An Exegesis of Hebrews 10:26-31 Loss of Salvation?

[VirginShallConceive]

Hey Virgin, so how do you receive salvation and intimacy from the Father? Blessings.

In a nutshell? Right here:
John 3:16

Who is the son of God?

Lame question.

If you asked a Jew this question, even though they don't agree, Jesus is the first image that would pop into their mind.

If you asked a Muslim this question, even though they don't agree, Isa is the first image that would pop into their mind.

 

[Doulos Iesou]

hmm..if this is the case then if we take this a saying that it is more than one and different kinds, then it would be inconsistent with the too many of the other salvation scriptures in the Bible. Which brings me back to OSAS.

You see this presupposes your interpretation of those passages, what passages are you referring to? My observations are not eisegesis, I'm merely drawing out what is present in the text and what it cannot refer to, and what I believe it is likely referring to.

A question for you, was "salvation" unable to be lost for those in Covenant relationship with God in the OT?

 

[Guest]

Hey Virgin, so how do you receive salvation and intimacy from the Father? Blessings.

In a nutshell? Right here:
John 3:16

Who is the son of God?

Lame question.

If you asked a Jew this question, even though they don't agree, Jesus is the first image that would pop into their mind.

If you asked a Muslim this question, even though they don't agree, Isa is the first image that would pop into their mind.

but i'm asking you. this is never a lame question.

 

[Doulos Iesou]

Well, we could take your route, and somehow accept every word of every version of the "66 books" that we currently have access to. We could take your route, and when a passage contradicts with another passage or contradicts with reality, we could muster up some weak explanation that "makes it all better" and quickly think about something else. The more we do this, I admit, the better we will become at it. That way, when archaeologists find another version that is even older than the countless versions that we already have, and it turns our world upside down, we will be better prepared for it.

Hey, then again, maybe it's just me. Maybe I am listening to the wrong spirit. I will try praying to the Father and the Son to see if my "Holy Spirit" spirit is legitimate . .

If you read the Scripture, it doesn't tell you to pray to see if you are hearing from the right Spirit, it tells you to discern based on what it is leading you to BELIEVE. I know that your spirit that you have been listening to is not the Holy Spirit because it causes you to reject clear and consistent Biblical teaching, given via apostolic authority where there is no diversity in the early manuscripts to believe it may have been altered. You do know they would have had to alter THOUSANDS of manuscripts in order to to fool us... right?

I trust the Word of God that endures forever over my sometimes faulty perceptions and logic. Others.. cave, and jump too quickly. It's sad.

 

[VirginShallConceive]

hmm..if this is the case then if we take this a saying that it is more than one and different kinds, then it would be inconsistent with the too many of the other salvation scriptures in the Bible. Which brings me back to OSAS.

You see this presupposes your interpretation of those passages, what passages are you referring to? My observations are not eisegesis, I'm merely drawing out what is present in the text and what it cannot refer to, and what I believe it is likely referring to.

A question for you, was "salvation" unable to be lost for those in Covenant relationship with God in the OT?

Right here, Doulos. My point has been rectified.

Ha ha ha ha ha!

 

[Doulos Iesou]

Right here, Doulos. My point has been rectified.

Ha ha ha ha ha!

You don't actually think I believe there is a contradiction do you? Far from it... Get on with yourself, you deny Scripture and receive inspiration from foreign spirits. I will not discuss the Word with those like you who claim to be Christians.

 

[VirginShallConceive]

If you read the Scripture, it doesn't tell you to pray to see if you are hearing from the right Spirit, it tells you to discern based on what it is leading you to BELIEVE. I know that your spirit that you have been listening to is not the Holy Spirit because it causes you to reject clear and consistent Biblical teaching, given via apostolic authority where there is no diversity in the early manuscripts to believe it may have been altered. You do know they would have had to alter THOUSANDS of manuscripts in order to to fool us... right?

I trust the Word of God that endures forever over my sometimes faulty perceptions and logic. Others.. cave, and jump too quickly. It's sad.

Oh yeah?
What do you think of the Comma Johanneum? Huh? Or the Pericope Adulterae? Huh? Or Mark 16:9-20(NASB)?

 

[Guest]

You don't actually think I believe there is a contradiction do you? Far from it... Get on with yourself, you deny Scripture and receive inspiration from foreign spirits. I will not discuss the Word with those like you who claim to be Christians.

Virgin is also having trouble telling me who the son of God is, interesting..

 

[VirginShallConceive]

Who is the son of God?

Lame question.

If you asked a Jew this question, even though they don't agree, Jesus is the first image that would pop into their mind.

If you asked a Muslim this question, even though they don't agree, Isa is the first image that would pop into their mind.

but i'm asking you. this is never a lame question.

Never a lame question? Okay. Who is the God in Genesis 1:1?

a) YHWH
b) Thor
c) Zeus
d) Elohim



You're absolutely right. It's never lame.

 

[reba]

closed for moderator review