H
Hitch
Guest
No . John defines antiChirst and never associates it with any of these things. I urege any believer to adopt and submit to the clear portions of revelation, in this case John's definition of his own term.Thanks Hitch,
Agreed, Antichrist is anyone “that denieth the Father and the Son (1 John 2:22).” I would add Vladimir Lenin to your list and rank Lenin preeminent among such historical figures.
The question is whether John’s advice, “as ye have heard that antichrist shall come (1 John 2:18),” anticipates an archetype. Those among us who expect an archetype treat John’s comment as an implication. Those who do not expect an archetype dismiss the expectation as inference. We’ll have to wait and see. In the meantime, here’s a reference:
Blue Letter Bible - Lexicon
Otherwise, there may be a quandary regarding Lucifer’s supposed cohabitation of a human form (the archetypal Antichrist). As John observes:
And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.
Revelation 16:13
John appears to distinguish three distinct malefactors: the ‘dragon’ (Lucifer), the ‘beast’ (Antichrist), and the ‘false prophet’ (whomever). If John portrays the scoundrels separately, while Lucifer supposedly indwells Antichrist, would not Lucifer have to be in two places at once?
Ignoring definitions when they are given leads to buliding an entire one world horrible everything on the strength of an interpretation of this line;
The question is whether John’s advice, “as ye have heard that antichrist shall come (1 John 2:18),” anticipates an archetype.
Its incredibly weak especially considering the power you all grant so easily to this boog-ey man. And its not the text, but a necessary interpretaion tht even makes any of this pissible.
Johns letter is openly addressed, it is not to any certain church it is to all the churches. In some as John says plainly antiChrist is at work, in some it may be at work but not as noticibly.
John says; antiChirst is working has worked and will work. This aligns with what Jesus said wrt having troubles with the kingdom, far batter than one world blah blah this and that, which are not found or even alluded to in Jonhs letter. He warns of being seduced not rounded up and placed in what ever is the current antiChrist fad callls for. . And the work John ascribes to antiChrist is lying, lying about the nature and being of Christ. Not a word about world domination.
A famiiar objection ususally comes up about being decieved and taking the mark of the beast (sic) , but the real danger is missing current and future assults by antiChrists that are first and formost denying the person, diety and being of Jesus Christ.
Every one wants a mosnter,and obvious enemy, a tangible opponent, not clean cut mormons knocking at the door.
Last edited by a moderator: