Child Porn or Fashion Art

[PillsburyDoughboy]

Nude children in art and fashion, is it really art? Throughout the years many magazines have printed nude pictures of children all of which were deemed controversial and child porn, they claim it is art or fashion and how about the famous photographer Jacques Bourboulon who photographed nude teens in the 70's and his daughter at age 11 was the youngest girl to ever be a playboy pictorial in 76. ANd Brooke Shield's photos of her nude from the waist up, oiled and wearing make up at age 10.

 

[PillsburyDoughboy]

Another question here is how are these kids parents allowing someone to take nude photos of their kids?

 

[jasoncran]

it should made illegal for the safety of the child.

 

[PillsburyDoughboy]

another one, what about sites, and magazines with pics that are called modeling but the little girls are in their underwear spreading their legs, or pulling up their dresses, that to me is not modeling, if would be different if they were in their underwear just standing there like in an underwear ad but they are posed provactively, Don't ask how I know any of this info we all have past lives we are not proud of,

 

[TheCatholic]

it should made illegal for the safety of the child.

.

Hmmm. As a kid I remember one of the most famous ads there were was the Coppertone ad.

Was that child porn?

 

[jasoncran]

it should made illegal for the safety of the child.

.

Hmmm. As a kid I remember one of the most famous ads there were was the Coppertone ad.

Was that child porn?

good point, but what is being discussed is the showing of children in sexual positions are or provactive pose.

 

[TheCatholic]

good point, but what is being discussed is the showing of children in sexual positions are or provactive pose.

Well, obviously THAT is unacceptable. But I have never seen any of that in general advertising, have you?

 

[jasoncran]

good point, but what is being discussed is the showing of children in sexual positions are or provactive pose.

Well, obviously THAT is unacceptable. But I have never seen any of that in general advertising, have you?

no, the op adress parents who post pics of their kids for modeling jobs online.

 

[NoMoreSilence]

What I have seen in my experience is that many websites will purposely post pictures of children that are nearly nude (little girls in thongs, microbikinis, etc) and in very provocative poses, because they can legally do that and not have it deemed pornographic by the authorities. However, it's all the same to me, a teenager in a bikini on the cover of SEVENTEEN magazine in a provocative pose is, to me, pornographic. But to the general public it's widely accepted, sadly enough.

 

[PillsburyDoughboy]

.

Hmmm. As a kid I remember one of the most famous ads there were was the Coppertone ad.

Was that child porn?

actually this ad doesn't exist anymore and as for the bottle the little girl's butt crack is no longer showing on it

 

[jasoncran]

I saw the original ad on a billboard last yr. That's the young actress jodie foster.

 

[Biblereader]

It's sick, and demonic.
It comes from the pits of hell.

It causes confusion, and every evil work, and evil against
defenseless children.

 

[NoMoreSilence]

I agree with Biblereader.

 

[LostSoul]

Think that in such cases not only the photographers or company doing it should be sued, but he parents should be tried as well. After all their consent is needed. Unless of course the child is doing it behind their parent's back, which may be possible of a teen, these younger ones though....it is doubtful.

 

[NoMoreSilence]

Many parents do it with good intentions, of putting their child through college. The parents do get paid a lot of money for their child to model, but I do believe that soon enough, even child fashion art will be illegal, as it well should, because it's the same thing as porn. It's disgusting.