Well, these things are like wall-paper I suppose. We have different kinds because people have different preferences. If others like this, great. But there were too many reenactments for my taste. I also prefer to have historians comment on people or events in history. If Donal Trump or other celebrities were used to explain how events created an atmosphere for them to thrive, okay, but don't have them in the place of historians, telling us about people and events.
Oh, and I've always heard the argument that our war was all about cotton. The South needed cotton production to sustain it's economy. It was crucial.
One of the best books I've ever read about American history was "George Washington: A Life" by Ron Chernow. This gives a very thorough account of the man who never, ever aspired to lead his country. He was asked to do it, so he reluctantly did out of obligation to the country he believed in. (When's the last time we had a leader who didn't aspire greatly to be in his position?) It also describes how close we were to losing the independence of our country. It's mind boggling to think that we were so close to never becoming what we did. Incredibly out-numbered, having a thin army of malnourished soldiers who didn't have adequate protection from the winter cold, Washington's strategic decisions resulted in a very improbable outcome.
Sorry, I didn't mean to get off topic like that.