be.

 

[jasonc]

Planting evidence?

People were dredging the main relief canal and dug through human graves and collected the parts and sold them here.sellers found this out after he was told by Kennedy and said this find was implying a far older human civilization was here.it's the vero man I'm talking about. This isn't the only human remains to be found and trashed for a few homes here.

 

[Barbarian]

Not everyone is convinced this is H. sapiens, rather than one of the numerous human species that did not lead to modern humans. But it's remarkably human in appearance, other than the brow ridges. Brow ridges are found in most archaic H. sapiens.

 

[Cygnus]

Yeah, it's gotta be something going on with it. The pressure from the flood waters created fossils and threw off the dating process somehow or, Satan's been planting false evidence for hundreds/thousands of years getting ready for a big deception or something. I mean, scripture says it's not that old...man's dating techniques say it is...? Somebody's lying somewhere. That's all there is to it. Has to be.

One thing we have to ask....is the amount of C14 today the same as it was 4,000 years ago? Most old earth scientist...follow uniformitarianism and think the world responded in the past the way it does today. They fail to realize just how much the flood up-set the earth.

 

[Edward]

One thing we have to ask....is the amount of C14 today the same as it was 4,000 years ago? Most old earth scientist...follow uniformitarianism and think the world responded in the past the way it does today. They fail to realize just how much the flood up-set the earth.

Yeah, Brother. And if 14C is decaying, will the earth eventually run out of it? Besides, supposedly 14C dating methods are really only accurate to thousands of years and not millions. So it's not like 14C dating is even reliable and accurate method of dating at all. I bet not even all scientists accept 14C dating as reliable and accurate. It's just enough scientific mumbo jumbo for them to be able to say, well you just don't understand it but it's the truth...it's not. It can't be.

 

[Cygnus]

Yeah, Brother. And if 14C is decaying, will the earth eventually run out of it? Besides, supposedly 14C dating methods are really only accurate to thousands of years and not millions. So it's not like 14C dating is even reliable and accurate method of dating at all. I bet not even all scientists accept 14C dating as reliable and accurate. It's just enough scientific mumbo jumbo for them to be able to say, well you just don't understand it but it's the truth...it's not. It can't be.

Will the earth run out of C14? I doubt it. C14 is made when cosmic radiation strikes nitrogen in the upper atmosphere.

 

[Free]

Yeah, it's gotta be something going on with it. The pressure from the flood waters created fossils and threw off the dating process somehow or, Satan's been planting false evidence for hundreds/thousands of years getting ready for a big deception or something. I mean, scripture says it's not that old...man's dating techniques say it is...? Somebody's lying somewhere. That's all there is to it. Has to be.

Scripture says nothing about the age of the earth.

 

[Jim Parker]

Jim, I myself do not believe the created world is that Old. maybe 10,000 years or less.

OK
Based on what evidence?

 

[Barbarian]

Yeah, Brother. And if 14C is decaying, will the earth eventually run out of it?

No. New C-14 is being continuously made in the upper atmosphere, from cosmic rays striking nitrogen atoms.

Besides, supposedly 14C dating methods are really only accurate to thousands of years and not millions.

Which is one of the several reasons paleontologists don't use C-14 for fossils.

So it's not like 14C dating is even reliable and accurate method of dating at all. I bet not even all scientists accept 14C dating as reliable and accurate. It's just enough scientific mumbo jumbo for them to be able to say, well you just don't understand it but it's the truth...it's not. It can't be.

If you'd like to learn more about the processes actually used, we can talk about it.

 

[Edward]

Will the earth run out of C14? I doubt it. C14 is made when cosmic radiation strikes nitrogen in the upper atmosphere.

That figures, there's a way for everything to be replenished.

Scripture says nothing about the age of the earth.

You're right, directly speaking. It does list events and times and genealogies though so it is possible to get in the ball park I think. There was creation, then about 2000 years, then the flood, then another 2000 or so years until Jesus came. We're now at slightly more than 2000 years since Jesus's generation so we have completed 6 days (on the heavenly calendar), so that makes us early in the morning on the 7th day since creation, or early in the morning of the 3rd day, from Jesus's resurrection! Both days speak prophetically. This is going to be an exciting day.

If you'd like to learn more about the processes actually used, we can talk about it.

I'm not sure what good it would do. I believe what I believe and the way I figure it, a cursory understanding of what man "thinks" is all that's really needed. We know that man's intelligence is foolishness to God, so man can be expected to be wrong. Even aside from the group that seeks deliberate deception upon the people. So a cursory look at what man's saying is all one needs to be able to see where it departs from scripture, and to see whether or not is is a unanimous agreement among scientists. (which it does not have, they're all over the place in theories). I notice they don't seem to be arguing about...gravity for instance. But the age of the earth? Take your pick; 6K yrs, 4.5 billion, 12 billion, 13 billion...they have no clue, except for scripture, and scrolls they dig up. But it's not the dating of the scrolls, it's the words.

 

[Cygnus]

You're right, directly speaking. It does list events and times and genealogies though so it is possible to get in the ball park I think.

I think the biblical age has been established well within the ballpark. The linages presented in the Bible can easily be added up.
But, this doesn't work for the Theo-evo sect has to change Genesis into a false Genesis. The linage is presented again in the Gospels of the NT. Goes right back to Adam. The Theo-Evo sect has to deny that linage. Their mixture of OE science and bible demands it. They say science has disproven Genesis...they make t a myth....based upon their interpretation of rocks. They stand on the wrong rock.
Whats next? More than likely the denial of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. They've already excused the fall in the garden...original sin...and how man got his sin nature. So, the resurrection is next. Everybody knows science says if your dead you stay dead on day 3. Funny how the Theo-Evos cling to the resurrection of Christ Jesus....BUT...turn around and dismiss Christ Jesus (The Words) six day creation of the universe as presented in the same bible that speaks f the resurrection.

 

[Barbarian]

You're right, directly speaking. It does list events and times and genealogies though so it is possible to get in the ball park I think. There was creation, then about 2000 years, then the flood, then another 2000 or so years until Jesus came. We're now at slightly more than 2000 years since Jesus's generation so we have completed 6 days (on the heavenly calendar), so that makes us early in the morning on the 7th day since creation, or early in the morning of the 3rd day, from Jesus's resurrection! Both days speak prophetically. This is going to be an exciting day.

First, there are human-built structures older than your chronology, which involves making a good number of assumptions rather than secure dates.

Even more important, there is no time given between the beginning when God first made Heaven and Earth, and when he created light before Adam. It could have been any amount of time, as Spurgeon wrote.

 

[Edward]

First, there are human-built structures older than your chronology, which involves making a good number of assumptions rather than secure dates.

Even more important, there is no time given between the beginning when God first made Heaven and Earth, and when he created light before Adam. It could have been any amount of time, as Spurgeon wrote.

I thought it says and the evening and the morning were the first second third day and so forth. Indicating to us that they were 24 hour days, like we know it.

 

[Barbarian]

I thought it says and the evening and the morning were the first second third day and so forth. Indicating to us that they were 24 hour days, like we know it.

No indication how much time elapsed between the beginning, and that point. and of course, the indication is that the "days" (actually a word meaning among other things "always" "forever" "in my time" and so on) were not literal 24-hour days.

 

[Free]

I thought it says and the evening and the morning were the first second third day and so forth. Indicating to us that they were 24 hour days, like we know it.

The point is that it appears the first day doesn't start until Gen. 1:3.