Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Charles Darwin a big sexist!

G

Guest

Guest
:B-fly: Charles Darwin is said to not only be a racist but an extreme
sexist. That is a very interesting twist on things since many followers of
Darwin claim that God is sexist and that Paul was a sexist.
here is some of the information about Darwin.: http://www.rae.org/women.html
 
cubedbee said:
So which religion did Darwin found again?
Did Darwin found a religion? He brought out an old religious belief
when he started teaching about evolution. It is no wonder that many
christians believe that evolution goes along nicely with scriptures.
It's always been connected with religious beliefs.
Evolution wasn't invented by Darwin,or even his Grand -father.
Darwin was suppose to have been a christian himself at one time.
 
How does the fact that Darwin may have been a sexist/racist/child murderer/rapist discredit the theory of evolution (which is obviously what you're trying to do)?
 
Heathen said:
How does the fact that Darwin may have been a sexist/racist/child murderer/rapist discredit the theory of evolution (which is obviously what you're trying to do)?
It is obvious. If you believe in evilution, you will also become a sexist, child murdering, tofu eating, NSync-loving, pot head who attends lesbian midget orgies and sun bathes in overalls.

Quath
 
Heathen said:
How does the fact that Darwin may have been a sexist/racist/child murderer/rapist discredit the theory of evolution (which is obviously what you're trying to do)?

:angel: Thats so strange coming from you. You say those very same
things about God and about my brother Paul,yet you have no evidence.
Who ever wishes to believe in evolution is fine with me, except As I have
said many times before,I don't understand how an atheist can believe in it.
 
Quath said:
Heathen said:
How does the fact that Darwin may have been a sexist/racist/child murderer/rapist discredit the theory of evolution (which is obviously what you're trying to do)?
It is obvious. If you believe in evilution, you will also become a sexist, child murdering, tofu eating, NSync-loving, pot head who attends lesbian midget orgies and sun bathes in overalls.

Quath

8-) Quath,it's not easy for me to get sore at you,so why are you going
over board here. You know I was just playing with you about the shallow
mind thing don't you?
 
blueeyeliner said:
Quath,it's not easy for me to get sore at you,so why are you going over board here. You know I was just playing with you about the shallow mind thing don't you?
I didn't take it seriously. I was just having fun with this topic. I hope I didn't hurt your feelings.

Quath
 
Quath said:
Heathen said:
How does the fact that Darwin may have been a sexist/racist/child murderer/rapist discredit the theory of evolution (which is obviously what you're trying to do)?
It is obvious. If you believe in evilution, you will also become a sexist, child murdering, tofu eating, NSync-loving, pot head who attends lesbian midget orgies and sun bathes in overalls.

Quath


:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Quath said:
blueeyeliner said:
Quath,it's not easy for me to get sore at you,so why are you going over board here. You know I was just playing with you about the shallow mind thing don't you?
I didn't take it seriously. I was just having fun with this topic. I hope I didn't hurt your feelings.

Quath

:B-fly: You didn't. Your pretty swell to hang out with Quath.
 
Blue, this is the difference:

Paul taught morality and spiritualism. How to live your life.

Darwin has to do with evolution only(as far as we are concerned).

Paul morals (i.e. whether or not he is a sexist) is an important discussion if you use his teachings as a guideline for how you should live your life.

Darwin makes no such claims, he only created a theory that explains the diversity of life on earth. Thus, his morality and beliefs are irrelevant.

For example, if Pythagorus was a child molester, does that mean that the Pythagorum theory is no longer valid? Of course not, because he theory does not teach morality or theology.

If Paul thought that lightening was only a flash of light, and not that it was the same as static electricity, does that make his theology invalid? Of course not.

That is why it is important to look at Paul through the lens of theology and morality. Whether or not he believed two objects of different weights feel to the earth at the same speed is irrelevant to his teachings. I could care less about his thoughts on science, only his theology (unless he makes certain scientific claims through theology).

Likewise, Darwin's must be examined solely on the basis of the underlying scientific assumptions behind it. Whether or not he molested goats, was a Muslim or liked to poop on people's doorsteps is irrelevant.

Einstein was a womanizer. Newton was rude and very petty. Galileo stole ideas from others. Stephen Hawking reads Playboy. Who cares! Only the science is relevant.
 
:B-fly: Thinkerman, it is very important that those who are trying to
teach, lead or be role models, be fair and show equality. That is even
more true of those who are non-christian, because many people don't
like christianity. They feel that it's either too hard or too sexist
or in some way not right or fair.

The un-believer normally wants to find equality in the world because
they don't think it's in the bible.

Darwin felt that men were superior to women, even in the evolution theory he was teaching.
All people want to be treated nice, whether they are Christian or not.
Darwin's personal life is one thing but he also believed it in what he
was teaching.
 
Thinkerman, it is very important that those who are trying to
teach, lead or be role models, be fair and show equality. That is even
more true of those who are non-christian, because many people don't
like christianity. They feel that it's either too hard or too sexist
or in some way not right or fair.

Not if they are teaching science, which can be independently verified.

If my preacher says God doesn't want me to be gay, but then he himself is a homosexual, then it calls into question the theological lessons he has given me.

If my math teacher says 2+5=7, and he is a pedophile. I can get a barrel of oranges and confirm the math.

The un-believer normally wants to find equality in the world because
they don't think it's in the bible.

Wrong Blue. Most non-believers do not search for "why", the search for "what".

The world is what it is. It is sometimes cruel and unfair, and sometimes wonderful and pleasant. It is a function of the chance and evolution and our own decisions.

Non-believers simply strive to accept the world for what it is, make changes where we can, and live within the time and world we were born in. Nothing more, nothing less.

We do not try to find equality, but many of us do try to practice it.


Darwin felt that men were superior to women, even in the evolution theory he was teaching.

Like I said, I don't care. Even if Darwin did make statements about how to live one's life or sexism, that is completely irrelevant to his scholarship regarding evolution.

I think I demonstrated that with my references to other great scientists. They are not necessarily good guys, they are just brilliant observer of the world around us.

All people want to be treated nice, whether they are Christian or not.

I could not agree more Blue. That is really the fundamental moral of existing in a society.

I only wish more people practiced that, and didn't rely on scripture or religion to justify their hate or fear of different people.

Darwin's personal life is one thing but he also believed it in what he
was teaching.

Again, only his scientific points are relevant to me. Everything else I couldn't give a fig.
 
ThinkerMan:
I only wish more people practiced that, and didn't rely on scripture or religion to justify their hate or fear of different people.

Darwin's personal life is one thing but he also believed it in what he
was teaching.

Again, only his scientific points are relevant to me. Everything else I couldn't give a fig.

:B-fly: Again,there seems to be a great big myth that some believe
about christians. Some individuals believe that christians are just
christians because they are brainwashed or don't know any better,
but thats all wrong! True christians know exactly why they are saved.
many are like myself who are saved because they know God is alive
and that the Holy Spirit testifies to the truth of the holy bible.
Whether anyone can accept this or not,thats the facts and no one can
change it. False religions show hate,not the true christians. The true
christian is not religious,they have a relationship with God The Father,the
Son and The Spirit. God changes everything,and only a true christian can
know this.
There are fakes in everything,and there is good and bad in everything.
To say that all christians use their faith to excuse bad behavior is a lie
straight from the devil himself,amen.
Darwin was a sexist in and out of his so called ideas.
Darwin was not a scientist. Darwin realised he could write books,and
his Grand Father had simular ideas before him.
To be educated in theology,it strongly appears that Darwin no doubt
know about ancient religions and their pagan beliefs.
Science? No. Religion,Yes. That was what Darwin really learned about.
It appears that we can all freely call anything science if we wish to,but
religion is what evolution has the most to do with even if some people
try to seperate the evolution part from it's roots,it still came from ancient
religions,and that proves it's not new or even something that anyone can
call original.Anyone can believe in evolution,it's amazing to me that any
one who claims to be an atheist would because you'd think they wouldn't
have anything to do with anything that has to do with religion on any
level. That must be a myth too.
because evolution cannot be proven,you must have faith to believe in it.
I think everyone who is interested in this subject should study about the
life of darwin and his Grand father and others in his day,and research also
everything they can on ancient religions and evlolution. They were here
long before Darwin and Darwin got his education in Theology,not science.
 
blueeyeliner said:
To be educated in theology,it strongly appears that Darwin no doubt know about ancient religions and their pagan beliefs. Science? No. Religion,Yes. That was what Darwin really learned about.
If you are really interested in knowing about Darwin in his college years, check out the following link: http://www.aboutdarwin.com/timeline/time_03.html. You tell a lot about him from this timeline.

Quath
 
Quath/blueeyeliner" To be educated in theology,it strongly appears that Darwin no doubt know about ancient religions and their pagan beliefs. Science? No. Religion,Yes. That was what Darwin really learned about.]
If you are really interested in knowing about Darwin in his college years, check out the following http://www.aboutdarwin.com/timeline/time_03.html[/url]. You tell a lot about him from this timeline.

Quath

8-) Darwin is Darwin. You either love him or you don't.
I am uncovering more about Darwin,but he's not the only
one. Evolution is not the real issue. It's about the personality
of Darwin and why anyone would believe him. Why would
an atheist or anyone accept his claims given his mind set?
No matter what some may say,if you listen to someone who
is clearly proven to be incapable of making informed choices,
how can you be taken seriously?
There are so many sites about Darwin on the internet,I doubt we
could get through them all in a weeks time.
here is a special site about evolution though.
http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/
 
I don't believe Darwin's theory because of who he was or his character. I believe it because of the observable evidence he shows and I agree with his conclusions. If Hitler himself had come up with the idea, it doesn't make it right or wrong. Ultimately, the physical evidence and predictions of the model determine our confidence in our ability to trust it.

Quath
 
Quath said:
I don't believe Darwin's theory because of who he was or his character. I believe it because of the observable evidence he shows and I agree with his conclusions. If Hitler himself had come up with the idea, it doesn't make it right or wrong. Ultimately, the physical evidence and predictions of the model determine our confidence in our ability to trust it.

Quath

:P Quath,if what you say is the truth,we could all see it,but as it
is,no one can observe evolution.
Certainly a person's integrity or the lack thereof proves alot about
them as well as their biases.

http://www.unmaskingevolution.com/32-darkages.htm
http://www.unmaskingevolution.com/main. ... _what_I_do
 
Back
Top