We both agree on that.
I would not say from, because by that you imply what you then state as well, that hydrogen created us. Instead, I would use the word through, as it is more clearly indicative that it was God who created us, and evolution was only the tool he used to do it, put into motion by Him.
As a (maybe not perfect) parallel I would use the production of a computer, let's say a MacBook. It is machined, soldered etc. in factories, by people and machines, but if you ask anyone who made the computer, you will pretty universally get the answer: Apple. The process behind it is something used to get to the final product, but it in itself didn't make the MacBook -- without Apple at the beginning of the process, the MacBook would never have emerged.
Also, during the process of making it, it is just a constituent of parts, not until late into the process does it become a real working computer. What is the step that makes that possible? You cannot really say. The way it is put together it is one specific part that finishes the construction of the computer as such, but with a tweaked construction process it could well be a different part that is added on last. Then you also have the software element. As in art as well, and other things, the whole is more than just the sum of the parts and the procedure.
So, yes, saying it was Evolution that created man is nonsense, but saying God put evolution in place, having designed everything to culminate in man, I don't personally have a problem accepting that, although I cannot of course say it is 100% correct.
Don't you think that the fact that science talks about creation in terms of the Big Bang and life emerging from non-living matter goes alongside the Biblical account? God breathing life into soil (non-living matter)? The Big Bang essentially being something that suddenly came from nothing? There still has to be something, or Someone behind it, who put it in motion, no?