IMO they are a pseudo Christian cult, and should be avoided.Seventh Day Adventist Church? Their religion has rules like that? I guess that's one more reason I'm not one of them. But I've known a few of them and never knew any to follow OT laws like that. Are there different sects which have different laws they make them follow?
They are a very judgmental group, and cheerfully condemn others who do not worship on Saturday or scrupulously follow the rules of a woman "prophetess" who had "visions" during her cataleptic trances and made up some silly rules to follow, claiming that these were from God because they could find snippets of Scripture to justify her visions.
Collectively, they are very works oriented, anti grace, and do not believe in the sufficiency of Scripture alone. They hate all the Ecumenical Creeds even though they cannot find anything wrong with them. Some of them believe Jesus is Michael the Archangel and that ultimately Satan will bear all of our sins. When a non SDA person dies he does not exist anymore; that is called annihilation. When the SDA person dies, s/he goes into "soul sleep". Hell is not eternal, and heaven is the reward of those who follow Ellen's rules because they are the "remnant church".
For those reasons, I believe that they are a cult. Others call them "heterodox" because they use the Bible as a ploy to justify their extra Biblical, contrary-to-Scripture beliefs.
Because this is such a controversial issue, I shall not proceed further except to make two links: The first is to the official CARM explanation on the SDA church and the second is to the SDA forum on CARM so that you and your friend can see the things that are discussed, and how they are discussed by the SDA posters, one or two of whom are SDA pastors.
Anyone can lurk, but to respond, you need to register.
BTW on a personal note, I thought MacArthur was Dispensational, and that was his basis for being against the Charismatics (the cessation of the Gifts of Holy Spirit). Now I see through his seminar called, "Strange Fire" I see that he is definitely Reformed, and as a whole, I appreciate the care in which he addressed the subject. However, it seemed as of he was using the obvious excesses of the "lunatic fringe" in order to attack the core of the Charismatics, and that is simply fallacious reasoning. That is evident in the panel discussion that followed.
Were you on stage then?
Last edited: