K
kingdavid
Guest
“ The revival is over. America had her last chance in 1957. Now the tongues, are God's sign of impending disaster, even as they were when they appeared upon the wall at Belshazzar's feast….(W. Branham, THE MESSAGE TO THE LAODICEAN AGE p.29) According to revivalists today who endorse Branhams ministry we are currently experiencing a revival of unprecedented proportions. So ids Branham a false prophet according to them or are they false according to Branham.[/quote]
On a side note, regarding the last bolded part. Recently there was one of these supposed revivals with the full endorsement of all who follow Branham and the Kansas City Prophets. It was lead by Todd Bentley. My former pastor endorsed this revival whole heartedly which lead my wife and I to leave that church, since there were some glaringly obvious errors in teaching. In the end, it came out that Todd Bentley had been having an affair during this "revival". What an absolute mockery.[/quote]
_________________________________________________________________________________
talking about bearing false witness against a man, this is definitely one of those. no one that follows bro. branham's teachings endorsed todd bentley.
todd's angel was the angel of the bottomless pit which is the king of the spirit of rock and roll(locusts-revelations 9). no comparison between the 2, unless you are carnal minded and can't tell/see the difference.
bro. branham said there would be many false christs arise or false annointed ones and of course they would hold revivals of their own. bro. branham said the revival for america is over. the true believer will always have their own personal revival with the Lord in their heart.
there will be plenty of revivivals so-called by the false religious world or we could call them the tares or false christs.
many people supported christ when all the signs were manifested but didn't believe his words. what does so-called revivalists that supported bro. branham's meetings but refute what he said have to do with bro. branham being wrong? they are just going to stand at the white throne judgement and give account for their willful disobedience to what the man of God said and be guilty of being carnal impersonators.
On a side note, regarding the last bolded part. Recently there was one of these supposed revivals with the full endorsement of all who follow Branham and the Kansas City Prophets. It was lead by Todd Bentley. My former pastor endorsed this revival whole heartedly which lead my wife and I to leave that church, since there were some glaringly obvious errors in teaching. In the end, it came out that Todd Bentley had been having an affair during this "revival". What an absolute mockery.[/quote]
_________________________________________________________________________________
talking about bearing false witness against a man, this is definitely one of those. no one that follows bro. branham's teachings endorsed todd bentley.
todd's angel was the angel of the bottomless pit which is the king of the spirit of rock and roll(locusts-revelations 9). no comparison between the 2, unless you are carnal minded and can't tell/see the difference.
bro. branham said there would be many false christs arise or false annointed ones and of course they would hold revivals of their own. bro. branham said the revival for america is over. the true believer will always have their own personal revival with the Lord in their heart.
there will be plenty of revivivals so-called by the false religious world or we could call them the tares or false christs.
many people supported christ when all the signs were manifested but didn't believe his words. what does so-called revivalists that supported bro. branham's meetings but refute what he said have to do with bro. branham being wrong? they are just going to stand at the white throne judgement and give account for their willful disobedience to what the man of God said and be guilty of being carnal impersonators.