Edward
2024 Supporter
- Sep 18, 2012
- 16,152
- 6,574
Jesus was not a transgressor.
He never sinned.
How could he become a transgressor?
He had to commit a sin.
Peter cut off an ear.
There's your sin.
They didn't care it wasn't Jesus, they blamed him for it.
Jesus had it done to fulfill prophecy.
Then he says, "no more", heals the ear and goes to his death as a transgressor.
If the point was for the disciples to carry swords and protect themselves, we surely would have an indication of that elsewhere in Scripture.
I get it now. Jesus was numbered with the transgressors because He was to pay the price for them, He's on our side, (the sinners) so was numbered or reckoned with us. This doesn't mean that He sinned. He did not. Think of a baseball or football team. They take on a new player to play with them, they also have a crappy player which they intend to let go. The new good player isn't considered crappy just because he's on the same team that has a crappy player. lol. Well, maybe by some, but that wouldn't make it the truth now would it?
If the point was more for the disciples to not carry swords...then why does Jesus tell them to sell their cloak and buy one, oh, you have two? It is enough. It seems to me that the more important that something is, the more it will be spoken of in scripture. I believe that this issue, being only spoken of once...isn't really that important. We could get along without a sword, having the God Almighty on our side, but, yeah have a sword, so He mentions it. But not so much as to give people the wrong idea. He IS trying to teach us to love and not so much to war, right? That's why it's not in scripture more, but is in there.
Last edited: