Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

BLOOD TEST FOR CANCER DETECTION

as a man of science- i think its very dangerous lately to trust any kind of science
even a doctor claiming you to have cancer has been found to be false, cases of such where a doctor would claim women to have breast cancer, later it was found that they didnt- now missing one breast! its always risky to let someone else decide for you about things you cannot verify for yourself, and many doctors are extremely corrupt and evil people
even the whole method for them to handle cancers is- questionable, i believe they oftenly rupture the sac containing cancer cells (by my understanding these are mutated and corrupted cells that are being kept away from healthy cells)
and this causes the cancer cells to get back into the body where they can once again cause damage

an advice from a man that studied cancer at university and decided to opt out- because the research he was doing and the cures they did have would never see the daylight- was to simply not care for cancer if you live a natural life, eat healthy and especially important to avoid having too much fat, as cancer cannot live in muscle, but in fat rather, he recommended zinc supplements

what is happening lately, and in the near future i consider to be a blessing to earth, some have claimed that they found hints in the bible that only 25% of the earths population will cease while the ruling hand has much more planned
 
Maybe we got something out of all the COVID jabs that have caused problems for so many persons.
Looks like there's a general blood tests for cancer very close to being approved.
Any comments from those that will read the article?


Great news if they can do that. Early detection is critical.
 
Maybe we got something out of all the COVID jabs that have caused problems for so many persons.
Looks like there's a general blood tests for cancer very close to being approved.
Any comments from those that will read the article?


I think many times "inquiring minds" do not want to know. What a life changer that would be.
 
as a man of science- i think its very dangerous lately to trust any kind of science
even a doctor claiming you to have cancer has been found to be false, cases of such where a doctor would claim women to have breast cancer, later it was found that they didnt- now missing one breast! its always risky to let someone else decide for you about things you cannot verify for yourself, and many doctors are extremely corrupt and evil people
even the whole method for them to handle cancers is- questionable, i believe they oftenly rupture the sac containing cancer cells (by my understanding these are mutated and corrupted cells that are being kept away from healthy cells)
and this causes the cancer cells to get back into the body where they can once again cause damage

an advice from a man that studied cancer at university and decided to opt out- because the research he was doing and the cures they did have would never see the daylight- was to simply not care for cancer if you live a natural life, eat healthy and especially important to avoid having too much fat, as cancer cannot live in muscle, but in fat rather, he recommended zinc supplements

what is happening lately, and in the near future i consider to be a blessing to earth, some have claimed that they found hints in the bible that only 25% of the earths population will cease while the ruling hand has much more planned
I'm old enough to remember when blood transfusions were necessary if the white cell count dropped below 1.
30 years ago my mother received shots instead of blood transfusions.
Today there are methods of getting chemo straight to the tumor instead of spreading it all over the bodily organs.

There's progress and it will only get better.

And, let me add, we depend on science every day for different reasons.
Nothing wrong with it as long as we understand the limitations.
 
I'm old enough to remember when blood transfusions were necessary if the white cell count dropped below 1.
30 years ago my mother received shots instead of blood transfusions.
Today there are methods of getting chemo straight to the tumor instead of spreading it all over the bodily organs.

There's progress and it will only get better.

And, let me add, we depend on science every day for different reasons.
Nothing wrong with it as long as we understand the limitations.
yes, in the perfect world i would agree, but the ones who got the money dont have good intentions, its more profitable to keep people sick rather than curing them. we can make lightbulbs that last forever, but then the factory would go out of business, as would the doctors.
 
yes, in the perfect world i would agree, but the ones who got the money dont have good intentions, its more profitable to keep people sick rather than curing them. we can make lightbulbs that last forever, but then the factory would go out of business, as would the doctors.
Yes. I agree that this happens.
It's a shame man is so greedy even to the detriment of his fellow man.
About 15 years ago I'd heard about nano vehicles that could carry medicine to any part of the body. Never heard of it again. They do this to get more money for experiments.

Now I come to hear Dr. James Tour speak about nano vehicles. Interesting stuff.
 
I think it's awesome if they can actually do this. I wonder about the cost first. Will it be affordable? We all know cancer treatments and tests are expensive. I also wonder what will happen if they keep finding ways to keep everyone alive. We are facing a situation according to the news that we will be out of food in 27 yrs and water by 2035. The longer they keep us alive the worse things will get. I'm not saying they should let people die on purpose but, honestly, who wants to live to be in their 100s? The body is on a downward trajectory from the time we're born til we're declared dead. We all have to go eventually. And the more they keep us alive the more problems we're gonna face with living arrangements and medical care. There are many docs & surgeons who don't want to put the effort in to take care of the older population. I overheard a surgeon talking one day about an exploratory surgery where they did on an old lady. He made the remark that the lady had a huge hernia and he wasn't even gonna mess with it. So, let's presume for a moment she has had the blood test and they go in and treat her but leave the hernia there. What's the point in taking care of the tumor if they don't want to remove the hernia because it would be a pain? Maybe I seem unreasonable but, the longer we live the more resources will be needed to care for these people. Nursing homes and hospitals are already stressed because of Covid and all the new things working their way into our environments. Nursing personnel are leaving in droves. Nursing homes are already full and operating on the minimal amount of staff. How much more can these areas take before there's a collapse in the system?
 
About 15 years ago I'd heard about nano vehicles that could carry medicine to any part of the body.
they are already in use, they are triggered by specific wavelenghts, its an important piece in the puzzle- so important that i dont wanna go in detail about this one
 
Maybe we got something out of all the COVID jabs that have caused problems for so many persons.
Looks like there's a general blood tests for cancer very close to being approved.
Any comments from those that will read the article?


Where do you see that this comes from covid jabs?

I agree with the science guy. I can read the original article but in the past, when a scientific piece was presented in popular magazines, they usually exaggerate the findings. So I am very skeptical that this research even comes close to what the article proposes. During the covid trials, if a healthy control came down with extreme adverse responses, like unable to walk or palsy or anything beyond mild pain in the arm, they were eliminated from the study. Adverse events were followed for only a limited number of weeks to reduce the number of adverse events from the injections. Scientists ambitious to publish are as trustworthy as used car salesman. Not saying science does not advance in improved care same as I am not saying all used cars are junk.
 
they dont just exaggerate things, theyre completely legally allowed to re-run their experiment thousands of times and discard anything they dont like, and have zero backup of all their experiment results
the scientific method relies on replication to prove what is real and whats not, and since the replication - (being able to dothe same experiment, and get same results) is so low, then it means that AT LEAST 50% of the scientists are corrupt liars!
i believe in some trials... 85% had a miscarriage, its very obvious to me whats happening, the people who fund this very science has been very open with their intentions
im very happy that i stuck to science in my freetime and didnt commit to it as a career, i still do talk to people that go to university and work in the fields and they oftenly voice their frustrations with how evil the people they are among are
 
Not from the COVID vaccines specifically but even before COVID there had been some ongoing research into mRNA technology and one of the encouraging potential applications is the possibility of using the technology to fight cancer. I haven't heard recently of any new news in that regard.
 
Back
Top