[_ Old Earth _] CERN 1st Extinction Event Experiment Planned for 11 Nov. 2010

[Strangelove]

Some ominous news starting to come out regarding the European Organization for Nuclear Research and their upcoming experiments at the Large Hadron Collider on the Switzerland / France border.

From what I can gather they will be attempting to create new matter from energy by collidng particles in this machine and have the chance to produce things called "Strangelets". Extemely dangerous.

The irresponsibility of CERN’s physicists who plan to do those experiments with quark liquid explosives here on Earth, without even the slightest military or political supervision, has been denounced in Courts and Internet blogs, to not avail, since the LHC is a machine ‘too big to fail’, defended by technocrats, nuclear industries/ physicists and the corporate press, with the same zeal they defended nuclear weapons during the cold war, when that name was still ‘politically correct’. Now we have proofs that the European Company of Nuclear Research has been lying to the public about the probabilities of those catastrophic scenarios. In those internal documents CERN affirms that the LHC has enough potency to create strangelets, a strange liquid explosive that is responsible of the ice-9 reaction that converts stars into Super-novas. The Company has even a machine, CASTOR, for Centauro and STrangelet detecTOR, built to study them. Since the ‘Castor Team’ affirms the LHC will ‘likely’ create stable strangelets this 11/9. In the graph, we observe the entire range of LHC’s potency and the type of quark explosives this ‘quark canon’, the layman name this machine should have, will produce. Strangelets are made of usd quarks, deconfined in lead to lead collisions starting 11/9/2010…

More info here - cerntruth.com/?p=125

Thoughts?

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the world's largest and highest-energy particle accelerator. It is expected that it will address the most fundamental questions of physics, advancing our understanding of the deepest laws of nature.
The LHC lies in a tunnel 27 kilometres (17 mi) in circumference, as much as 175 metres (574 ft) beneath the Franco-Swiss border near Geneva, Switzerland. This synchrotron is designed to collide opposing particle beams of either protons at an energy of 7 teraelectronvolts (1.12 microjoules) per particle, or lead nuclei at an energy of 574 TeV (92.0 µJ) per nucleus.[1][2] The term hadron refers to particles composed of quarks.

The Large Hadron Collider was built by the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) with the intention of testing various predictions of high-energy physics, including the existence of the hypothesized Higgs boson[3] and of the large family of new particles predicted by supersymmetry.[4] It is funded by and built in collaboration with over 10,000 scientists and engineers from over 100 countries as well as hundreds of universities and laboratories.[5]

On 10 September 2008, the proton beams were successfully circulated in the main ring of the LHC for the first time,[6] but 9 days later operations were halted due to a serious fault.[7] On 20 November 2009 they were successfully circulated again,[8] with the first proton–proton collisions being recorded 3 days later at the injection energy of 450 GeV per beam.[9] After the 2009 winter shutdown, the LHC was restarted and the beam was ramped up to 3.5 TeV per beam,[10] half its designed energy,[11] which is planned for after its 2012 shutdown. On 30 March 2010, the first planned collisions took place between two 3.5 TeV beams, which set a new world record for the highest-energy man-made particle collisions.
Wiki - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider

 

[Strangelove]

Safety of particle collisions at the Large Hadron Collider

The safety of particle collisions at the Large Hadron Collider has been questioned in the media, on the Internet and through the courts. Particle physics experiments were ongoing as of March 2010 at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the world's largest and most powerful particle accelerator, built by the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) near Geneva, in Switzerland.[1][2] The claimed dangers of the LHC particle collisions, which began in November 2009, include doomsday scenarios involving the production of stable micro black holes and the creation of hypothetical particles called strangelets.

More here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safety_of_particle_collisions_at_the_Large_Hadron_Collider#Safety_concerns

 

[Strangelove]

Safety of particle collisions

The experiments at the Large Hadron Collider sparked fears among the public that the particle collisions might produce doomsday phenomena, involving the production of stable microscopic black holes or the creation of hypothetical particles called strangelets.[58] Two CERN-commissioned safety reviews examined these concerns and concluded that the experiments at the LHC present no danger and that there is no reason for concern,[59][60][61] a conclusion expressly endorsed by the American Physical Society.

From - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider#Safety_of_particle_collisions
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

So...we have 3 citations there pronouncing the safety of these wacky experiments. One links straight to CERNS own website. Not surprising they say everythings fine there.

The second citation links to a nearly decade old CERN report:

CERN 2003–001
28 February 2003
Theoretical Physics
Division

Third citation links to a Statement by the Executive Committee of the DPF. which itself cites a CERN press release, the CERN report of the LHC Safety Assessment Group and says it was independently reviewed by an international team
whose members were:

Peter Braun-Munzinger [Division head of ALICE, CERES, HADES experiments at CERN] ,

Metteo Cavalli-Sforze [tours the world giving talks such as "The LHC – exploring the mysteries of matter, force and space at a new frontier"] ,

Gerard 't Hooft [no direct connection to CERN that I can find]

Bryan Webber [CERN Academic Training lectures on QCD]

Fabio Zwirner [Conducts Academic Training talking about The Hunt for the Higgs Particle].

Great so.....pretty much all of thepeople heading up the review for the safety report either work for CERN or their livings depend on it.

Peachy!

Nothing to worry about. Disperse immediately, nothing to see here. Everythings fine.2

 

[Strangelove]

CERN LHC Black Holes and Strangelets - May Appear Years Later and Destroy World

[video=youtube;YZAQn-KxW_k]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZAQn-KxW_k&feature=related[/video]

 

[jasoncran]

i'm no physics major but not make a black hole one needs some serious graviometric forces along with some mass to compress.

to bad the athiest the physisct isnt on that much anymore. or the christian chemist izzy.

 

[Pebbles]

i'm no physics major but not make a black hole one needs some serious graviometric forces along with some mass to compress.

to bad the athiest the physisct isnt on that much anymore. or the christian chemist izzy.

No it dosen't it's not a black hole in the way you think it is they would be quantum singularities by the random recombination of subatomic particles whitch would be impossibly small much smaller than a proton and would convert into energy. (as black holes evaporate at that scale it would vanish in a nanosecond)

There isn't enough mass or power in the LHC to make a stable black hole with any significant mass.

I'm curious why you all think it's unsafe?

 

[Strangelove]

No it dosen't it's not a black hole in the way you think it is they would be quantum singularities by the random recombination of subatomic particles whitch would be impossibly small much smaller than a proton and would convert into energy. (as black holes evaporate at that scale it would vanish in a nanosecond)

There isn't enough mass or power in the LHC to make a stable black hole with any significant mass.

I'm curious why you all think it's unsafe?

Did you read any of my posts Pebbles?

 

[jasoncran]

No it dosen't it's not a black hole in the way you think it is they would be quantum singularities by the random recombination of subatomic particles whitch would be impossibly small much smaller than a proton and would convert into energy. (as black holes evaporate at that scale it would vanish in a nanosecond)

There isn't enough mass or power in the LHC to make a stable black hole with any significant mass.

I'm curious why you all think it's unsafe?

i'm not the one that thinks its unsafe i was stating that it not possible on the large scale.

lol. gravity wells.

or zero point modules, interesting, hawkins i think theorised this.

 

[lordkalvan]

Anybody got any updates on the end of the world thanks to CERN?

 

[jasoncran]

Anybody got any updates on the end of the world thanks to CERN?

i'm dead and this is hell. sorry lk we didnt make it.

hey satan,

satan"yes my son"

dad, why?

satan"because i'm me"

some people, lk i may not agree with you but i do respect you.

 

[lordkalvan]

Heh-heh. Reps to both.