• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

[_ Old Earth _] Creation of man proven

  • Thread starter Thread starter Christ_is_great
  • Start date Start date
C

Christ_is_great

Guest
It's been proven by scientists that the same elements found in the human body are also found in dirt. Either scientists are making fools of themselves, or a Christian scientist found this one out.
 
sigh..

those same elements are also found in air, in water, in dog poop, on the moon, in a toothbrush..

It was gneerally accepted since EVERYTHING is made of of many of the same elements, that they arent that related..

because if what you are saying is true, then teh change of man being made from poop, the ocean, or the moon, are equal.
 
peace4all said:
sigh..

those same elements are also found in air, in water, in dog poop, on the moon, in a toothbrush..

It was gneerally accepted since EVERYTHING is made of of many of the same elements, that they arent that related..

because if what you are saying is true, then teh change of man being made from poop, the ocean, or the moon, are equal.

if we were made from poop, we would have short lived lives like dogs, you know 7 to 10 yrs. amonia is poison for the human body system.
 
Christ_is_great said:
man was created from the ground.


1. Source your information.
2. No scientist that I've heard ever says that humans were made from dust.
 
Christ_is_great said:
It's been proven by scientists that the same elements found in the human body are also found in dirt. Either scientists are making fools of themselves, or a Christian scientist found this one out.

Are you trying to say that the same elements that make up man are found in the environement? If so why is that so shocking? That is what is to be expected as evolutionists have said all along. Now if you had said that the elements that compose mans body are NOT found anywhere else on earth then I might give your argument some consideration.
 
Asimov said:
Christ_is_great said:
man was created from the ground.


1. Source your information.
2. No scientist that I've heard ever says that humans were made from dust.

1. The Bible
2. Christian Scientists
 
reznwerks said:
Christ_is_great said:
It's been proven by scientists that the same elements found in the human body are also found in dirt. Either scientists are making fools of themselves, or a Christian scientist found this one out.

Are you trying to say that the same elements that make up man are found in the environement? If so why is that so shocking? That is what is to be expected as evolutionists have said all along. Now if you had said that the elements that compose mans body are NOT found anywhere else on earth then I might give your argument some consideration.

i've never heard any evolutionist say that we evolved from plants or trees. and if we evolved from apes, why are there still apes on the earth?
 
Christ_is_great said:
i've never heard any evolutionist say that we evolved from plants or trees. and if we evolved from apes, why are there still apes on the earth?

The fact that one species might have evolved from another does not necessarily entail the obliteration of the "parent" species? Why should this be so?

Although the analogy may be a little forced, the fact that the Mazda 3 has effectively evolved from the Mazda Protege does not mean that we should not expect to see both kinds of these cars on the road.
 
your example of cars are non-living things. if we evolved, why have'nt other animals evolved. they've had "billions of years" to do it, why can't they?
 
Finding these elements made inside a star is evidence that no God was needed to create the stuff we are made from.

Quath
 
If God really wanted to be amazing, he would have made us out of things that DON'T exist on earth.

Now that would be proof.

This is similar to what I've often heard about the "miraculous" idea that the human body is 75% hydrogen, and so is the universe. However, those people always seem to fail to mention that the universe is 23% helium, yet we have essentially zero helium in our bodies (unless you like that balloon trick).
 
Christ_is_great said:
your example of cars are non-living things. if we evolved, why have'nt other animals evolved. they've had "billions of years" to do it, why can't they?

Wow. You really don't know anything about the theory of evolution, do you?

The TOE was first devised by Darwin to explain the diversity of animal life on the Galapogos Islands. The finches, for example.

The TOE is a mechanism to explain the diversity of ALL life, include fungi, plants and all animals. Part of the reason why it is accepted by science is because it well explains the diversity of all these lifeforms.

In fact, some of the best evidence we have for evolution stems from our analysis of other animals, such as horses. We have a tremendously detailed fossil ancestry of horses.

Also, almost all "young-earth" creationists, which I assume you are, do believe in at least some evolution, such as all the breeds of dogs and the diversity of skin color among human beings.
 
Darwin was crazy. he said you could still do poop even if you have'nt eaten. :o
 
ThinkerMan said:
Christ_is_great said:
your example of cars are non-living things. if we evolved, why have'nt other animals evolved. they've had "billions of years" to do it, why can't they?

Wow. You really don't know anything about the theory of evolution, do you?

The TOE was first devised by Darwin to explain the diversity of animal life on the Galapogos Islands. The finches, for example.

The TOE is a mechanism to explain the diversity of ALL life, include fungi, plants and all animals. Part of the reason why it is accepted by science is because it well explains the diversity of all these lifeforms.

In fact, some of the best evidence we have for evolution stems from our analysis of other animals, such as horses. We have a tremendously detailed fossil ancestry of horses.

Also, almost all "young-earth" creationists, which I assume you are, do believe in at least some evolution, such as all the breeds of dogs and the diversity of skin color among human beings.

have'nt you seen dirt? it's all kinds of colors. it's beige, red, yellow, brown and all other kinds of colors. that explains different shades of skin color
 
Christ_is_great said:
Asimov said:
[quote="Christ_is_great":2a506]man was created from the ground.


1. Source your information.
2. No scientist that I've heard ever says that humans were made from dust.

1. The Bible
2. Christian Scientists[/quote:2a506]

:roll:

You said scientists have found out that we came from dust. Source the information that you got where science has said that, in a peer-reviewed journal.
 
Christ_is_great said:
Darwin was crazy. he said you could still do poop even if you have'nt eaten. :o
Where did you hear this and what is the context? I think if you honestly looked at this, you would not find any sense of craziness.

Quath
 
Christ_is_great said:
ThinkerMan said:
[quote="Christ_is_great":68d6b]your example of cars are non-living things. if we evolved, why have'nt other animals evolved. they've had "billions of years" to do it, why can't they?

Wow. You really don't know anything about the theory of evolution, do you?

The TOE was first devised by Darwin to explain the diversity of animal life on the Galapogos Islands. The finches, for example.

The TOE is a mechanism to explain the diversity of ALL life, include fungi, plants and all animals. Part of the reason why it is accepted by science is because it well explains the diversity of all these lifeforms.

In fact, some of the best evidence we have for evolution stems from our analysis of other animals, such as horses. We have a tremendously detailed fossil ancestry of horses.

Also, almost all "young-earth" creationists, which I assume you are, do believe in at least some evolution, such as all the breeds of dogs and the diversity of skin color among human beings.

have'nt you seen dirt? it's all kinds of colors. it's beige, red, yellow, brown and all other kinds of colors. that explains different shades of skin color[/quote:68d6b]

You owe me a tie! I lauged so hard I spit Coke all over my new Calvin Klein tie.

I guess if I need a tan I'll forget that tanning booth and just eat some food grown in darker dirt. Not that pastey white soil my food has thus far been grown in.

Thanks!
 
ThinkerMan said:
Christ_is_great said:
ThinkerMan said:
[quote="Christ_is_great":4ec97]your example of cars are non-living things. if we evolved, why have'nt other animals evolved. they've had "billions of years" to do it, why can't they?

Wow. You really don't know anything about the theory of evolution, do you?

The TOE was first devised by Darwin to explain the diversity of animal life on the Galapogos Islands. The finches, for example.

The TOE is a mechanism to explain the diversity of ALL life, include fungi, plants and all animals. Part of the reason why it is accepted by science is because it well explains the diversity of all these lifeforms.

In fact, some of the best evidence we have for evolution stems from our analysis of other animals, such as horses. We have a tremendously detailed fossil ancestry of horses.

Also, almost all "young-earth" creationists, which I assume you are, do believe in at least some evolution, such as all the breeds of dogs and the diversity of skin color among human beings.

have'nt you seen dirt? it's all kinds of colors. it's beige, red, yellow, brown and all other kinds of colors. that explains different shades of skin color

You owe me a tie! I lauged so hard I spit Coke all over my new Calvin Klein tie.

I guess if I need a tan I'll forget that tanning booth and just eat some food grown in darker dirt. Not that pastey white soil my food has thus far been grown in.

Thanks![/quote:4ec97]
I never said that eating different food makes you darker or lighter. I said, were were made from the ground, which has different colors. you went too over the top with the tie though. :lol:
 
Back
Top