Gendou Ikari said:
Well, it certainly can't be helping the sinner, so it must be to satisfy God's own bloody lust or something else.
Assumption: hell must be helpful to the sinner
Gendou said:
Either way God's is not doing what is best for the sinner. (But shouldn't a father do what is best for their children.) Apparently God created Human fathers much better than He is a Father.
Assumption: God must do what is best for the sinner; that there must be some purpose for the sinner in hell.
Assumption: God is the Father of all people (see Romans 8:15)
Would it be better if God sent all unbelievers to the corner, gave them all a "timeout" or sent them to bed without dinner?
Gendou said:
Well, eternal damnation says that God will torture people for all eternity. I'm not making this stuff up bloke. Unless you mean anihilation.
I don't mean annihilation, but I also don't think that the statement that "God will torture people for eternity" can be supported by Scripture.
Gendou said:
If He couldn't have done it another way than He is not omnipotent.
Assumption: Omnipotence means God can do absolutely anything.
Look around you, don't you see the helpless and the weak. Is God so selfish and indifferent that He doesn't care anymore?
The whole problem is that people are not necessarily helpless and weak (I suppose we could define that, but I don't think it does anything to either of our arguments). People are strongheaded and rebellious. As has been pointed out by McQuacks -- it is
they who reject God out of the hardness of their hearts.
Gendou said:
Ever heard of compassion. Let's assume that someone killed your sister/brother. (Flash to years later) He is truly sorry for what he has done but you say "Sorry you could have not done it." (You shoot him in the head.)
Ever heard of the cross?
Gendou said:
Humans are flawed beings(No we were not created perfect) surely God with infinite wisdom and power could feel compasion on poor hopeless spirits.
That is why he came in human flesh to die on the cross.
Gendou said:
God created us and we are His responsablility. I'll borrow a quote.
"Now listen carefully. Here is wisdom beyond its years. When a scientist creates an experiment or machine that malfunctions, is he responsible for the malfunction? Yes. Does he hold the experiment or machine responsible? No. Does he hold God responsible? No. Okay.
Now then, according to Christendom, when God creates an experiment or machine that malfunctions, is He responsible for the malfunction? No. Does He hold the experiment or machine responsible? Yes. Does He hold man responsible? Yes. See the wisdom?"â€â€L. Ray Smith
Of course you do realize that the quote essentially puts all the blame on God for all the sins we commit. It is a deterministic position, which I reject precisely because then, yes, it wouldn't be fair since it would be God making us sin. I would also question whether or not there actually was any malfunction.
Gendou said:
It certainly does not make Him a loving Father. What good and kind Father will not go out and save His son. Again Human fathers are better than God as a Father.
But, as I and kwag have pointed out, sonship doesn't extend to everybody. This also ignores that God sent the ultimate sacrifice to provide the way to reconciliation so that we won't go to hell.