The question as you posed it was absurd.Which is absurd - the mechanisms of Darwinism, mutation and natural selection or the idea that mutation and natural selection are purposeless? Or both?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
The question as you posed it was absurd.Which is absurd - the mechanisms of Darwinism, mutation and natural selection or the idea that mutation and natural selection are purposeless? Or both?
:toofunnyAre you not confused per se?
Yet it still does not make evolution (even the Darwinian one) a random process.But mutations are random and according to you they are required if evolution is to move forward.
Yes, he seems to think that. At least he calls them random mutations.Does Mayr think mutations are random in his statement above?
Yet it still does not make evolution (even the Darwinian one) a random process.
Was he mistaken or are mutations random?Yes, he seems to think that. At least he calls them random mutations.
Do not forget that in the theory of evolution, these changes happened over billions of years.
The question as you posed it was absurd.
In a way, you could say that, yes.Is it then a process guided by intelligence?
Banana or polkadot?How so?
Good question. Are they truly random? Or are they guided? I don't know. From our human perspective they look random, but that is not to say they truly are.Was he mistaken or are mutations random?
Not anything and everything. Definitely not. But getting a positive mutation is statistically bound to happen now and then.Aw, yes - anything/everything (even the impossible) is possible given billions of year. Is that what you mean?
Can the naturalism of Darwinism and the special creation of God be pitted against each other?You cannot take two statements of your choosing and just randomly pit them against each other.
Not anything and everything. Definitely not. But getting a positive mutation is statistically bound to happen now and then.
In a way, you could say that, yes.
Yes, they can. But that is not even close to what you were asking, let me remind you:Can the naturalism of Darwinism and the special creation of God be pitted against each other?
If you want a better, more specific answer, you have to ask a better, more specific question. What do you have in mind when you say intelligence? Do you mean God? Then say so and don't wrap it in general nondescript terms. If you don't mean God, please describe precisely what you mean by intelligence, only then can you get a sensible answer.In what way? Will kalvan agree with you?
Yes, they can. But that is not even close to what you were asking, let me remind you:
Did man come to be in a random manner via mutation and natural selection or is mutation and natural selection purposeless?
Regarding question type, it is the same as (and try following the 'logic' of it side by side, you'll see the questions have the same structure):
Did John come up in a joyful manner via elevator or is the elevator blue?
John could have come up in the elevator even if it had been blue -- unless you presume he has a fear of that specific color -- because the color does not affect the way the elevator works. Both sentences have the elevator in them, but they are not mutually exclusive nor mutually inclusive, actually they have no effect on each other, thus it makes absolutely no sense to pit them against each other.
The structure, just in case:
Did 'X' happen in manner 'Y' via 'Z' or is 'Z' 'N'?
"Intelligence" in context was very clear - do you have your specs on? Guided intelligence vs purposeless naturalism.If you want a better, more specific answer, you have to ask a better, more specific question. What do you have in mind when you say intelligence? Do you mean God? Then say so and don't wrap it in general nondescript terms. If you don't mean God, please describe precisely what you mean by intelligence, only then can you get a sensible answer.
Why are you asking me if kalvan will agree, why don't you ask him?
As outlined before, the manner is not random. So no, man did not come to be in a random manner. Did he come to be via mutation and natural selection? It is possible.Did man come to be in a random manner via mutation and natural selection?
In itself? Yes, I would say so.Is mutation and natural selection purposeless?
No, it wasn't. If it was, I would have answered more directly. There can be a certain 'intelligence' within the natural process itself, even if you were to detach it from God. The word intelligence in your post wasn't even capitalized to denote it as something more. The word intelligence could be interpreted in many different ways. Please use more specific terms when they are available."Intelligence" in context was very clear - do you have your specs on? Guided intelligence vs purposeless naturalism.
I do. But you were asking me about lordkalvan's opinion, but you asked me about it. I don't see into his head any more than you do. So either you know the answer yourself, in which case the question was a provocation, or you don't know that answer yourself, but you now I don't know it either, so the question was again only a provocation.Because I wanted your opinion - do you not have one?