It is the word I meant, and I was trying to address the point that some people view a demonstration of false teachings, (for example the SDA church) to be an attack on everyone in that religion. Whenever I deal with with Mormons (another example) and the many gross and many illegal things that Joseph Smith did, many Mormons take that as a personal attack against them, and then respond with personal insults istead of data that would refute what others and people like me post.I don't think "attack" is the intended word here though.
Every cult or false religion fails to follow the proper Christology. The SDA church also fails here. There are some in the church who believe that Jesus Christ always IS God, come in the flesh. Uniformly they reject ALL of the Ecumenical Creeds, and in the process also reject the dual and eternal Natures of Jesus Christ (100% human and 100% God without any mixture or confusion of those natures)Who is Jesus Christ? Always stick with who he is.
Also some in the SDA church believes that Michael the Archangel is Jesus. So you are correct in that account.
That is why the best apologetic comes from a thorough knowledge of the Bible, and not from a basis of presuppositionals (van Til) or through evidences (McDowell, et al)Other religions view Him differently. One doesn't need to study another religion to witness the truth of who He is.
Respectfully, I disagree that this should be a universal approach. God gifts us uniquely, and mine lie in the areas of teaching, preaching and prophet. That does not mean that I am adverse to mercy or evangelism. I love to win people for Jesus Christ, and I feel good when I can act kindly to someone in the name of Jesus. But having gifts that center on the proclamation of propositional truth, I am "hard wired" to say that this or that does not agree with Scripture.Those differences will surface and yes, absolutely do not appear as one who's intent it is to prove someone else's belief is wrong.
Many Christians are either "Scripturally illiterate" or else blinded by smooth-talking charlatans who twist Scripture to make a false gospel that is another sort of gospel: that from demons. When that happens, I do not believe that is wrong to expose the truth in a gentle manner.
When Jude wrote in verse 3 I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints. (ESV)", He was not saying play pat-a-cake with the cultist. (neither are you, but it is good rhetoric) He was using a compound Greek verb in the command voice. The preposition eppi (English equivalent is epic) is attached to the verb "struggle" and you have a very strong command to struggle as if you were in an epic for the faith. that is the strongest exortation in the NT, but it is far from the only one.
Hopefully, you can see that while I do contend for the faith, it is my aim not to be contentious when I do that. Sometimes I do that, sometimes not. But always, I seek to tell people the truth. Sometimes they accept that it, other times not. I tell people the truth as nicely as I can because there are some like the author of the OP are already rejecting the things of the SDA church. Since the SDA church venerates Ellen (yes, that is the proper word) and they claim that she is a prophetess, would it be wrong to demonstrate false prophecies and medical quackery? The reason I do that is not to "hurt a dead woman" but to demonstrate that if someone in her movement applied the OT Scriptures to her for those false prophecies, she would have been stoned.Let them make that decision. Show them, tell them what Christ has done in your life, what Christ means to you but always try to stay with Christ... who He is. Talk about him, not the other person or their "wrong" theology.
My aim is to start a thought process that leaves to a person leaving the SDA church. for many legitimate reasons I believe that it is a cult. the thought process is "If Ellen should have been stoned for proved false prophecies, is there anything else that is not in keeping with Scripture in this church. I want them to look for themselves, but there must be that seed planted.
However, I do get the impression that you may be giving me a hint to not do as I have been doing on the SDA forum, and attempting to expose the many false things of the SDA church. But this is your house, so it is your rules. You tell me, please.