GraceBwithU said:
MEC,
I must agree with handy, this is the same subject as the locked graven image thread. We should never take scripture out of context. The first three commandments are meant to complete the commandments of our worship, (3 as is 7, 10, and 12 a completion number) The creation of spiritual art does not condemn the artist....even if it did, (which I do not think it does), it's existance would not condemn us unless we used it as a mediator in worship. Their is but one mediator between God and man...and that is Jesus Christ.
Actually Grace,
I haven't EVEN mentioned ANY commandment so far. I have 'mentioned graven images' but NOT in context to the commandments.
Did you EVEN read what I have posted or just the first paragraph?
You offer that there is BUT one 'mediator' between us and God. Let me ask you this: HOW many DEMONS are 'mediators' between US and Satan? Or is this EVEN a 'subject' that you care to discuss?
What do YOU know of demons? How about Satan Himself. Ever MET him? Do you BELIEVE in him? Not, do you follow him, but do you BELIEVE that he EXISTS and HAS dominion over this WORLD?
So, while you are awful QUICK to condemn my offering of this thread, you have offered NOTHING in response to the INFORMATION offered within it.
And Grace, do you KNOW that what is CONSIDERED 'Christian' music in todays 'Christian community' IS INDEED music that IS inspired BY God or His Son? Would NOT Satan take the praise EVEN in the 'name of Christ' if we were WILLING to GIVE it? Or do you NOT believe that we battle with powers and principalities that we KNOW LITTLE ABOUT?
Is EVERYTHING 'called' God the ACTUAL 'Creator'? Could I NOT sing a song that 'appeared' to BE in praise of God but in REALITY 'my god' BEING Satan and HIM to WHOM the song was 'created and sung' to?
So, firstly, as I have already offered; The REASON that the 'other thread' was locked was NOT due to it's SUBJECT. I don't think any but a 'particular group' was offended by ANYTHING that I had to offer. But it 'started' to get 'personal' and BECAUSE it was UNABLE to be continued, even after WARNINGS, it was locked.
But I didn't offer this to discuss denominations, nor to discuss the 'commandment' to which you refered. I started THIS thread in the hopes of being ABLE to offer some 'understanding' on the subject of INSPIRATION and WHERE IT comes from. Not whether a particular PIECE of art is 'holy' or 'unholy', but rather IF 'art' CAN be considered 'unholy'.
Now, since you have 'chosen' to participate, let me ask YOU a question:
IF you wanted to PROTECT your child from a neighbors child that YOU considered to BE a 'bad influence'. What RULE would you MAKE in order to INSURE that YOU had DONE everything WITHIN your capabilities to AVOID your child 'getting into trouble' with this 'other child'? Would you offer the 'rule'; you can ONLY play with this child UNDER supervision, or would you simply deny your child the ABILITY to play with this child by DEMANDING that he NOT have relations with him?
Serious question and I'm curious as to your answer. So, if you are willing to appease my curiosity, by all means, let's hear it.
MEC
MEC