persecuted
Member
Well Jessanew, can't say you've convinced me of anything. lol.... "appropriate steps taken".... and what exactly are these appropriate steps the skanky women I come across have taken??? Not sure which ones even claim to be Christian.
I agree, however, with your assessment that someone else's past is "my problem". But here is a great deal.... I like to tell the story of the girl when I was 17. I was so isolated at the time that I allowed her to lock me in.... and it wasn't hypothetical of what her past was. At present, there is no specific woman with a specific past. Further, I get around better and am not as shy as then so that if I so choose, I can meet many different women. So if I don't like something, ANYTHING, I can just move on. Or am I supposed to sleep with any and ALL women out of CHRISTIAN duty to prove that I am not "judging" them??? If not, all why should I be obligated to forgiving the past of one specific woman? I'm sure she can find someone else and if I think I can do better, so be it. Why throw in moral obligations in pointless situations?
Jessanew, I do find it ironic your uppity about male behaviours because I really believe that my much more ruthless view of dating developed from mirroring female behaviour. Once I came across women with their "right" to do the financial probe in the first three minutes of meeting them and the "he just seemed "creepy.. but no, he didn't actually say or do anything" crowd, it likewise inspired me. So if a chick doesn't have a super hot body and some serious moral background, I guess its most likely ba-bye... which I don't think is any worse than female criterias.
... and on the issue of "thou shalt not judge" I think I should start a new thread for it. Just will say, I maintain that bible quote is used awfully selectively nowadays and it is interesting that the religious left can say for God what transgressions are "minor".
I agree, however, with your assessment that someone else's past is "my problem". But here is a great deal.... I like to tell the story of the girl when I was 17. I was so isolated at the time that I allowed her to lock me in.... and it wasn't hypothetical of what her past was. At present, there is no specific woman with a specific past. Further, I get around better and am not as shy as then so that if I so choose, I can meet many different women. So if I don't like something, ANYTHING, I can just move on. Or am I supposed to sleep with any and ALL women out of CHRISTIAN duty to prove that I am not "judging" them??? If not, all why should I be obligated to forgiving the past of one specific woman? I'm sure she can find someone else and if I think I can do better, so be it. Why throw in moral obligations in pointless situations?
Jessanew, I do find it ironic your uppity about male behaviours because I really believe that my much more ruthless view of dating developed from mirroring female behaviour. Once I came across women with their "right" to do the financial probe in the first three minutes of meeting them and the "he just seemed "creepy.. but no, he didn't actually say or do anything" crowd, it likewise inspired me. So if a chick doesn't have a super hot body and some serious moral background, I guess its most likely ba-bye... which I don't think is any worse than female criterias.
... and on the issue of "thou shalt not judge" I think I should start a new thread for it. Just will say, I maintain that bible quote is used awfully selectively nowadays and it is interesting that the religious left can say for God what transgressions are "minor".