Sandy Zalecki
Member
"Knowledge puffs up, but love edifies. And if any think that he know anything, he know nothing yet as he ought to know. But if anyone loves God, that one is known by him." 1 Cor. 8:1-2
I usually don't like to talk about politics, but this one is very near and dear to my heart so I am going to voice my opinion about the Supreme Court ruling on the Hobby Lobby issue. My daughter-in-law works for Hobby Lobby and that is why I am concerned about it.
I feel the ruling was fair. I don't think that a corporation or anyone should be forced to pay for something they oppose for religions and moral grounds. The owners of Hobby Lobby are Christians and they do not not want to pay for the morning after pill because they consider it abortion which they do not agree with.
Is this ruling an infringement on religious freedom or a correct ruling because the government has overstepped its bounds by forcing someone to do something they disagree with on moral and religious grounds? I believe it is the latter. Why should the owners of Hobby Lobby even have to go to court? Why was the government forcing them to pay for the morning after pill in the first place?
Now, Hobby Lobby is being accused of forcing their religion on others. How is that? They have never passed out a track to me when I entered the store. My daughter-in-law who is a Christian has never been forced to accept Christianity as her religion just because she works there. If a woman does not like the fact that Hobby Lobby won't pay for the morning after pill she is free to get another job.
This whole thing smells of yet another attempt to marginalize Christians and take our Christian heritage away from us. I for one think we should be more forceful in spreading our religion. We have lost so much. The only way we are going to get it back is to speak up and be prepared to take the persecution that follows. My hat is off to Hobby Lobby for standing up for what they believe.
I usually don't like to talk about politics, but this one is very near and dear to my heart so I am going to voice my opinion about the Supreme Court ruling on the Hobby Lobby issue. My daughter-in-law works for Hobby Lobby and that is why I am concerned about it.
I feel the ruling was fair. I don't think that a corporation or anyone should be forced to pay for something they oppose for religions and moral grounds. The owners of Hobby Lobby are Christians and they do not not want to pay for the morning after pill because they consider it abortion which they do not agree with.
Is this ruling an infringement on religious freedom or a correct ruling because the government has overstepped its bounds by forcing someone to do something they disagree with on moral and religious grounds? I believe it is the latter. Why should the owners of Hobby Lobby even have to go to court? Why was the government forcing them to pay for the morning after pill in the first place?
Now, Hobby Lobby is being accused of forcing their religion on others. How is that? They have never passed out a track to me when I entered the store. My daughter-in-law who is a Christian has never been forced to accept Christianity as her religion just because she works there. If a woman does not like the fact that Hobby Lobby won't pay for the morning after pill she is free to get another job.
This whole thing smells of yet another attempt to marginalize Christians and take our Christian heritage away from us. I for one think we should be more forceful in spreading our religion. We have lost so much. The only way we are going to get it back is to speak up and be prepared to take the persecution that follows. My hat is off to Hobby Lobby for standing up for what they believe.