Daniel’s 42nd week

[Sinthesis]

Re: Daniels 2nd week – A major revival

Yes, but the 360 day calendar also had leap-days inserted into it. This was necessary to keep it in step with our solar cycle of 365.24 days.

They even had leap-months.

 

[Sinthesis]

Roundabouts week 41-42:

Dan 11:21 - And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.
Dan 11:22 - And with the arms of a flood shall they be overflown from before him, and shall be broken; yea, also the prince of the covenant.
Dan 11:23 - And after the league [made] with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.
Dan 11:24 - He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do [that] which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers' fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: [yea], and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time.
Dan 11:25 - And he shall stir up his power and his courage against the king of the south with a great army; and the king of the south shall be stirred up to battle with a very great and mighty army; but he shall not stand: for they shall forecast devices against him.
Dan 11:26 - Yea, they that feed of the portion of his meat shall destroy him, and his army shall overflow: and many shall fall down slain.
Dan 11:27 - And both these kings' hearts [shall be] to do mischief, and they shall speak lies at one table; but it shall not prosper: for yet the end [shall be] at the time appointed.
Dan 11:28 - Then shall he return into his land with great riches; and his heart [shall be] against the holy covenant; and he shall do [exploits], and return to his own land.
Dan 11:29 ¶ At the time appointed he shall return, and come toward the south; but it shall not be as the former, or as the latter.
Dan 11:30 - For the ships of Chittim shall come against him: therefore he shall be grieved, and return, and have indignation against the holy covenant: so shall he do; he shall even return, and have intelligence with them that forsake the holy covenant.
Dan 11:31 - And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily [sacrifice], and they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate.
Dan 11:32 - And such as do wickedly against the covenant shall he corrupt by flatteries: but the people that do know their God shall be strong, and do [exploits].
Dan 11:33 - And they that understand among the people shall instruct many: yet they shall fall by the sword, and by flame, by captivity, and by spoil, [many] days.
Dan 11:34 - Now when they shall fall, they shall be holpen with a little help: but many shall cleave to them with flatteries.
Dan 11:35 - And [some] of them of understanding shall fall, to try them, and to purge, and to make [them] white, [even] to the time of the end: because [it is] yet for a time appointed.​

 

[precepts]

Re: Daniels 2nd week – A major revival

Whether we use the Hebrew, the Chinese, or ours, they are all governed by two unchanging things:

1. The earth takes 365.24 days to get around the sun.
2. The moon takes 354.14 days to get around the earth.

Therefore, any calendar can be made to coincide with another if we have the leap-year formula.

Which is a bold face lie. If it took the earth 365.24 days to circle the sun, there wouldn't be a need to adust the calendar to keep the equinoxes in sync. Anyone with basic understanding of our "Egyptian/Roman" solar calendar knows that we are slowly drifting away, and will need to omit or add days to keep in sync! There is no calendar known to man that can accurately divide the year into an exact fraction. Pope Gregory XIII's calendar, which is the one we use today, is the closest yet, but in time will need to be adjusted to keep the equinoxes and solstices aligned. Pope Gregory established that only centenary yrs divisible by 400 to be leap yrs to correct the error in "Pontificus Maximus" (Pope) Julius Ceasar's calendar, alotting 11 excessive minutes to the yr, resulting in the omitting of 11 days from the calendar in 1752. There is no calendar known to man that can accurately divide the yr evenly, thus the leap yrs for "alignment."

Originally Posted by precepts
In order for your chart to be correct, you would have to have the date from Eden to calculate the sabbatical years

No, we only need one correct date and (if it is sure) we can then count forwards as well as backwards from that point. As it happens there are a dozen or so points where Sabbatic years are known and they all confirm eachother.

How can you count not knowing the amount of days in a hebrew yr? The 360 days a yr calendar laps/swallows up the 365 days 6 hours a yr calendar every 69yrs by 367 days. Plus, you're totally ignoring the fact, 1,260 days equals 3 1/2 yrs only with 12 thirty day months.

Originally Posted by precepts
The key to understanding prophecy is calculating the date from Eden using the orginal Genesis calendar. The 1,260 days only equals 3 1/2 yrs if the 12months carry 30 days each, 360 + 360 + 360 + 180 = 1,260 days.; times, time, and the dividing of time (360 being time).

Yes, but the 360 day calendar also had leap-days inserted into it. This was necessary to keep it in step with our solar cycle of 365.24 days.

If it did, 1,260 could not equal 3 1/2 yrs, and from since when do we have knowledge of a 360 day calendar?! Before 2009 there was no knowledge of a 360 days calendar. Where and when did this knowledge come about?


Thru biblical information, I have calculated the date from Eden, the date of the Exodus, etc., and they all coincide with history's BC/AD accounts. I even have the name of the Egyptian pharoahs during the time of the Exodus, the exact date of the temple's destruction and rebuilding, and the time span of the 1,335, the 1,260/1,290, and the 2,300 day prophecies. These are facts. The 490 yrs/days prophecy is the time/yrs of the Persia/Mede/Greek occupation of Israel. The 70 yrs exile wasn't all spent in Babylon, the 70 yrs span from the destruction of the temple to the rebuilding. It was exactly 70 hebrew yrs from the destruction of the temple to the rebuilding, thus the 490 yr prophecy of 7 X 70 yrs equaling the Persian/Greek time period in Daniel's prophecy.

 

[Cyberseeker]

Re: Daniels 2nd week – A major revival

There is no calendar known to man that can accurately divide the yr evenly, thus the leap yrs for "alignment."

There is indeed a calendar that can accurately divide the year evenly, thus the leap yrs for "alignment. Please consider getting this book.

 

[Stormcrow]

The third poster on this thread was right...

Here's what the third poster wrote:

We can clearly see through scripture that when God said day, week, year or series of days, weeks or years he ment just that a day meaning a day a week meaning a week a year meaning a year! Why would it suddenly be any different in the book of Daniel speeking of the 70 weeks??

The actual Hebrew words are "shboim shboim" and literally translated "sevens seventy." This phrase is most often translated "seventy weeks", but at least one translation translates it this way:

{24} “Seventy sets of seven time periods..." Daniel 9:24 (GW)

While more verbose, this translation is more accurate, at least as far as this verse goes.

 

[precepts]

Re: Daniels 2nd week – A major revival

There is indeed a calendar that can accurately divide the year evenly, thus the leap yrs for "alignment. Please consider getting this book.

One man's opinion doesn't change the facts. The time of the rotation of the earth around the sun is not a whole number, that's common sense.

 

[precepts]

Re: Daniels 2nd week – A major revival

There is indeed a calendar that can accurately divide the year evenly, thus the leap yrs for "alignment. Please consider getting this book.

One man's opinion could never change the facts. The year is not divided into a whole number, that means that over a period of time it will add up. Besides that, why would the pope adopt a solar egyptian calendar and not the original hebrew calendar, especially if the so called hebrew calendar was accurate?