Drew
Member
I have no idea what you are saying.So basically someone is calling all those who dont agree with there belief a threat in society. Even everyone callled a threat there own doctor or health professional might not have personally diagnosed them with any contagious disease and they just healthy human beings who want to get on with there daily lives in peace.
Whos the threat.
I think it should be obvious that, in the spirit of "free speech", I should be free to express the view that those who recommend steering clear of the vaccine are jeopardizing the welfare of society.
Why should I not be free to express such a view?
Suppose people here were suggesting that we do away with all traffic regulations - should I not be allowed to state the obvious concern that this would lead to needless carnage on the highways and that those who want to do away with traffic regulations are a "threat" to us all?
Let's remember: you have a right to addressed politely; you do not have right to expect your position will be immune to counterargument. If I can make the case that your position endangers society, why shouldn't I be permitted so to do?