Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

A 3 Way Marriage

Lewis

Member
Unprecedented civil union unites Brazilian trio



Brazilian public notary Claudia do Nascimento Domingues set off a firestorm by granting Brazil's first civil union to a trio, an act so unprecedented that there isn't a word for it in Portuguese. Uniao poliafetiva is the label she created. "Polyfidelitous union" is her best guess in English.
The relationship involves three professionals in their 30s -- one man and two women -- who, she says, live together, love one another as equals and are like any other non-married cohabiting couple -- except they are three.


What Domingues did was legally register the trio as a "stable union," a civil union that extends all of the benefits of marriage, though there is debate about what rights the threesome will actually enjoy. It short, it recognizes the trio as a family entity for public legal purposes.
Domingues has not released the identities of the three.
But not all are embracing the unique alliance.
<cite class="expCaption">Will civil unions pass in Colorado?</cite>
<cite class="expCaption"></cite><cite class="expCaption">
Luter: Marriage is between man and woman</cite>
"This union is void of any legality," said Regina Beatriz Tavares da Silva, head of the family law committee of a lawyers' association in Sao Paulo.
Brazilian law defines marriage as a union between two people, so it is impossible for a civil union of three to be granted the rights of a marriage of two.


"It goes directly against the constitution," da Silva said. "Monogamy is defined as relations between two, not three or four or five."
The first-of-its-kind civil union has led to an outcry from religious groups, too. Those who fear the "slipperly slope" feel the ground moving underneath their feet.
"The institution of family cannot be defended with the approval of actions that seek to distort its definition," the religious, conservative Plinio Correa de Oliveira Institute said in a statement. "The purpose of this (union) is not to build families, but to destroy them."


The controversial civil union "is proof that there is a plurality of familiar relations, though not all deserve judicial or legal standing," Rolf Madaleno, director of the Brazilian Institute for Family Law, said in a statement. "The action carried out does not provide protections and does not confer rights."
In his opinion, the legal action in question does nothing more than reaffirm that the trio in question believes that they are a trio.
Domingues, 39, argues that they deserve some benefits. They live together in Rio de Janeiro, they share a bank account, and they want protection in case of separation or death, she said.


Brazil is known for its progressive social policies and openness, as reflected in the status conferred to the trio, though the country is stereotyped, too. While Brazil appears to be a permissive place, it is also a a country where more than 86% of the population identifies as Catholic or evangelical.
There was a similar outcry when "stable unions" between same-sex couples were allowed for the first time. The country's supreme court ruled that a gay couple in a civil union had the same rights as a married heterosexual couple, but there is debate about whether such rights can be extended to a trio.


But to Domingues, a public notary in the city of Tupa in Sao Paulo state, there is nothing preventing nontraditional relationships from being granted "stable union" status.
The trio considers themselves a family and is entitled to be seen as such in the public record, Domingues said.


"By registering them, I only confirmed that they recognize themselves as a family," she said. "I don't confer rights to them. That is up to a judge to decide."
The civil union was actually granted three months ago, but news of it only spread this week.
Da Silva called the civil union "deceitful," a runaround to grant status to a polygamous relationship.
Such relationships aren't new; they just haven't been recognized, Domingues said.


She says that she simply put her stamp of approval on a relationship that was surfing on a wave of cultural currents, but it was no coincidence that the request landed on her desk.
The trio from Rio, having been rejected by other public notaries, found their way rural Sao Paulo state and to Domingues because she is a student of polyfidelitous relationships -- ones involving more than two partners, but where there is fidelity between the members.


Formerly an IT manager, Domingues now is a doctoral student at the University of Sao Paulo, studying family law.
Her dissertation, she said, is about "how you can love more than one person at the same time." Her research looks at cultures, places, sociology, anthropology, religion and the history of family and intimate relationships in Brazil.
Through mutual friends, the trio found Domingues and traveled more than 600 miles from Rio, into the interior of Sao Paulo state, to Tupa.


Domingues doesn't hesitate to call herself married, though she and her husband are bound by a "stable union" and not a civil marriage. Her husband works with her as a deputy public notary.
"We have had all the reactions you can imagine," she said.
Other polyfidelitous groups have reached out to her seeking the same civil union status.
Domingues is studying the cases of a quintet (two men and three women) and another trio (one woman and two men).
 
Unprecedented civil union unites Brazilian trio



Brazilian public notary Claudia do Nascimento Domingues set off a firestorm by granting Brazil's first civil union to a trio, an act so unprecedented that there isn't a word for it in Portuguese. Uniao poliafetiva is the label she created. "Polyfidelitous union" is her best guess in English.
The relationship involves three professionals in their 30s -- one man and two women -- who, she says, live together, love one another as equals and are like any other non-married cohabiting couple -- except they are three.


What Domingues did was legally register the trio as a "stable union," a civil union that extends all of the benefits of marriage, though there is debate about what rights the threesome will actually enjoy. It short, it recognizes the trio as a family entity for public legal purposes.
Domingues has not released the identities of the three.
But not all are embracing the unique alliance.
<cite class="expCaption">Will civil unions pass in Colorado?</cite>
<cite class="expCaption"></cite><cite class="expCaption">
Luter: Marriage is between man and woman</cite>
"This union is void of any legality," said Regina Beatriz Tavares da Silva, head of the family law committee of a lawyers' association in Sao Paulo.
Brazilian law defines marriage as a union between two people, so it is impossible for a civil union of three to be granted the rights of a marriage of two.


"It goes directly against the constitution," da Silva said. "Monogamy is defined as relations between two, not three or four or five."
The first-of-its-kind civil union has led to an outcry from religious groups, too. Those who fear the "slipperly slope" feel the ground moving underneath their feet.
"The institution of family cannot be defended with the approval of actions that seek to distort its definition," the religious, conservative Plinio Correa de Oliveira Institute said in a statement. "The purpose of this (union) is not to build families, but to destroy them."


The controversial civil union "is proof that there is a plurality of familiar relations, though not all deserve judicial or legal standing," Rolf Madaleno, director of the Brazilian Institute for Family Law, said in a statement. "The action carried out does not provide protections and does not confer rights."
In his opinion, the legal action in question does nothing more than reaffirm that the trio in question believes that they are a trio.
Domingues, 39, argues that they deserve some benefits. They live together in Rio de Janeiro, they share a bank account, and they want protection in case of separation or death, she said.


Brazil is known for its progressive social policies and openness, as reflected in the status conferred to the trio, though the country is stereotyped, too. While Brazil appears to be a permissive place, it is also a a country where more than 86% of the population identifies as Catholic or evangelical.
There was a similar outcry when "stable unions" between same-sex couples were allowed for the first time. The country's supreme court ruled that a gay couple in a civil union had the same rights as a married heterosexual couple, but there is debate about whether such rights can be extended to a trio.


But to Domingues, a public notary in the city of Tupa in Sao Paulo state, there is nothing preventing nontraditional relationships from being granted "stable union" status.
The trio considers themselves a family and is entitled to be seen as such in the public record, Domingues said.


"By registering them, I only confirmed that they recognize themselves as a family," she said. "I don't confer rights to them. That is up to a judge to decide."
The civil union was actually granted three months ago, but news of it only spread this week.
Da Silva called the civil union "deceitful," a runaround to grant status to a polygamous relationship.
Such relationships aren't new; they just haven't been recognized, Domingues said.


She says that she simply put her stamp of approval on a relationship that was surfing on a wave of cultural currents, but it was no coincidence that the request landed on her desk.
The trio from Rio, having been rejected by other public notaries, found their way rural Sao Paulo state and to Domingues because she is a student of polyfidelitous relationships -- ones involving more than two partners, but where there is fidelity between the members.


Formerly an IT manager, Domingues now is a doctoral student at the University of Sao Paulo, studying family law.
Her dissertation, she said, is about "how you can love more than one person at the same time." Her research looks at cultures, places, sociology, anthropology, religion and the history of family and intimate relationships in Brazil.
Through mutual friends, the trio found Domingues and traveled more than 600 miles from Rio, into the interior of Sao Paulo state, to Tupa.


Domingues doesn't hesitate to call herself married, though she and her husband are bound by a "stable union" and not a civil marriage. Her husband works with her as a deputy public notary.
"We have had all the reactions you can imagine," she said.
Other polyfidelitous groups have reached out to her seeking the same civil union status.
Domingues is studying the cases of a quintet (two men and three women) and another trio (one woman and two men).

What will they think of next.:sad all I can say is Lord come soon.. what are children saying to this kind of thing...this is worse than pornography..obnoxious and evil. The same sex and now this. This is really making a mockery of the marriage institution.
 
And so it begins. When those of us who suggested that opening the door to gay marriage or "civil unions" would open the door to all sorts of oddball efforts to fit square pegs into the round hole of marriage, the LGBT activists pooh-poohed the prediction, claiming "no one will want to marry a pig, or create a man-child marriage" or any of a hundred other ungodly concepts of "marriage."

Sadly, they were wrong, we were right. Look to the east, the judgment is nigh.
 
And so it begins. When those of us who suggested that opening the door to gay marriage or "civil unions" would open the door to all sorts of oddball efforts to fit square pegs into the round hole of marriage, the LGBT activists pooh-poohed the prediction, claiming "no one will want to marry a pig, or create a man-child marriage" or any of a hundred other ungodly concepts of "marriage."

Sadly, they were wrong, we were right. Look to the east, the judgment is nigh.

Let's all take your avatar's advice. :nono2
 
And so it begins. When those of us who suggested that opening the door to gay marriage or "civil unions" would open the door to all sorts of oddball efforts to fit square pegs into the round hole of marriage, the LGBT activists pooh-poohed the prediction, claiming "no one will want to marry a pig, or create a man-child marriage" or any of a hundred other ungodly concepts of "marriage."

Sadly, they were wrong, we were right. Look to the east, the judgment is nigh.


I agree with your sentiments...The only thing left is judgement...God sent the flood, because the world was so evil...I just cannot find adjectives to describe this kind of behaviour.
 
I don't see anything particularly wrong with this. Sure, it's a little unusual but it's hardly a sign of the apocalypse.

And my parents never had enough time for me when I was very little, having another parent would've been great.

And David had more than one wife. God was fine with it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And so it begins. When those of us who suggested that opening the door to gay marriage or "civil unions" would open the door to all sorts of oddball efforts to fit square pegs into the round hole of marriage, the LGBT activists pooh-poohed the prediction, claiming "no one will want to marry a pig, or create a man-child marriage" or any of a hundred other ungodly concepts of "marriage."

Sadly, they were wrong, we were right. Look to the east, the judgment is nigh.

Y'know, people HAVE married cows and children HAVE been married to men. None of these things saw the coming of the antichrist.

What's healthier? Having a secret and destructive affair or having an honest and open relationship with three people?
 
I don't see anything particularly wrong with this. Sure, it's a little unusual but it's hardly a sign of the apocalypse.

And my parents never had enough time for me when I was very little, having another parent would've been great.

And David had more than one wife. God was fine with it.



Prov 26: 4
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.

You don't see anything wrong with it...Would you marry a man:sad
 
Prov 26: 4
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.

You don't see anything wrong with it...Would you marry a man:sad

If I were gay and wanted to get married.
 
here we are talking about people who we don't know, calling them whatnot... i wish no-one could get married...
 
Y'know, people HAVE married cows and children HAVE been married to men.
Were they sanctioned by the government? NO! There's your difference.
What's healthier? Having a secret and destructive affair or having an honest and open relationship with three people?
If you believe that is healthy in the eyes of God, you have a bigger problem than I can help you deal with.
Let's all take your avatar's advice. :nono2
I actually have that sign on my wall, for my clients who can't seem to get past the issues of addiction, and, frankly, for me, when too many of them have used the sign that day. :help

Sometimes I wish I had one at home too.
 
I was kidding about the marrying of the cows etc.

And I don't think it's healthy in the eyes of God.

But considering i'm atheist It really doesn't matter to me.
 
I don't get it. Why not?

if there was no marriage, there would be just people who love other people.

look at the silly monkeys trading some hankypanky for some bananas, look at the silly monkeys trading their daughters for some land and cattle. PPPRRRLLLLLLLLL :P
 
Yeah
:wave

My gf is Christian and she thinks i'm one off the happiest people she knows.
You know why, and I am not trying to be smart here believe me I am not. But you are so happy being a non Christian because you don't know any better. The Bible says that the things we say to you is foolishness to you.
 
One time I was involved in a 4-way arrangement and one was with my math professor. This was not a love triangle, but a love quadrilateral.

NOT! Just kidding but you math types may like the humor. :lol
 
One time I was involved in a 4-way arrangement and one was with my math professor. This was not a love triangle, but a love quadrilateral.

NOT! Just kidding but you math types may like the humor. :lol

tim-from-pa

I was never good at maths..even to this day.:sad
 
Back
Top