C
Catholic Crusader
Guest
- Thread starter
- #41
here's your link: http://www.cin.org/users/james/files/deuteros.htmlargeli said:..,..could help me out with a link or something?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/
here's your link: http://www.cin.org/users/james/files/deuteros.htmlargeli said:..,..could help me out with a link or something?
Catholic Crusader said:Now, can we move on from this?
Catholic Crusader said:Okalee Dokaley
CC said:And you cannot prove that the Deuterocanonicals are not inspired.
Francis said:So where is this "rule" that something must be quoted by proto-canonical Scriptures for a deutro-canonical to be valid? That would rule out the entire NT series after the Pastorals with the exception of 1 John and 1 Peter... Could you be consistent at least?
Paidion said:...Assumptions and more assumptions! More attacks on a straw man.....
It wasn't the CHURCH of the first two centuries, I assure you!The Church that canonized the New Testament is the same Church that canonized the an Old Testament containing the Deuterocanonicals.
Paidion said:It wasn't the CHURCH of the first two centuries, I assure you!.....The Church that canonized the New Testament is the same Church that canonized the an Old Testament containing the Deuterocanonicals.
Paidion said:Francis said:So where is this "rule" that something must be quoted by proto-canonical Scriptures for a deutro-canonical to be valid? That would rule out the entire NT series after the Pastorals with the exception of 1 John and 1 Peter... Could you be consistent at least?
More assumption, more strawmen, and an unjustified accusation.
I have never appealed to any such "rule". The reason I stated the fact that the "Deutrocanonical" books have never been quoted by the apostles, is as stated above in my response to CC.
Paidion said:Although your church gradually developed from the early CHURCH, it is a dramatically different organization. Indeed, the early CHURCH was not an organization at all.
Paidion said:People can join the Catholic Church. But no one could join the CHURCH which Jesus founded. Rather the LORD added people to that CHURCH those who were being saved. [Acts 2:47]
vic C. said:Enough! This is NOT a dispute over the early church and what they have become, nor is this a Baptism thread. Some of you have taken a simple question about the origin of the Christian Bible and made it a weapon of war.
On the first page, Hezekiah said this would open up a big can of worms. Although correct, it doesn't have to end that way. Lets get back on target or consider this discussion over.
Thanks,
Vic