The law was never temporary, or Psalm 119 was the greatest lie ever told in the bible. But were we talking about the Abrahamic covenants?
The law was added because of transgressions. Because "where there is no law, there is no transgression" Romans 4:15.
"Why then the Law? It was added because of transgressions, UNTIL the offspring should come to whom the PROMISE had been made" To whom was the promise made? Galatians 3:16 "Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, “And to seeds,†as referring to many, but rather to one, “And to your seed,†that is, Christ." So say you were watching a group of kids one day and they were completely respectful, compliant, obedient, loving, etc, would you need any rules to keep them from doing wrong? The second day they were atrocious and were screaming, fighting, etc. Would you need rules then for them to walk in obedience and love? The same is true of God, he has provided us ordinances and laws to keep us from doing wrong to one another and to God due to our evil inclination.
And here is where many get confused about what law was added. Let's look at a few passages concerning this...
Gen 26:5 Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.
Scripture says here that Abraham kept the Commandments, the statutes and the laws. Let's look further back (closer to creation). First of all, what is sin?
Rom 4:15 Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.
1Jn 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
Sin is the breaking (transgression) of God's law. So, let's go back to very close to creation...
Gen 4:7 If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well,
sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.
There is no sin where there is no law...
Rom 5:13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
So clearly, there had to be law. The Ten Commandments have been in force at least since creation. It can be determined that they were inforce prior to that...
Eze 28:15 Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created,
till iniquity was found in thee.
Iniquity from Bullingers...
App-44
Companion Bible
Appendix #44
44. SIN, TRESPASS, INIQUITY, &c.
6.'aval , unjust , unfairness, sin in its nature as deceitful , dishonesty, that which is not equal and right, unfairness in dealings. Rendered unjust (Psa_43:1; Psa_82:2. Pro_29:27. Isa_26:10), unrighteous (Lev_19:15; Lev_19:35).
Satan sinned before man was created. He was created perfect and became the Devil after he sinned. So there was law prior to the creation in Gen 2. So what was added 430 years later?
Deu 5:22 These words the LORD spake unto all your assembly in the mount out of the midst of the fire, of the cloud, and of the thick darkness, with a great voice:
and he added no more. And he wrote them in two tables of stone, and delivered them unto me.
God gave the Ten Commandments to Israel, He simply codified them and restated them, but they were in existence prior to that. The important point in this passage is that "He added no more". When were sacrifices added? About nine months after the law was given. The first Passover occured on the 14th of the 1st month...
Exo 12:2 This month shall be unto you the beginning of months: it shall be the first month of the year to you.
Exo 12:6 And ye shall keep it up until the fourteenth day of the same month: and the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill it in the evening.
The Sabbath was reinstituted in Israel in the 2nd month...
Exo 16:1 And they took their journey from Elim, and all the congregation of the children of Israel came unto the wilderness of Sin, which is between Elim and Sinai, on the fifteenth day of the second month after their departing out of the land of Egypt.
And at that time, God's law was in force...
Exo 16:28 And the LORD said unto Moses, How long refuse ye to keep my commandments and my laws?
Mt. Sinai occurred on Pentecost of that year, but the sacrifices could not be offered until a Tabernacle was raised up and a Priesthood consecrated. When did this happen?
Exo 40:1 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
Exo 40:2 On the first day of the first month shalt thou set up the tabernacle of the tent of the congregation.
Exo 40:3 And thou shalt put therein the ark of the testimony, and cover the ark with the vail.
The first day of the first month, but it had to be the second year. So finally, with a Priesthood and Tabernacle, sacrifices could be offered. They were not part of the original Covenant...
Exo 24:3 And Moses came and told the people all the words of the LORD, and all the judgments: and all the people answered with one voice, and said,
All the words which the LORD hath said will we do.
This was the Old Covenant. The Laws were the terms, but the Covenant itself, was the agreement that God would be their God and bless them and they would obey Him. What was added was the law of sacrifices...
Jer 7:22 For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices:
Jer 7:23 But this thing commanded I them, saying, Obey my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people: and walk ye in all the ways that I have commanded you, that it may be well unto you.
Jer 7:24 But they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear, but walked in the counsels and in the imagination of their evil heart, and went backward, and not forward.
The sacrificial law was then a bloody reminder that when they broke the Law, they had sinned and that sin requires blood...
Heb 10:1 For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Heb 10:2 For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins.
Heb 10:3 But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year.
Heb 10:4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
This was the schoolmaster to bring them and us to Christ...
Gal 3:19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
Gal 3:20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
Gal 3:21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Gal 3:22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
Gal 3:23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
Gal 3:24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
Gal 3:25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
Gal 3:26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
The earth is full of unruly children who need instructions in righteousness, but also need redemption from sin. If no law was given, then God's righteous standard would have been unknow and none of us would have realized that we needed to repent and be forgiven for anything.
Paul knew this was a hard to understand passage, so in Galatians 3:21 he upholds the Law to ensure there is nothing clearer that about the role of the law in verse 21, "Is the Law then contrary to the promises of God? May it never be! For if a law had been given which was able to impart life, then righteousness would indeed have been based on law." The "a law" Paul was talking about was the conversion to being legally Jewish, or some other salvation by works to complete the salvation process as that was the messages the troublemakers were spreading. In passages such as this in Romans 3:31 "Do we then nullify the Law through faith? May it never be! On the contrary, we establish the Law." Language like that is crystal clear, Paul's message and passion for the Law is it was never done away with.
Galatians 3:24-25 "But before faith came, we were kept in custody under the law, being shut up to the faith which was later to be revealed. 24 Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith.
"Tutor" here is used in the sense that it was a boy's escort, bodyguard, or someone responsible for that child's safety to and from school. Concordance #G3807
"Kept in custody" was used as "protected," "kept safe," or "guarded." Concordance #G5432
"Shut up" has a positive connotation to it as being "enclosed" and "kept in." Concordance #G4788
So knowing the Greek, it was intended to keep a child inside for their lessons and wouldn't allow them to follow their friends to get themselves into trouble. It kept them inside for the purpose of receiving an education. Galations 3:23-34 would be more accurately translated like this, "But before faith came, we were KEPT PROTECTED under the Law, being KEPT INSIDE FOR the faith which was later to be revealed. Therefore the Law has become our CARETAKER to lead us to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith."
Paul was trying to point out that the Torah was the warden to watch over and protect Israel. It established moral boundaries while awaiting for the Messiah that was still not fully revealed in the Torah to them. In Galatia, some people still believed that converting to being Jewish and keeping the Law was the way to earn salvation. Paul continues in verse 25 " But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor [caretaker]. The caretaker never did the teaching as they were the escort or bodyguard. The Law brought them to Christ as Jesus taught in John 5:46-47 "For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me, for he wrote about Me. 47 But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe My words?†When Paul says "we are no longer under a tutor," he does not mean or imply the Law is null and void. He is saying we should not use the Law or conversion to Judaism to merit our salvation. Knowing that salvation is and always was through the grace of God in Jesus Christ for all.
The two were never opposed each other. How could God be opposed to his own Word?
I've already spoken to this as in Hebrews 7 and 8 is talking about the change in Priesthood from Levitical to Melchizedek. The word "covenant" is in Italics indicating it was an addition by the translators to help provide commentary to understand a passage. In this case, look it up and you'll see it's not there in any Interlinear Bible. If you continue reading in Hebrews 9, it is clear it was still talking about the priestly system.
Hebrews 9:1 "Now even the first covenant [<insertion]had regulations of divine worship and the earthly sanctuary."
Hebrews 9:2 " For there was a tabernacle prepared, the outer one, in which were the lampstand and the table and the sacred bread; this is called the holy place."
And on and on it goes it is clearly about the Priesthood.
Maybe I am dense, but I am still not following you. I believe there are physical and spiritual heirs to the promises, but the most important is everyone was always welcome to live by faith as Abraham did.